JB/106/275/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/275/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
Mexico, according to the plan here proposed, a sacrifice <lb/>
Mexico, according to the plan here proposed, a sacrifice <lb/>
to a certain amount will have to be made.</p>
to a certain amount will have to be made.</p>
<p>For its <hi rend="underline">direct</hi> object, this plan has the securing <lb/>
the establishment of the communication for the benefit of<lb/>
all nations without exception: and more particularly for<lb/>
the benefit of Mexico, Columbia and the Angle American<lb/>
States; these being the three nations to which local proximity<lb/>
will render it in a peculiar degree advantageous<del>:</del> <add>But more over</add> For<lb/>
its <hi rend="underline">collateral</hi> object, it has-the prevention of all that ill-will<lb/>
as between Mexico and Columbia, of which the possession of<lb/>
so great an advantage to Mexico, to the exclusioin of Columbia,<lb/>
<add>could scarcely, the nature of man considered, fail if being productive</add> backed by all the other nations of the earth. <note>Betwixt Mexico and Columbia?_With more propriety might it have been said-between Mexico on the one part, and the other part Columbia,</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 08:16, 3 August 2015

Click Here To Edit

1822. June 28.
Junctiana Proposal

Lake Nicaragua is included: and, if the information received
be correct, not only the contiguous land on the side
of Mexico is regarded as appertaining to Mexico but also
the contiguous land on the side of Columbia.

If this be not the case-if the claims or expectations
of Mexico do not embrace both sides, here ends
this difficulty. But, if they do embrace both sides, then it is
that the difficulty will have place: for, then it is that by
Mexico, according to the plan here proposed, a sacrifice
to a certain amount will have to be made.

For its direct object, this plan has the securing
the establishment of the communication for the benefit of
all nations without exception: and more particularly for
the benefit of Mexico, Columbia and the Angle American
States; these being the three nations to which local proximity
will render it in a peculiar degree advantageous: But more over For
its collateral object, it has-the prevention of all that ill-will
as between Mexico and Columbia, of which the possession of
so great an advantage to Mexico, to the exclusioin of Columbia,
could scarcely, the nature of man considered, fail if being productive backed by all the other nations of the earth. Betwixt Mexico and Columbia?_With more propriety might it have been said-between Mexico on the one part, and the other part Columbia,



Identifier: | JB/106/275/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1822-06-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

junctiana proposal

Folio number

275

Info in main headings field

junctiana proposal

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d11 / e4

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

34863

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in