JB/011/104/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 16
Review of J.B. and H.B.

(2

Sub reformists classed Anti-Reformists declared

5
Self preference no
exception to the rule

Self preference — vulgarly regarded as an exception to the
general rule, in fact the rule and the exception are
reversed.

6
Nothing more favourable
than the light thrown
upon Codification by
its opponents

Nothing can happen more favourably
for this design than that it should have the benefit of the
light thrown upon the subject of Codification by
the opponents of it. Sincere altogether is this declaration
howsoever different may be the construction
by different persons put upon it.

To and from this makes mutual references to
Inclination respecting Lord Eldon under the heart of
what is said of the Feegathering Regulating Statute

7.
No sincerity as to
Law Reform in
supporters of Eldon's
fee gathering bill

Impossibility of supposing sincerity as to Law Reform to
have place in the breasts of any Parliament man person who contributed
to that Statute or stood silent when it was proposed.

Chancery Commission Report?
Per William Walton Esqr
The control which the courts have over costs,
will enable them to make many useful alterations
of their own authority — p.634.

Identifier: | JB/011/104/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.
Date_1	1829-06-16	Marginal Summary Numbering	6-7
Box	011	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	104	Info in main headings field	review of j & hb
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2
Penner	george bentham; jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	3801
Box Contents