JB/051/316/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/316/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Ends
<note>Ends
C
C</note>
<head>Of the [purposes] of Procedure</head>
<head>Of the [purposes] of Procedure</head>


<p>to depend, as it has almost always hitherto been<lb/>
<p>to depend, as it has almost always hitherto been<lb/>
made to depend upon the pecuniary solvency of the offen-<lb/>
made to depend upon the <del><gap/></del> <add>pecuniary solvency</add> of the offender.<lb/> For <add>in general</add> the longer the delay is, the longer time<lb/>
der. For in general the longer the delay is, the longer time<lb/>
there is given for the <hi rend="underline">assets</hi> to be consumed.<lb/>
there is given for the assets to be consumed.<lb/>
If there be any exception to this rule, <add>three <gap/></add> <del><gap/><lb/> in the case</del> circumstances must concur to form it:<lb/>
If there be any exception to this rule, there is<lb/>
the assets must <add>consist solely </add> in the growing produce of the<lb/>
circumstances must concur to form it:<lb/>
offenders' labour: the punishment must be such<lb/>
the assets must consist solely in the growing produce of the<lb/>
as <sic>admitts</sic> of his carrying on that labour: and<lb/>
offenders' labour: the punishment must be such<lb/>
as admits of his carrying on that labour: and<lb/>
means must be provided for compelling him<lb/>  
means must be provided for compelling him<lb/>  
so to do.<lb/></p>  
so to do.<lb/></p>  


<note>6. In case of inno
<note>6. In case of innocence,<lb/> ground-
-cence, ground-
less<lb/> punishment.</note>
less punishment.</note>


20
20
<p>6. The case is much worse where the party
<p>6. The case is much worse where the party<lb/>
suspected and prosecuted actually turns out to
suspected and prosecuted actually turns out to<lb/>
be innocent. In this case the additional quantity of
be innocent. In this case the <del>punishment is</del> <add>additional quantity of</add><lb/>
suffering produced by the delay is
<add>suffering produced by the delay is</add><lb/>
not only superfluous, but fundamentally un-
not only superfluous, but fundamentally unjust<lb/> <add>and <hi rend="underline">groundless</hi>.</add> <del><gap/></del> It is not only in itself<lb/>
just and groundless. It is not only in itself
an evil, as is the case when it is simply<lb/>
an evil, as is the case when it is simply
superfluous: but it is pernicious in its consequences:<lb/> pernicious in virtue of the alarm which<lb/>
superfluous: but it is pernicious in its conse-
it inspires: similar to the alarm which is<lb/>
quenches: pernicious in virtue of the alarm which
it inspires: similar to the alarm which is  
propagated by a crime.</p>
propagated by a crime.</p>


<p>Refer this to jump in case 6 unusual punishment of ... .... Difference between
<p>Refer this to simple <gap/> 6. <add>unequal punishment of persons <add> innocent</add> &#x2014; Difference between<lb/>
Difference between alarm of an unjust ... ... ... ... .... ...
Difference between <add>alarm of an</add> unjust punishment. <foreign>dolo, culpa per infortunium</foreign>. This will come in after the ways in which the<lb/>
... Then will come in after the ways in which the  
Judge may fail have been considered.</p>  
Judge may fail have been considered.</p>  



Revision as of 10:18, 9 March 2015

Click Here To Edit

Ends C Of the [purposes] of Procedure

to depend, as it has almost always hitherto been
made to depend upon the pecuniary solvency of the offender.
For in general the longer the delay is, the longer time
there is given for the assets to be consumed.
If there be any exception to this rule, three
in the case
circumstances must concur to form it:
the assets must consist solely in the growing produce of the
offenders' labour: the punishment must be such
as admitts of his carrying on that labour: and
means must be provided for compelling him
so to do.

6. In case of innocence,
ground- less
punishment.

20

6. The case is much worse where the party
suspected and prosecuted actually turns out to
be innocent. In this case the punishment is additional quantity of
suffering produced by the delay is
not only superfluous, but fundamentally unjust
and groundless. It is not only in itself
an evil, as is the case when it is simply
superfluous: but it is pernicious in its consequences:
pernicious in virtue of the alarm which
it inspires: similar to the alarm which is
propagated by a crime.

Refer this to simple 6. unequal punishment of persons <add> innocent — Difference between
Difference between alarm of an unjust punishment. dolo, culpa per infortunium. This will come in after the ways in which the
Judge may fail have been considered.







This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/051/316/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

19-24, 1-3

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

316

Info in main headings field

of the purposes of procedure

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f17 / f18 / f19 / f20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::r williams [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

c. hamilton

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16481

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in