JB/006/070/001

Click Here To Edit

1. In relation to this
as to other offices
(...ing preponderant
inconvenience) causes
and mode of removal ought to correspond.
mode and causes of
removal should be
such as promise the
continuance of the
highest degree of aptitude
in the official
person (as mode of
appointment should
secure it on entrance
into office) regard
being had to existing
rights. p1

2

2. When the possessor
of an office becomes
unfit to such a degree
as to outbalance the
evils of change, he
should be removed,
and a successor appointed.
p.1.

3

3 In case of a non-established
Church, the
assurance that the
course taken gives
the fairest promise
of proceeding in the
best manner for the
accomplishment of
the ends of the office,
has been shewn to be
at its' maximum.
The instructor continuing
to render
his services to his
pupil, not longer
than the pupil supposes
him to possess
the highest degree
of aptitude of any
whose services are
obtainable. p.2.

4

4 Such removal
either by the act of
a majority, or by gradual
recession, is
incompatible with
an established church
as above explained,
with the right of
patronage where
it exists. p.3

5

5 But there are some
cases which suppose
the highest degrees
of inaptitude, ex. gr.
extinction, partial
or total, of the qualifying
endowments,
hence the necessity
of a judicatory
to ascertain the existence
of causes of removal.

p.3

(a)

Uncontrouled power
of removal, in congregation
, for example,
right of appointment
in patrons
hands would not secure
efficient right
of patronage as they
might might prevent
him from securing
the benefit to the
person he had the
best opinion of.

p.3

6

6. Degree of inaptitude
being given,
mischief is the same,
whether the inaptitude
existed at the
time of appointment,
or was brought into
existence afterwards.

p4

. 7 .

Ergo the judicatory
which decides on fitness
of appointment
is the best to decide
on propriety of removal.
The consideration
of a fit judicatory,
is referred to
Chapter qualifications

p.4.

7

7. An objection to
this arrangement
may however be
here brought to view,
viz that in the proposed
judicatory,
the judge's partiality
for his own choices
may lead him to
continue an unfit
incumbent. p.5

9

8. Either of two arrangements
would
o/b obviate this objection.

p.5

10

1. This objection
applies only to the
identity of the judges,
and would be
remedied by an
arrangement, which
would secure different
judges. p.5.

11

-9- 2. Appeal
allowed to another
judicatory, by which
no part has been taken
in relation to
the individual.

p.6

12

10. The only objection
remaining
is the consideration
of delay attendant
on appeal.

p.6.

Identifier: | JB/006/070/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 6.
Date_1	1813-03-06	Marginal Summary Numbering	[[marginal_summary_numbering::1-5, [5]a, 6-12]]
Box	006	Main Headings	church of englandism
Folio number	070	Info in main headings field	church
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	walter coulson	Watermarks	<…> co
Marginals		Paper Producer	a. levy
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	2803
Box Contents