JB/106/241/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/241/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>1817 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 13</head>
<head>1817 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 13</head>
<head>Liberty of the Press</head>
<head>Liberty of the Press</head>
<note>4 Art. 2 Reasons <!-- pencil note --></note>
<note>4 Art. 2 Reasons <!-- pencil note --></note><lb/>
7. That those in whose hands the exercise of the super<add>sovereign</add> powers<lb/>
<p>7. That those in whose hands the exercise of the super<add>sovereign</add> powers<lb/>
of government continues to be lodged should at the same <note>7 By the supposition to<add><del>to</del></add> <del>to</del> the check applied by the political or legal sanction the supreme power can not be subjected: but so far from being a reason why it should not, it is a conclusive reason why it should be subjected to the check applied by the popular or moral sanction </note> <lb/>
of government continues to be lodged should at the same <note>7 <lb/>
By the supposition, <lb/>
to<add><del>to</del></add> <del>to</del> the check applied <lb/>
by the political or legal <lb/>
sanction the supreme <lb/>
power can not be <lb/>
subjected: but so <lb/>
far from being a reason <lb/>
why it should <lb/>
not, it is a conclusive <lb/>
reason why <lb/>
it should be subjected <lb/>
to the check applied <lb/>
by the popular or <lb/>
moral sanction <!-- note in pencil --></note> <lb/>
hence be <del>punish in the way</del> of by a judicial authority<lb/>
hence be <del>punish in the way</del> of by a judicial authority<lb/>
placed in other hands  be <gap/> subject<add>liable</add> to be stopped<add>stayed</add><lb/>
placed in other hands  to review subject<add>liable</add> to be stopped<add>stayed</add><lb/>
in the exercise of such  the<gap/> power of punished for the<add>any</add> service<lb/>
in the exercise of such  <unclear>their</unclear> power or punished for the<add>any</add> service<lb/>
already made of it is not possible the supposition<lb/>
already made of it is not possible <add>for</add>the supposition<lb/>
is a self contradicting one.
is a self contradicting one. But <del>is there a reason
</del><add>the possibility</add><lb/>
<del>the application of a <add><gap/></add> remedy against misconduct</del> a<lb/>
of subjecting men to <del>the applic</del><add>in the situation in question a <sic>controul</sic></add> in the shape is it a<lb/>
reason why they should not be subjected to <sic>controul</sic> in<lb/>
any shape? On the contrary the more manifest it is that<lb/>
<gap/> <del>impossible</del> subjecting them to <sic>controul</sic> in this shape is not<lb/>
possible, the more manifest should <add>is</add> be the necessity<add>demand</add> of<lb/>
<gap/> being subjected to <sic>controul</sic> in whattsoever other shape<lb/>
the nature of things will <sic>admitt</sic> of their being subjected. <note><unclear>Go in</unclear></note></p>


8. To say that to the <gap/>ing of good conduct in the <note>8 To the receiving good conduct <gap/> of all imputation of bad conduct is not necessary <gap/> a <gap/> sub<gap/> self contradicting  to secure good conduct</note><lb/>





Revision as of 10:31, 14 December 2015

Click Here To Edit

1817 Decr 13 Liberty of the Press 4 Art. 2 Reasons

7. That those in whose hands the exercise of the supersovereign powers
of government continues to be lodged should at the same 7
By the supposition,
toto to the check applied
by the political or legal
sanction the supreme
power can not be
subjected: but so
far from being a reason
why it should
not, it is a conclusive
reason why
it should be subjected
to the check applied
by the popular or
moral sanction

hence be punish in the way of by a judicial authority
placed in other hands to review subjectliable to be stoppedstayed
in the exercise of such their power or punished for theany service
already made of it is not possible forthe supposition
is a self contradicting one. But is there a reason the possibility
the application of a remedy against misconduct a
of subjecting men to the applicin the situation in question a controul in the shape is it a
reason why they should not be subjected to controul in
any shape? On the contrary the more manifest it is that
impossible subjecting them to controul in this shape is not
possible, the more manifest should is be the necessitydemand of
being subjected to controul in whattsoever other shape
the nature of things will admitt of their being subjected. Go in

8. To say that to the ing of good conduct in the 8 To the receiving good conduct of all imputation of bad conduct is not necessary a sub self contradicting to secure good conduct




Identifier: | JB/106/241/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1817-12-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-9

Box

106

Main Headings

liberty of the press

Folio number

241

Info in main headings field

liberty of the press

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

34829

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in