JB/002/141/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/141/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>6</head>
<head>6</head>


<p>the lowness of the <add>proposed</add> rate of interest <del>proposed <gap/> <lb/>hoard in their </del> imposed with the <add>now current</add> rate at present<lb/> current, <add>(concerning which see <del><gap/></del>)</add> the exercise of such a power is an event <lb/>that presents itself as neither probable nor desirable.</p>
<p>the lowness of the <add>proposed</add> rate of interest <del>proposed to be <gap/> <lb/>hoard another </del> imposed with the <add>now current</add> rate at present<lb/> current, <add>(concerning which see <del><gap/></del>)</add> the exercise of such a power is an event <lb/>that presents itself as neither probable nor desirable.</p>


<p>F</p>
<p>F</p>


<p>[11][<del>AT the above office</del> [<hi rend='underline'>May be received Yearly</hi>] Whether<lb/> the dividends shall be receivable <hi rend='underline'>Yearly</hi> only, as here <lb/>proposed, or half yearly, is a question to be decided <lb/>upon by the proper Judges. &#x2014; The advantages attending<lb/> the less frequent period of payment, supposing<lb/> it practicable, are <del>so</del> obvious enough: 1 the<lb/> trouble and thence the expence of payment not above<lb/> half as good as in the other case: 2. In the other<lb/> case, the plan for exhibiting the daily value for the<lb/> purpose of a prompt and commodious currency <lb/>would <add><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi></add><lb/> <note> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> instead of being simple to a degree that will presently be perceived,</note><lb/> be <add>a <gap/></add> complicated &#x2014; <del>more</del> much more so<lb/> than might at first glance be supposed. If therefore <lb/>the public would accept of the yearly mode<lb/> instead of the half yearly mode which it <gap/> <lb/>in regard to the Stocks has rendered the <gap/> customary <lb/>ones, it would be a considerable advantage. <lb/>Reasons for expecting this acquiescence are not <lb/> wanting. 1. The <gap/> of the sum would <lb/>operate as an inducement: and the <gap/> in<lb/> the instance of Exchequer Bills affords a precedent<lb/> in point or very nearly so. From the <del>year</del> <add>day</add> of <lb/>opening to the day of payment is frequently a<lb/> <del>tweil</del> twelvemonth or very little short of it. </p>
<p>[11][<del>AT the above office</del> [<hi rend='underline'>May be received Yearly</hi>] Whether<lb/> the dividends shall be receivable <hi rend='underline'>Yearly</hi> only, as here <lb/>proposed, or half yearly, is a question to be decided <lb/>upon by the proper Judges. &#x2014; The advantages attending<lb/> the less frequent period of payment, supposing<lb/> it practicable, are <del>so</del> obvious enough: 1 the<lb/> trouble and thence the expence of payment not above<lb/> half as good as in the other case: 2. In the other<lb/> case, the plan for exhibiting the daily value for the<lb/> purpose of a prompt and commodious currency <lb/>would <add><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi></add><lb/> <note> <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> instead of being simple to a degree that will presently be perceived,</note><lb/> be <add>a <gap/> deal</add> complicated &#x2014; <del>more</del> much more so<lb/> than might at first glance be supposed. If therefore <lb/>the public would accept of the yearly mode<lb/> instead of the half yearly mode which the usage <lb/>in regard to the Stocks has rendered the <unclear>correct</unclear> customary <lb/>ones, it would be a considerable advantage. <lb/>Reasons for expecting this acquiescence are not <lb/> wanting. 1. The minuteness of the sum would <lb/>operate as an inducement: and the <gap/> in<lb/> the instance of Exchequer Bills affords a precedent<lb/> in point or very nearly so. From the <del>year</del> <add>day</add> of <lb/>opening to the day of payment is frequently a<lb/> <del>tweil</del> twelvemonth or very little short of it. </p>
   
   


Line 14: Line 14:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

6

the lowness of the proposed rate of interest proposed to be
hoard another
imposed with the now current rate at present
current, (concerning which see ) the exercise of such a power is an event
that presents itself as neither probable nor desirable.

F

[11][AT the above office [May be received Yearly] Whether
the dividends shall be receivable Yearly only, as here
proposed, or half yearly, is a question to be decided
upon by the proper Judges. — The advantages attending
the less frequent period of payment, supposing
it practicable, are so obvious enough: 1 the
trouble and thence the expence of payment not above
half as good as in the other case: 2. In the other
case, the plan for exhibiting the daily value for the
purpose of a prompt and commodious currency
would [+]
[+] instead of being simple to a degree that will presently be perceived,
be a deal complicated — more much more so
than might at first glance be supposed. If therefore
the public would accept of the yearly mode
instead of the half yearly mode which the usage
in regard to the Stocks has rendered the correct customary
ones, it would be a considerable advantage.
Reasons for expecting this acquiescence are not
wanting. 1. The minuteness of the sum would
operate as an inducement: and the in
the instance of Exchequer Bills affords a precedent
in point or very nearly so. From the year day of
opening to the day of payment is frequently a
tweil twelvemonth or very little short of it.



Metadata:JB/002/141/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in