JB/107/260/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/107/260/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
a reflection or two under the <sic>stile</sic> and title of <hi rend="underline">practical</hi><lb/>
a reflection or two under the <sic>stile</sic> and title of <hi rend="underline">practical</hi><lb/>
comes<add>came</add> to be made, <add>a diversion is created, and</add>the mind of the hearer is made<lb/>
comes<add>came</add> to be made, <add>a diversion is created, and</add>the mind of the hearer is made<lb/>
is effectually <gap/>ned used. from all such ideas as those<lb/>
is effectually <unclear>termed</unclear> used. from all such ideas as those<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">publicity</hi> and <hi rend="underline">evidence</hi>. "Which reflections show"<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">publicity</hi> and <hi rend="underline">evidence</hi>. "Which reflections show"<lb/>
(says he) - <add>Well? what is it that they</add> What do they shew?  Had the word "<hi rend="underline">known</hi>" <lb/>
(says he) - <add>Well? what is it that they</add> What do they shew?  Had the word "<hi rend="underline">known</hi>" <lb/>
stood alone, what they might have been thought to state<lb/>
stood alone, what they might have been thought to <unclear>show</unclear><lb/>
would have been that the general rule acted under<lb/>
would have been that the general rule acted under<lb/>
the <add>individual </add> falls deemed to have come under that rule and<lb/>
the <add>individual </add> falls deemed to have come under that rule and<lb/>
Line 17: Line 17:
as established <del>there</del> ought to be present to the<lb/>
as established <del>there</del> ought to be present to the<lb/>
minds in which the <hi rend="underline">knowledge</hi> in question is stated<lb/>
minds in which the <hi rend="underline">knowledge</hi> in question is stated<lb/>
as requisite to  be  <unclear>planted</unclear>. <add>[+] </add> But to the purpose of <note><add>[+] This is what they might have been <add>understood</add>thought to shew <gap/>nd the word <hi rend="underline">known</hi> stood when, this is what they might have been thought<add>understood</add> to shew</note><lb/>
as requisite to  be  <unclear>planted</unclear>. <add>[+] </add> But to the purpose of <note><add>[+]</add> This is what they might have been <add>understood</add>thought to shew and the word <hi rend="underline">known</hi> stood alone, this is what they might have been thought<add>understood</add> to shew</note><lb/>
the Reverend Doctor and his system any any such conception<lb/>
the Reverend Doctor and his system any any such conception<lb/>
would have been fatal.  Accordingly, and that, <add>by</add> the<lb/>
would have been fatal.  Accordingly, and that, <add>by</add> the<lb/>
Line 34: Line 34:
Doctor to have been passed by as not worth notice: <add>and this is</add> <foreign>viz</foreign>.<lb/>
Doctor to have been passed by as not worth notice: <add>and this is</add> <foreign>viz</foreign>.<lb/>
that, for corruption in a Judge, it is in some cases possible, (such<lb/>
that, for corruption in a Judge, it is in some cases possible, (such<lb/>
as receipt of hard money for a <unclear>dastardly</unclear> <gap/> purpose)though in no <add>case</add> <note>-case very easy, for the JUdge to be punished, whereas for the sort of corruption which the Reverend Doctor has been describing, such as the obtaining of a pardon for<add>in the sense of</add> solicitation, friendship, <gap/>tiating and gratifying political attachments, and so forth, the danger of punishment can not be stated with a serious face.</note></p>  
as receipt of hard money for a <unclear>dastardly</unclear> <gap/> purpose)though in no <add>case</add> <note>-case very easy, for the Judge to be punished, whereas for the sort of corruption which the Reverend Doctor has been describing, such as the obtaining of a pardon for<add>in the sense of</add> solicitation, friendship, <gap/>tiating and gratifying political attachments, and so forth, the danger of punishment can not be stated with a serious face.</note></p> <pb/>





Revision as of 19:08, 13 May 2014


Click Here To Edit

1 Feb. 1809

Accordingly, to make the moresurer sure of presenting mistakes
when at the conclusion of this as of other sermons
a reflection or two under the stile and title of practical
comescame to be made, a diversion is created, andthe mind of the hearer is made
is effectually termed used. from all such ideas as those
of publicity and evidence. "Which reflections show"
(says he) - Well? what is it that they What do they shew? Had the word "known"
stood alone, what they might have been thought to show
would have been that the general rule acted under
the individual falls deemed to have come under that rule and
that the evidence by which the existence of these facts had been considered
as established there ought to be present to the
minds in which the knowledge in question is stated
as requisite to be planted. [+] But to the purpose of [+] This is what they might have been understoodthought to shew and the word known stood alone, this is what they might have been thoughtunderstood to shew
the Reverend Doctor and his system any any such conception
would have been fatal. Accordingly, and that, by the
show of severity the absence of efficiency might be
concealed from view, up starts a crime, the imputation of
which he makes as if he would fasten upon the objects
of his protectionfavour: " which reflections show (says he, that the admission
"of extrinsic or oblique considerations, in dispensing
"the power of pardon, is a crime in the authors and
"advisors of such unmerited particularly, of the same authors
with that of corruption in a Judge."

With Of the same nature, yes: with only one difference,
and that so slight, as in the account of the Reverend
Doctor to have been passed by as not worth notice: and this is viz.
that, for corruption in a Judge, it is in some cases possible, (such
as receipt of hard money for a dastardly purpose)though in no case -case very easy, for the Judge to be punished, whereas for the sort of corruption which the Reverend Doctor has been describing, such as the obtaining of a pardon forin the sense of solicitation, friendship, tiating and gratifying political attachments, and so forth, the danger of punishment can not be stated with a serious face.


---page break---






Identifier: | JB/107/260/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1809-01-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

260

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e59

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

35251

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in