JB/011/147/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/147/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829. Aug.11<lb/>Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peel<lb/> His Acts</note></p> <p><note>10<lb/> Notes on unrepealed<lb/>parts without reference<lb/> <add>given</add> or authority stated</note></p> <p> <foreign> <gap/> supran</foreign> <unclear>issue</unclear> <!-- number in pencil --> 5</p> <p> At the bottom of the page <add>at</add> utmost the repealing Section<lb/> <del><gap/></del> taken in commencement &#x2014; appear in a type of a <lb/> reduced size, preceded by &#x2014; an asterisk* three lines of which<lb/> what more follows is a <gap/>  *The author has added<lb/> by way of note to the Statutes which are <hi rend="underline">partially</hi> repealed,<lb/> the substance of those Statutes which still remain <hi rend="underline">unrepealed</hi>,<lb/> and applicable to the administration of the criminal laws.<lb/> By the asterisk here we are of course bid to look for <del>the</del> a<lb/> corresponding interest above no such <del><gap/></del> mark <add><unclear>reading</unclear></add> of <lb/><add> relative</add> reference is to be found.  "<hi rend="underline">The Author</hi>" where is he who<lb/> while we should be curious to see him.  His Majesty<lb/> sitting on his throne in the Parliament he is <add>was</add> the <unclear>ruin</unclear> of<lb/> a man the vice <gap/> of God <add> God upon <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/></add> he <gap/> the man in whom<lb/> we should have repented to him sin the <gap/> of this are<lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> Statutes.  But since it can not be his <gap/><lb/> Majesty who else can it be. Shall we say M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel himself<lb/> shall <del><gap/><gap/></del> we say the <del><gap/></del> present Writer of the Lunda <gap/>?</p> <p><note>11<lb/> Materials &amp; workmanship<lb/> vying with<lb/> each other</note></p> <p> Already we see the <del>wor</del> materials and the workmanship<lb/> vying with each other.  <foreign> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></foreign> shall<lb/> we say or <foreign><gap/> superavit <gap/></foreign>?  <del>whatever</del> be whatever<lb/> the <gap/> belongs &#x2014; whatever is uppermost it can not be <gap/> <add> are they as undisputed</add> <lb/> that they are with <gap/>.</p> <p> <note>12<lb/> If these Statutes such<lb/> that Coaches &amp; six may<lb/> be driven through<lb/> them Hamond should<lb/> be recalled to make<lb/> the necessary repairs</note></p> <p>One use to which we have heard this group of Statutes<lb/> <del>was</del> spoken of as destined is &#x2014; the having <del>s</del> Coaches and six<lb/> driven through them.  If <del>this effect be</del> it be without design<lb/> that this property has been found belonging to them, we would venture<lb/> to propose that Mr Hamond should be called back<lb/> from his exile, <del>to work</del> then his <unclear><add>expressed</add> hand</unclear> may be pleased the<lb/> business of making the necessary repairs.</p>   
<head>1829. Aug.11<lb/>Reformists reviewed.</head> <p><note>Peel<lb/> His Acts</note></p> <p><note>10<lb/> Notes on unrepealed<lb/>parts without reference<lb/> <add>given</add> or authority stated</note></p> <p> <foreign> <gap/> supran</foreign> <unclear>issue</unclear> <!-- number in pencil --> 5</p> <p> At the bottom of the page <add>at</add> utmost the repealing Section<lb/> <del><gap/></del> taken in commencement &#x2014; appear in a type of a <lb/> reduced size, preceded by &#x2014; an asterisk* three lines of which<lb/> what more follows is a <unclear>repeat</unclear>  *The author has added<lb/> by way of note to the Statutes which are <hi rend="underline">partially</hi> repealed,<lb/> the substance of those Statutes which still remain <hi rend="underline">unrepealed</hi>,<lb/> and applicable to the administration of the criminal laws.<lb/> By the asterisk here we are of course bid to look for <del>the</del> a<lb/> corresponding interest above no such <del><gap/></del> mark <add><unclear>reading</unclear></add> of <lb/><add> relative</add> reference is to be found.  "<hi rend="underline">The Author</hi>" where is he who<lb/> while we should be curious to see him.  His Majesty<lb/> sitting on his throne in the Parliament he is <add>was</add> the <unclear>ruin</unclear> of<lb/> a man the vice <gap/> of God <add> God upon <gap/> <gap/> be <gap/></add> he <gap/> the man in whom<lb/> we should have repented to him sin the <gap/> of this are<lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> Statutes.  But since it can not be his <gap/><lb/> Majesty who else can it be. Shall we say M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Peel himself<lb/> shall <del><gap/><gap/></del> we say the <del><gap/></del> present Writer of the Lunda <gap/>?</p> <p><note>11<lb/> Materials &amp; workmanship<lb/> vying with<lb/> each other</note></p> <p> Already we see the <del>wor</del> materials and the workmanship<lb/> vying with each other.  <foreign> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></foreign> shall<lb/> we say or <foreign><gap/> superavit <gap/></foreign>?  <del>whatever</del> to whatever<lb/> the <gap/> belongs &#x2014; whatever is uppermost it can not be denied <add> are they as undisputed</add> <lb/> that they are with <gap/>.</p> <p> <note>12<lb/> If these Statutes such<lb/> that Coaches &amp; six may<lb/> be driven through<lb/> them Hamond should<lb/> be recalled to make<lb/> the necessary repairs</note></p> <p>One use to which we have heard this group of Statutes<lb/> <del>was</del> spoken of as destined is &#x2014; the having <del>s</del> Coaches and six<lb/> driven through them.  If <del>this effect be</del> it be without design<lb/> that this property has been found belonging to them, we would venture<lb/> to propose that Mr Hamond should be called back<lb/> from his exile, <del>to work</del> then his <unclear><add>expressed</add> hand</unclear> may be pleased the<lb/> business of making the necessary repairs.</p>   





Revision as of 09:27, 23 November 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829. Aug.11
Reformists reviewed.

Peel
His Acts

10
Notes on unrepealed
parts without reference
given or authority stated

supran issue 5

At the bottom of the page at utmost the repealing Section
taken in commencement — appear in a type of a
reduced size, preceded by — an asterisk* three lines of which
what more follows is a repeat *The author has added
by way of note to the Statutes which are partially repealed,
the substance of those Statutes which still remain unrepealed,
and applicable to the administration of the criminal laws.
By the asterisk here we are of course bid to look for the a
corresponding interest above no such mark reading of
relative reference is to be found. "The Author" where is he who
while we should be curious to see him. His Majesty
sitting on his throne in the Parliament he is was the ruin of
a man the vice of God God upon be he the man in whom
we should have repented to him sin the of this are
in Statutes. But since it can not be his
Majesty who else can it be. Shall we say Mr Peel himself
shall we say the present Writer of the Lunda ?

11
Materials & workmanship
vying with
each other

Already we see the wor materials and the workmanship
vying with each other. shall
we say or superavit ? whatever to whatever
the belongs — whatever is uppermost it can not be denied are they as undisputed
that they are with .

12
If these Statutes such
that Coaches & six may
be driven through
them Hamond should
be recalled to make
the necessary repairs

One use to which we have heard this group of Statutes
was spoken of as destined is — the having s Coaches and six
driven through them. If this effect be it be without design
that this property has been found belonging to them, we would venture
to propose that Mr Hamond should be called back
from his exile, to work then his expressed hand may be pleased the
business of making the necessary repairs.




Identifier: | JB/011/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

10-12

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

147

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3844

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in