xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/114/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

13 Sept. 1814

Logic or Ethics Ch. Fortitude
§. Fortitude

§.1. Relation to primary Virtues

Integrity Integrality Pseudo-conjugate. 2

Difficult — in many instances but too difficult — to
know — but at any rate here is something to be known,
and that something not ill worth worth knowing.

The benefit whether to a man's self or to some
other man or set of men is the article to be purchased:
in by exposing him to the danger to which he exposes his it is proposed that
he should expose himself he would pay the price
necessary to be paid for the chance of obtaining that
benefit. Whether the benefit commodity article is worth the price
that must be paid this is the question and the only
question worth considering, whether in case of his exposing
himself to the danger the act which he exercises
in so exposing himself be entitled to the appellation
of an act of fortitude, this is a mere question
of words, a question not worth the words that necessarily must
be expended in the proposing of it.

A question of this sort is not merely useless.
By confer throwing men's a man's ideas into confusion, and
thus eventually leading them him to pursue a line of conduct
adverse to that of his interest or that of his duty
adverse to the interest in question, the tendency of
it is positively pernicious.

The line act of conduct most least conducive to that interest
suppose it understood to merit the appellation
of an act of fortitude. What is the practical consequence?
that fortitude being a virtue, the pernicious line of
conduct in question is that which ought to be pursued.

The line of conduct most conducive suppose
it not to merit that appellation of fortitude. What is
the consequence? That not being conformable to the idea of according to virtue, it
belongs to the category of Folly or of vice

☞ T a nature



Identifier: | JB/014/114/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1814-09-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

114

Info in main headings field

logic or ethics

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4877

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk