JB/002/351/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/351/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


<note>19<lb/>
<note>19<lb/>
Loss upon <gap/><lb/>
Loss upon Navy<lb/>
Bills as <unclear>composed</unclear><lb/>
Bills as <unclear>compared</unclear><lb/>
In Exchequer Bills<lb/>
to Exchequer Bills<lb/>
a clear loss nobody<lb/>
a clear loss nobody<lb/>
being the better for<lb/>
being the better for<lb/>
Line 16: Line 16:
Navy Bills notwithstanding<lb/>
Navy Bills notwithstanding<lb/>
the <lb/>
the <lb/>
<gap/> facility of<lb/>
superior facility of<lb/>
circulation cost more<lb/>
circulation cost more<lb/>
to Government <gap/><lb/>
to Government <gap/><lb/>
Line 23: Line 23:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:26, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit 41 Cause &c

19
Loss upon Navy
Bills as compared
to Exchequer Bills
a clear loss nobody
being the better for
it

20
Remarkable that
Navy Bills notwithstanding
the
superior facility of
circulation cost more
to Government
even funded annuities

---page break---


Metadata:JB/002/351/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in