JB/002/116/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/116/001: Difference between revisions

Snefnug (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


In the present state of the art<add><gap/><gap/></add>, the expense<lb/>of this <unclear>annuity</unclear> would be considerable. The <unclear>number</unclear><lb/>of copies capable of being <gap/> of form<lb/>a copper plate without prejudice to that <gap/><lb/>on which the density may in some manner<lb/>depend is <gap/>: <gap/> for example 800 or 1000<lb/><gap/>then comes in on occasion for applying to on<lb/>a very ingenious invention which hitherto, for<lb/>want of such an occasion seems to have remained<lb/>unapplied <del>and unnoticed</del><add><gap/></add>. I mean the<lb/><gap/> whereby <del>engineering</del><add>designs</add>, <unclear>supposedly</unclear> <unclear>expounded</unclear> on<lb/>copper, an
<head>Annuity Notes</head>
 
<p>In the present state of the art<add><unclear>Mrs Grumby</unclear></add>, the expense<lb/>of this security would be considerable. The number<lb/>of copies capable of being worked off from<lb/>a copper plate without prejudice to that sharpness<lb/>on which the density may in some manner<lb/>depend is limited: say for example. 800 or 1000.<lb/>How this comes in on occasion for applying to on<lb/>a very ingenious invention which hitherto, for<lb/>want of such an occasion seems to have remained<lb/>unapplied <del>and unnoticed</del><add><gap/></add>. I mean the<lb/>art whereby <del>engravings</del><add>designs</add>, originally engraved on<lb/>copper, are <!-- symbol --> <note><!-- symbol -->by means of an intermediate mould</note> transferred to glass &#x2014; a material<lb/>much less copied (it is said) <unclear>to</unclear> ware, in a<lb/>state fit for furnishing impressions &#x2014; <del>and</del> in a<lb/><add>state of sharpness &#x2014;(it is said)&#x2014;and</add>numbers adequate to this or any other purpose.<lb/><add>A <unclear>reprinted</unclear></add>An account of this invention may be seen in<lb/> Nicholson's Journal for May 1st 1798 No 15: being<lb/> there reprinted from a paper circulated by<lb/> the Author Mr. Professor William of Glasgow with<lb/>specimens which I have seen and heard spoken<lb/> of by <add>artists</add> as adequate to the performance of<lb/>what is promised. It is there spoken of as a reassurance<lb/><add>security</add>against forgery: but in which way it is<lb/>proposed to operate in that character is not mentioned.<lb/> "High <del><sic>embellishm</sic></del> elaboration"..."collateral<lb/> embellishment...and "peculiar manner of some<lb/>"eminent master...are <unclear>here</unclear> recommended for that<lb/>purpose: but that the subject should be the<lb/>portrait of a living <unclear>person</unclear> is not said.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 116 001.jpg

Annuity Notes

In the present state of the artMrs Grumby, the expense
of this security would be considerable. The number
of copies capable of being worked off from
a copper plate without prejudice to that sharpness
on which the density may in some manner
depend is limited: say for example. 800 or 1000.
How this comes in on occasion for applying to on
a very ingenious invention which hitherto, for
want of such an occasion seems to have remained
unapplied and unnoticed. I mean the
art whereby engravingsdesigns, originally engraved on
copper, are by means of an intermediate mould transferred to glass — a material
much less copied (it is said) to ware, in a
state fit for furnishing impressions — and in a
state of sharpness —(it is said)—andnumbers adequate to this or any other purpose.
A reprintedAn account of this invention may be seen in
Nicholson's Journal for May 1st 1798 No 15: being
there reprinted from a paper circulated by
the Author Mr. Professor William of Glasgow with
specimens which I have seen and heard spoken
of by artists as adequate to the performance of
what is promised. It is there spoken of as a reassurance
securityagainst forgery: but in which way it is
proposed to operate in that character is not mentioned.
"High embellishm elaboration"..."collateral
embellishment...and "peculiar manner of some
"eminent master...are here recommended for that
purpose: but that the subject should be the
portrait of a living person is not said.



Identifier: | JB/002/116/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

116

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4 / f32

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…>m 1798

Marginals

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

855

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in