xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/005/299/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

15 Feby 1813

Church II Topics
Ch. 6. Qualif

3

§.1. Abstract fitness
Part

You , who being of among the rulers of the established Church of
England call yourselves Christians, in lieu of subscription
to these your articles, will you accept of subscription
to articles composed altogether of the creeds so ascribed
to your Christ? Not you indeed: at any rate
not till after a course of repentance, of which as yet no
symptoms have been discernible. Then what is can more
what is the religion to which you adhere? — The religion
of nobody-knows-who — not the religion of him whom
you call your Christ.

J.B. to Church rulers.
You who call yourselves
Christians
would you accept
subscription articles composed to him
of the words of Jesus?
No indeed — then
what is whose is the religion
you adhere
to — Not Jesus —
but nobody
knows whom —

Talk not of interpretation. — in In the mouth
of priestcraft, as in the mouth of lawyercraft — interpretation
is of old a cloak employed to cover and give
effect to enactment and abrogation. To the words expressive
of your inferences [or pretended inferences] from
the sacred texts were the texts themselves from which they those inferences
were respectively deduced, prefixed or subjoined, for
employing the word interpretation — how useless and pernicious
so ever the operation might be especially when so performed
might be — there might be some pretext +. But to
+ In P.G. Practice lecture
the sacred texts these inferences of yours are neither
prefixed nor subjoined — no, they are substituted

"Interpretation" no
— In the
mouth of priests &
interpretation means
abrogation & enactment
Conceditur, there
might be some
pretext if the
sacred text were
annexed, — but
these inferences
are not annexed
— but substituted J
J
to the text. J

Substituted? — and wherefore? — to what end? —
By the texts your the purposes — your the sinister purposes —
of your predecessors would not have been served: of your by the inferences
drawn or pretended to be drawn from those same texts those sinister purposes were
served: and therefore was the substitution made. By the
text, your own purposes — Your own sinister purposes —
would not now be served: — by those inferences these your sinister
purposes are served but too well: and therefore is the substitution defended and preserved.

By the text the
sinister purposes of your
predecessors would
not be served — By
therefore was the
substitution made
— By the text your
sinister purposes would
not be served, — therefore
is the substitution
defended.




Identifier: | JB/005/299/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 5.

Date_1

1813-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

005

Main Headings

church of englandism

Folio number

299

Info in main headings field

church

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…> co

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

2716

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk