JB/107/262/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/107/262/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
perhaps pay for the expence.</p>
perhaps pay for the expence.</p>


 
<p>But the first disease, <add>the local disease</add> <gap/> the mischief produced<lb/>
by the ill chosen punishment being <unclear>purely</unclear> <unclear>fastitious</unclear>, the<lb/>
universal disease<add>the consequence is - that</add> - the universal incl<gap/>y introduced<lb/>
by the intended<add>pretended</add> palliatives, - is altogether <del>void of use</del><add>without necessity<add>optimal and unnecessary</add></add>:<lb/>
The only pretence you have for introducing and keeping a<lb/>
foot the second disease is your keeping in fact the first:<lb/>
<gap/> to keep on foot the first, the mischief you do by <lb/>
keeping on foot the second will be void of all <unclear>pretence</unclear>.</p><pb/>





Revision as of 08:17, 20 May 2014

Click Here To Edit 28 Jan 1808 S.13.NL

Evid: Prosp. View Peines

But (says somebody) if considered in a general and
abstracted point of view these several modes of conduct, doeshas
not the end they have in view meritalso a claim to consideration?
and in consideration of that end is not softeningsome mitigation ddue to
the evasion conveyed by such haste denominations? names?

In this this apology In the apologies madepersecuted in this
str we see the mischief: - the mischief which it is the
object of this section to present in its genuinetrue colours.
A cloak made for the some of most pernicious abuses that
government or morality are susceptible of. Discuss in
a variety of pernicious forms called in, propriety and
wantonly called in, and diligently platedapplied, in the character
of a remedy.

Yes If the nature of the case admitted of us more
other remedy, the apology would have some weight,
and the advantage of taking an account of profit and
loss on both sides, loss from the first disease, and from the
second profit by lessening the mischiefsoftening the symptoms of the first, might
perhaps pay for the expence.

But the first disease, the local disease the mischief produced
by the ill chosen punishment being purely fastitious, the
universal diseasethe consequence is - that - the universal incly introduced
by the intendedpretended palliatives, - is altogether void of usewithout necessity<add>optimal and unnecessary</add>:
The only pretence you have for introducing and keeping a
foot the second disease is your keeping in fact the first:
to keep on foot the first, the mischief you do by
keeping on foot the second will be void of all pretence.


---page break---






Identifier: | JB/107/262/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 107.

Date_1

1808-01-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

107

Main Headings

law versus arbitrary power (a hatchet for dr paley's net)

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

peines

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e61

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

pr1

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

35253

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in