JB/002/115/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

3

3 Annuity Notes Ch Form Notes The two plans— the one in use <add>commonly most trusted to</add> and the one
proposed — being much different — not in detail
only, but in principle — to mark the variance difference
a pair of contrasted appellations may be of use.
The one I would term the ensnaring plan;—
the other, the repulsive preventive or obstructive. All secret marks
are of the ensnaring kind: the same term
may even be applied, where without employing
any secret marks specially directed to that end,
the reliance is that on the probability that
in the assemblage of this and points of which the
tenor of the instrument is composed, the eye or
hand of an imitator be may err may be at a fault
in some mistake or other which a careful
scrutiny examination will bring to notice. The expedients
here prepared (of which this is but one out of
several) are all of them of a an obstructive and as it wererepulsive tendency,
The aim is — to present the resolution
as incapable of being attempted with
any the smallest probability of success.

Identifier: \| JB/002/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	002	Main Headings	annuity notes
Folio number	115	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e3 / f31
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	<…>m 1798
Marginals		Paper Producer	frances wright
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1798
Notes public		ID Number	854
Box Contents

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p><unclear>Per two plans</unclear>&#x2014; <unclear>that</unclear> are <add>commonly most trusted to</add> in <unclear>use</unclear> and <unclear>that</unclear> are<lb/> prepared &#x2014; being much different &#x2014; not in detail<lb/> only, but in principle &#x2014; to mark the <del>variance</del> <add>difference</add> <lb/> a pair of contrasted appellations may be of <unclear>use</unclear>.<lb/> The one I would term the <hi rend='underline'>ensuring</hi> plan,-<lb/>the other, the <del><hi rend='underline'>repulsion</hi></del> <add>prevention or <hi rend='underline'>obstruction</hi></add>. All <hi rend='underline'><gap/></hi> marks<lb/>
+<head>3</head>
-use of the <hi rend='underline'>ensuring</hi> <gap/>: the same term<lb/>may even be applied, where without employing<lb/>
-any <del><unclear>accent</unclear></del>marks specially directed to that and,<lb/>the <unclear>reliance</unclear> is <del><gap/></del> on the probability that<lb/>in the assemblage of this and parts of which the<lb/>
+<p><note>3 Annuity Notes
-tenor of the instrument is compared, the eye or<lb/> hand of an imitator <del>be</del><add>may err</add> may <add>be</add> at a fault<lb/>in some mistake or error which a careful<lb/><add>scrutiny</add><gap/>will bring to notice. The <gap/><lb/>
+Ch Form
-been prepared (of which this is but one out<lb/>of several) use all of <unclear>them</unclear> of a <add>an observation<gap/>as it were</add><hi rend='underline'></hi>repulsion tendency,<lb/> The aim is &#x2014; to present the issue<lb/>between us incapable of being attempted with any <add>the smallest</add> probability of success.</p>
+Notes</note>
+The two plans&#x2014; the one in use <add><add>commonly</add> most trusted to</add> and the one<lb/> proposed &#x2014; being much different &#x2014; not in detail<lb/> only, but in principle &#x2014; to mark the <del>variance</del> <add>difference</add><lb/> a pair of contrasted appellations may be of use.<lb/> The one I would term the <hi rend='underline'>ensnaring</hi> plan;&#x2014;<lb/>the other, the <del><hi rend='underline'>repulsive</hi></del> <add>preventive or <hi rend='underline'>obstructive</hi></add>. All <hi rend='underline'>secret</hi> marks<lb/> are of the <hi rend='underline'>ensnaring</hi> kind: the same term<lb/>may even be applied, where without employing<lb/>
+any <del>secret</del> marks specially directed to that end,<lb/>the reliance is <del>that</del> on the probability that<lb/>in the assemblage of this and points of which the<lb/>
+tenor of the instrument is composed, the eye or<lb/> hand of an imitator <del>be</del> <add>may err</add> may <add>be</add> at a fault<lb/>in some mistake or other which a careful<lb/><add>scrutiny</add> examination will bring to notice. The expedients<lb/> here
+prepared (of which this is but one out of<lb/> several) are all of them of a <add>an obstructive and as it were</add><hi rend='underline'>repulsive</hi> tendency,<lb/> The aim is &#x2014; to present the resolution<lb/>as incapable of being attempted with<lb/> any <add>the smallest</add> probability of success.</p>
@@ Line 14: / Line 18: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/002/115/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search