★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1823. May 25<lb/> | |||
<del>Constitution Code</del> Fallacies and Penal Code. Cruelty to animals.</head> | |||
<note><foreign>ad Judicum</foreign>?<lb/> | |||
Diversion-creating</note> | |||
<p><!-- This paragraph in pencil --> J. B. to P. B. Is this worth looking at</p> | |||
<p>Diversion-creator's fallacy — Why this? why not<lb/> | |||
that?</p> | |||
<p>Is or is not this upon the list of Fallacies</p> | |||
<p>Example. In H. of Commons Friday 23 May 1823<lb/> | |||
or thereabout <add><unclear>Markes</unclear></add> Animal-cruely preventing Bill thrown<lb/> | |||
out. Brougham against it Why punish dog-fighting<lb/> | |||
and Bull baiting when don't punish Hare-hunting<lb/> | |||
Fox hunting and Shooting.</p> | |||
<p>Thus In an <unclear>Excursus</unclear> of Friday 23 May<lb/> | |||
laud of this speech of Broughams defending dog-fighting<lb/> | |||
and Bull-baiting as being sports of the poor</p> | |||
<p>Thus because they could not get one good thing<lb/> | |||
done they would not suffer <add>to be done</add> another good thing which<lb/> | |||
but for this unprincipled opposition might have been<lb/> | |||
done.. For a former Bill <add>on this subject</add>, how inadequate soever<lb/> | |||
to its purpose, was passed into an Act.</p> | |||
<p>Answer</p> | |||
<p>The mischief accruing to man, — by suffering it to be tacitly<lb/> | |||
laid down as to principle of legislation that the rich may<lb/> | |||
be indulged in any enormity, the poor alone are<lb/> | |||
to be repressed, — In exasperation occasioned to the<lb/> | |||
poor by such barefaced partiality, — more than outweighs<lb/> | |||
the amount of good proposed to <hi rend="underline">animals</hi> by such a<lb/> | |||
partial measure.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1823. May 25
Constitution Code Fallacies and Penal Code. Cruelty to animals.
ad Judicum?
Diversion-creating
J. B. to P. B. Is this worth looking at
Diversion-creator's fallacy — Why this? why not
that?
Is or is not this upon the list of Fallacies
Example. In H. of Commons Friday 23 May 1823
or thereabout Markes Animal-cruely preventing Bill thrown
out. Brougham against it Why punish dog-fighting
and Bull baiting when don't punish Hare-hunting
Fox hunting and Shooting.
Thus In an Excursus of Friday 23 May
laud of this speech of Broughams defending dog-fighting
and Bull-baiting as being sports of the poor
Thus because they could not get one good thing
done they would not suffer to be done another good thing which
but for this unprincipled opposition might have been
done.. For a former Bill on this subject, how inadequate soever
to its purpose, was passed into an Act.
Answer
The mischief accruing to man, — by suffering it to be tacitly
laid down as to principle of legislation that the rich may
be indulged in any enormity, the poor alone are
to be repressed, — In exasperation occasioned to the
poor by such barefaced partiality, — more than outweighs
the amount of good proposed to animals by such a
partial measure.
|
Identifier: | JB/104/328/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1823-05-25 |
|||
|
104 |
fallacies |
||
|
328 |
fallacies and penal code cruelty to animals |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1822 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1822 |
|||
|
"jb to pb is this worth looking at?" |
34299 |
||
