JB/011/152/001

Click Here To Edit

1829. Aug. 13.
Reformists reviewed

Peel's Acts
Act 3/7.

(4

But suppose for argument sake there was no such power
what would be the result and practical inference? Answer
that by the process then pursued — this same process of which
the distinctive name is consolidation, no practical benefit
nothing of that benefit which it professes to endeavour to
provide can, in the nature of the case be produced: and
that in contradistinction to consolidation, and to the exclusion
of consolidation, the one thing needful and
the only thing reasonable is — its result — codification.

Identifier: | JB/011/152/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.
Date_1	1829-08-13	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	011	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	152	Info in main headings field	reformists reviewed
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	3849
Box Contents