★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/002/287/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/002/287/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Sept. 1800</head><lb/> | <head>Sept. 1800</head><lb/> | ||
<head>Annuity Notes</head> <note>4 Abstract<lb/> | <head>Annuity Notes</head> <note>4 Abstract<lb/> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
} Party effects<lb/> | } Party effects<lb/> | ||
} on this ground</note><lb/> | } on this ground</note><lb/> | ||
<del>it is not in the power, <add>even of combination <hi rend="underline"> | <del>it is not in the power, <add>even of combination <hi rend="underline">conspiracy</hi> <add>strong</add> <del>of machi</del>nation, <del>a combination</del><lb/> | ||
to defeat it</p> | <add>so much as to impede it</add><del>to defeat it</del></p> | ||
<p><del>Limitation only, not prevention</del><lb/> | <p><del>Limitation only, not prevention</del><lb/> | ||
<del>limitation to a degree altogether effect</del> - <lb/> | <del>limitation to a degree altogether without effect</del> - <lb/> | ||
<del>would be the utmost possible result of the most</del> <note><!-- Ink note overwriting a pencil note --><del><gap/> by every</del><lb/> | <del>would be the utmost possible result of the most</del> <note><!-- Ink note overwriting a pencil note --><del><gap/> by every</del><lb/> | ||
<add>[+]</add> <del>impressed on<lb/> | <add>[+]</add> <del>impressed on<lb/> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
an additional security<lb/> | an additional security<lb/> | ||
is in this view<lb/> | is in this view<lb/> | ||
intended as a defence</del>-</note> | intended as a defence</del>-</note><lb/> | ||
<del>< | <note><!-- pencil note -->no opposition on<lb/> | ||
the part of the<lb/> | |||
Ministers to the <lb/> | |||
existing Government<lb/> | |||
could defeat<lb/> | |||
it</note><lb/> | |||
<del><unclear>unanimous</unclear> and most persevering combination that</del><lb/> | |||
<del>could be found against<add>upon</add> the measure in this ground.</del><lb/> | <del>could be found against<add>upon</add> the measure in this ground.</del><lb/> | ||
<del>and</del>,<add>(a)</add> By refusing the paper, each conspirator would make<lb/> | <del>and</del>,<add>(a)</add> By refusing the paper, each conspirator would make<lb/> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 38: | ||
prevention — limitation, to a degree altogether<lb/> | prevention — limitation, to a degree altogether<lb/> | ||
without effect — would be the utmost possible result<lb/> | without effect — would be the utmost possible result<lb/> | ||
of the most unanimous and most per<add>-severing</add><del>sever<gap/></del> opposition on this ground. | of the most unanimous and most per<add>-severing</add><del>sever<gap/></del> <lb/> | ||
opposition on this ground. | |||
</p> | </p> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 47: | ||
<p><del>Though</del> The being <add>so perfectly</add> opposition - proof is a feature<lb/> | <p><del>Though</del> The being <add>so perfectly</add> opposition - proof is a feature<lb/> | ||
by which <del>distinguishes</del> the proposed mode of reduction, <add>stands distinguished</add> in a<lb/> | by which <del>distinguishes</del> the proposed mode of reduction, <add>stands distinguished</add> in a<lb/> | ||
very striking <del>way</del><add><del>degree</del> point of view</add> from every other. Though | very striking <del>way</del><add><del>degree</del> point of view</add> from every other. Though this consequence<lb/> | ||
of the <add>proposed</add> conversion were ever so clearly<lb/> | of the <add>proposed</add> conversion were ever so clearly<lb/> | ||
foreseen, <add>[+]</add> though it were even expressly announced <note><add>[+]</add> by those who<lb/> | foreseen, <add>[+]</add> though it were even expressly announced <note><add>[+]</add> by those who<lb/> | ||
either <del>through</del><add>from</add> | either <del>through</del><add>from</add> faction,<lb/> | ||
motives, or on the<lb/> | motives, or on the<lb/> | ||
honest ground of <lb/> | honest ground of <lb/> | ||
| Line 48: | Line 57: | ||
thwart it</note><lb/> | thwart it</note><lb/> | ||
by government - (as <add>indeed</add> virtually it<add>could not but</add> <del>would</del> be) it<lb/> | by government - (as <add>indeed</add> virtually it<add>could not but</add> <del>would</del> be) it<lb/> | ||
would not be in the power even of conspiracy, so <lb/> | would not be in the power, even of conspiracy, so <lb/> | ||
much as | much as to impede it. By refusing <del>&c</del><add>(a) as above</add> <!-- change to red ink -->as in p.3<lb/> | ||
of the copy.</p><pb/> | of the copy.</p> | ||
<p>2. A sacrifice.</p><pb/> | |||
| Line 62: | Line 73: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Sept. 1800
Annuity Notes 4 Abstract
Ch. XV.
Though this effect of the measure should be foreseen
- [+] though it should even be preexpressly-announced -} It is proof against
} Party effects
} on this ground
it is not in the power, even of combination conspiracy <add>strong of machination, a combination
so much as to impede itto defeat it
Limitation only, not prevention
limitation to a degree altogether without effect -
would be the utmost possible result of the most by every
[+] impressed on
every mind, and most
deeply in those
against whose machinations
it presents
an additional security
is in this view
intended as a defence-
no opposition on
the part of the
Ministers to the
existing Government
could defeat
it
unanimous and most persevering combination that
could be found againstupon the measure in this ground.
and,(a) By refusing the paper, each conspirator would make
a compleat and certain sacrifice of his own personal advantage, without
the smallest chance of affording any possible<add>desirable</add> effectual help
to the common object of the conspiracy. — Limitation only, not
prevention — limitation, to a degree altogether
without effect — would be the utmost possible result
of the most unanimous and most per-severingsever
opposition on this ground.
2. A sacrifice
Note comes in as p. 196
Though The being so perfectly opposition - proof is a feature
by which distinguishes the proposed mode of reduction, stands distinguished in a
very striking waydegree point of view from every other. Though this consequence
of the proposed conversion were ever so clearly
foreseen, [+] though it were even expressly announced [+] by those who
either throughfrom faction,
motives, or on the
honest ground of
personal interest
were disposed to
thwart it
by government - (as indeed virtually itcould not but would be) it
would not be in the power, even of conspiracy, so
much as to impede it. By refusing &c(a) as above as in p.3
of the copy.
2. A sacrifice.
---page break---
