JB/002/118/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/118/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


<p>The use of the legend is &#x2014; to give room for the<lb/>framing of the prohibition in such a <add>sort</add> manner,<lb/>that <del>the question</del>, in case of prosecution, the<lb/>question whether the prohibition was meant to be<lb/>contravened, or no may be the less liable <add>open</add> to dispute  
<p>The use of the legend is &#x2014; to give room for the<lb/>framing of the prohibition in such a <add>sort</add> manner,<lb/>that <del>the question</del>, in case of prosecution, the<lb/>question whether the prohibition was meant to be<lb/>contravened, or no may be the less liable <add>open</add> to dispute  
<lb/>Resemblance, real or intended, will always be more <lb/>or less open to dispute; dimensions (taking sufficient<lb/>latitude) dimensions and the <del>insertion</del> existence<lb/> of a legend to a certain effect around the supposed<lb/>portrait may be so described as to be <add>altogether</add> insusceptible<lb/><add>clear of</add> dispute.<lb/></p><p>An answer may now be <add>is now</add>in readiness to be given to<lb/>the question why the Auditor of the Exchequer<lb/>is chosen for the subject of the portrait rather than<lb/>an indifferent person, <add>a person at large</add> &#x2014; the Chancellor of the<lb/>Exchequer, or the Sovereign in the throne.<lb/>The Auditor in contradistinction to a stranger &#x2014;<lb/>as being an officer of high rank &#x2014; <del>one officer</del> <add>and one</add> whose<lb/>office is connected with the service. As <del>it lies</del><add>it appertains</add>  <lb/>within<add>to</add>to his department, to give the instrument<lb/>his signature, the portrait is but <del>a</del> natural<lb/>accompaniment to that signature.  The paper in<lb/>question is a species of <add>money</add> <del>coinage the issue</del> of <lb/>which it belongs to his department to superintend<lb/> the coinage. In the <add>case</add> instance of <gap/> money<lb/> the image of the Sovereign stands <add>as it were</add> in <add>the place</add> lieu of<lb/>signature.<lb/></p> <pb/>
<lb/>Resemblance, real or intended, will always be more <lb/>or less open to dispute; dimensions (taking sufficient<lb/>latitude) dimensions and the <del>insertion</del> existence<lb/> of a legend to a certain effect around the supposed<lb/>portrait may be so described as to be <add>altogether</add> insusceptible<lb/><add>clear of</add> dispute.<lb/></p>
 
<p>An answer is now <add>may now be</add> in readiness to be given to<lb/>the question why the Auditor of the Exchequer<lb/>is chosen for the subject of the portrait rather than<lb/>an indifferent person, <add>a person at large</add> &#x2014; the Chancellor of the<lb/>Exchequer, or the Sovereign in the throne.</p>
 
<p>The Auditor in contradistinction to a stranger &#x2014;<lb/>as being an officer of high rank &#x2014; <del>an officer</del> <add>and one</add> whose<lb/>office is connected with the service. As <del>it lies</del> <add>it appertains</add>  <lb/><add>to</add> within to his department, to give the instrument<lb/>his signature, the portrait is but <del>an</del> natural<lb/>accompaniment to that signature.  The paper in<lb/>question is a species of <del>coinage the issue</del> <add>money</add> of <lb/>which it belongs to his department to superintend<lb/> the coinage. In the <add>case</add> instance of metallic money<lb/> the image of the Sovereign stands <add>as it were</add> in <add>the place</add> lieu of<lb/>signature.</p>  




Line 14: Line 18:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 118 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit

The use of the legend is — to give room for the
framing of the prohibition in such a sort manner,
that the question, in case of prosecution, the
question whether the prohibition was meant to be
contravened, or no may be the less liable open to dispute
Resemblance, real or intended, will always be more
or less open to dispute; dimensions (taking sufficient
latitude) dimensions and the insertion existence
of a legend to a certain effect around the supposed
portrait may be so described as to be altogether insusceptible
clear of dispute.

An answer is now may now be in readiness to be given to
the question why the Auditor of the Exchequer
is chosen for the subject of the portrait rather than
an indifferent person, a person at large — the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, or the Sovereign in the throne.

The Auditor in contradistinction to a stranger —
as being an officer of high rank — an officer and one whose
office is connected with the service. As it lies it appertains
to within to his department, to give the instrument
his signature, the portrait is but an natural
accompaniment to that signature. The paper in
question is a species of coinage the issue money of
which it belongs to his department to superintend
the coinage. In the case instance of metallic money
the image of the Sovereign stands as it were in the place lieu of
signature.



This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/002/118/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

118

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6 / f34

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…>m 1798

Marginals

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

857

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in