JB/002/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/111/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:




under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!
<!-- please note that the folio has been deleted vertically (in the 2 main sections of the folio body). Delete tags have therefore been added at the beginning of the first paragraph, and at the end of the last paragraph. Amend as necessary if you do not wish these to show in the final production. -->


<head>27</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<head><sic>Employd</sic>  <!-- white space --> <note>Notes</note></head><!-- heading and note in pencil -->
<head><note>Annuity Notes</note></head><!-- written in pencil -->


<p>[12] [... <hi rend='underline'>His Majesty's Exchequer</hi>]  In the <del><unclear>whole</unclear></del> <add>case of the</add>
<p><note>Ch. 2.  <unclear>Form</unclear> Notes</note><!-- written in pencil --> <note>[12]  Propriety of employing the Kings <unclear>name</unclear> &#x2014; though not <sic>employ'd</sic> in an Exchequer Bill</note><!-- note in pencil -->  [12] [... <hi rend='underline'>His Majesty's Exchequer</hi>]  In the <del>whole</del> <add>case of the</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>form of an</del> Exchequer Bill , or circumstances remarkable  
<del>form of an</del> Exchequer Bill, or circumstances remarkable  
<lb/>
<lb/>
enough is &#x2014;that in the whole <unclear>tenor</unclear> of  
enough is &#x2014; that in the whole tenor of  
<lb/>
<lb/>
the instrument no mention of the regal office&#x2014;
the instrument no mention of the regal office&#x2014;
Line 18: Line 21:
&#x2014; <add>no recognition</add> of the sovereign authority of which that of the  
&#x2014; <add>no recognition</add> of the sovereign authority of which that of the  
<lb/>
<lb/>
Auditor is but an <gap/> is <add>happens any where </add> any where to
Auditor is but an <gap/> is any where <add>happens any where </add> to
<lb/>
<lb/>
be found : <add>to present itself:</add>  &#x2014; for the mention of it <del><gap/></del> unavoidably  
be found: <add>to present itself:</add>  &#x2014; for the mention of it <del><gap/></del> unavoidably  
<lb/>
<lb/>
intended in the reference <del>of</del> to the Act of  
included in the reference <del>of</del> to the Act of  
<lb/>
<lb/>
Parliament <del>is scarce to be regarded as an</del> <add>can scarcely be quoted in this view</add>
Parliament <del>is scarce to be regarded as an</del> <add>can scarcely be quoted in this view</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>instance .</del> <del>t</del>The <add>duration of sort of</add> annuity there in question being
<del>instance.</del> <del>t</del>The <add>duration of <unclear>sort</unclear> of</add> annuity there in question being
<lb/>
<lb/>
so fugitive , whole in the present instance it  
so fugitive, whole in the present instance it  
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>is capable of being</del> <add>may eventually be</add> perpetual , the omission of this
<del>is capable of being</del> <add>may eventually be</add> perpetual, the omission of this
<lb/>
<lb/>
constitutional homage is not , it is true , of so
constitutional homage is not, it is true, of so
<lb/>
<lb/>
much importance <add><hi rend='underline'>there</hi></add> as it would be <hi rend='underline'>here</hi> .  If the
much importance as <add><hi rend='underline'>there</hi></add> it would be <hi rend='underline'>here</hi>.  If the
<lb/>
<lb/>
credit of the paper here proposed to be created
credit of the paper here proposed to be created
Line 40: Line 43:
was to be regarded as capable of outliving
was to be regarded as capable of outliving
<lb/>
<lb/>
the regal authority , it would <del><gap/> <unclear>&amp;c</unclear> an</del> <add>so far from being an additional advantage</add> in
the regal authority, it would <del>not be an</del> <add>so far from being an additional advantage</add> in
<lb/>
<lb/>
the eye of a loyal subject be <del>an ad</del> a defect.
the eye of a loyal subject be <del>an ad</del> a defect.
<lb/>
For among the effects of the proposed
<lb/>
measure an advantage, which, though a collateral
<lb/>
one, is surely not among the last considerable
<lb/>
ones, is &#x2014; the extending to the <del>lower</del> <add>inferior</add> that is to
<lb/>
the <add>most</add> numerous classes of the people, that interest
<lb/>
in the continuence of <add><unclear><sic>inherant</sic></unclear></add> peace and <del>quietness</del> <add>happiness</add>,
<lb/>
which as far as property in the existing
<lb/>
funds extends is already possessed by their
<lb/>
superiors.
<lb/></p>
<!-- horizontal line -->


<head>Note</head><!-- right of centre, and in pencil -->
<p>(a)<!-- '(a)' in pencil -->  Apply this <gap/> to the case of British India:
<lb/>
where, the natural bonds of connection between governors
<lb/>
and governed being so much the weaker, the demand
<lb/>
for <del><gap/></del> factitious lies, for every lie that can be <unclear>decisive</unclear>,
<lb/>
is so much the more urgent
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 111 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit



27 Employd Notes Annuity Notes

Ch. 2. Form Notes [12] Propriety of employing the Kings name — though not employ'd in an Exchequer Bill [12] [... His Majesty's Exchequer] In the whole case of the
form of an Exchequer Bill, or circumstances remarkable
enough is — that in the whole tenor of
the instrument no mention of the regal office—
no recognition of the sovereign authority of which that of the
Auditor is but an is any where happens any where to
be found: to present itself: — for the mention of it unavoidably
included in the reference of to the Act of
Parliament is scarce to be regarded as an can scarcely be quoted in this view
instance. tThe duration of sort of annuity there in question being
so fugitive, whole in the present instance it
is capable of being may eventually be perpetual, the omission of this
constitutional homage is not, it is true, of so
much importance as there it would be here. If the
credit of the paper here proposed to be created
was to be regarded as capable of outliving
the regal authority, it would not be an so far from being an additional advantage in
the eye of a loyal subject be an ad a defect.
For among the effects of the proposed
measure an advantage, which, though a collateral
one, is surely not among the last considerable
ones, is — the extending to the lower inferior that is to
the most numerous classes of the people, that interest
in the continuence of inherant peace and quietness happiness,
which as far as property in the existing
funds extends is already possessed by their
superiors.


Note

(a) Apply this to the case of British India:
where, the natural bonds of connection between governors
and governed being so much the weaker, the demand
for factitious lies, for every lie that can be decisive,
is so much the more urgent




Identifier: | JB/002/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[12] [sic]]]

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f27

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…>m 1798

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

[[notes_public::"employ'd" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

850

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in