xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/015/523/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1821. March 3.d
Deontology private.

Negative beneficence
annoyance corporeal

Of the five senses, the feeling and the taste do not, on
this occasion, come in question: annoyance to either of these
senses presents itself in the from of a legally punishable offence:
annoyance to the touch or feeling, presents the idea becomes
of what, in law language, is called assault: annoyance to
the taste presents the idea of poison; and, unless deceit or
threats intimidation be employed as the instrument of it, can not but involve
in it an offence of the nature of assault.

In a word, the only senses exposed to what on this,
occasion, is meant by The annoyances, are the three senses which come under Deontological cognizance which
are capable of being operated upon without any such operation
in consequence of which immediate contact is generally regarded as
having place. These are the smell, the hearing, and the sight.

1. The smell. The ways in which annoyance may be
inflicted on this sense are, for the most part, sufficiently
obvious. Under this head, some cautions there are which
may not be altogether without their use.

Trifling as they may seem at first sight, in regard of to all
these modes of annoyance which operate through the senses,
such may be the effect to banish one friend from the Society
of another, and even render a man an object of recorded
aversions to a whole company in any degree numerous.
Trifing as it may seem, what renders the mischief in this case
the more serious, is that, by a sort of mixture of shame, fear
and sympathy, the person by whom the annoyance is felt is
apt to be restrained from making communication of his feelings
to the person who is the author of it. Here, then, is the case
of an act which, having the effect of maleficence, is forbidden
stands clearly prohibited by the dictates of negative beneficence,
and thereby thence of self regarding prudence. Trifling as it may
seem in the extreme, greater annoyance id produced by it than
would be produced by many punishable offence, at the same
time that, by the circumstance just mentioned, the injury, such
as it is, stands precluded from the benefit of pardon



Identifier: | JB/015/523/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 15.

Date_1

1821-03-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

015

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

523

Info in main headings field

deontology private

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / f208

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

john flowerdew colls

Corrections

sir john bowring

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

5739

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk