★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
it appears by the same fiction, he<lb/> | it appears by the same fiction, he<lb/> | ||
means, being <add><unclear>felonously</unclear></add>guilty. [of Felony,<lb/>that is of Larceny.]</note><lb/> | means, being <add><unclear>felonously</unclear></add>guilty. [of Felony,<lb/>that is of Larceny.]</note><lb/> | ||
<p>If we believe the same Serg<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> Hawkins speaking in the next page from his<lb/> | |||
Authorities, it Ca<gap/> opening a Bank and taking out a part with intent to steal <add>things</add><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">may</hi> . <gap/>ing possession here <gap/> to possession <add>are</add> within another<lb/> | |||
Nowin both these cases, by the supposition was <add>is</add> the <add>original </add> taking the same, and means<lb/> | |||
of them a trespass.</p> | |||
<p>If it be said on his behalf, that in the case last part he means not the origin<lb/> | |||
taking <add>of the whole</add> which was no trespass, but the partial taking [which <add>according</add> in the idea here <add>attributed </add> <gap/><lb/> | |||
<add>to him</add> ], besides that the Idea of <add>++</add> two takings one within another is not very satisfactory <add>I</add><lb/> | |||
see not here this second taking can be kept <add>contra-distinct</add> clear from the "carrying away", <add>to</add> who<lb/> | |||
my apprehension necessarily includes it.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
LARCENY EMBEZZLEMENT
After having thus endeavour'd to establish a comprehensiblean intelligible distinction between these tw crimes
it will be edifying to observe how they have been confounded —
If we believe Serj.t Hawkins speaking from his Judgement + — " If a pad
be guilty or no Trespass in taking the Goods, he cannot be guilty of Felony" in carrying them away"<add>[+]</add>
+ 1. Hawk, 89-SS2.
[+] and agreeable to this he observes SS3 (speaks)
f and for this he cites a decision an authority) that "a
"Carrier who receives Goods in order"
"to carry them to a certain place, "
"cannot be said to steal them,"
by imbezzeling of them afterwards."
now by stbr being said to steal them
it appears by the same fiction, he
means, being felonouslyguilty. [of Felony,
that is of Larceny.]
If we believe the same Sergt. Hawkins speaking in the next page from his
Authorities, it Ca opening a Bank and taking out a part with intent to steal things
may . ing possession here to possession are within another
Nowin both these cases, by the supposition was is the original taking the same, and means
of them a trespass.
If it be said on his behalf, that in the case last part he means not the origin
taking of the whole which was no trespass, but the partial taking [which according in the idea here attributed
to him ], besides that the Idea of ++ two takings one within another is not very satisfactory I
see not here this second taking can be kept contra-distinct clear from the "carrying away", to who
my apprehension necessarily includes it.
|
Identifier: | JB/070/228/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
070 |
of laws in general |
||
|
228 |
larceny embezzlement |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
23343 |
|||
