JB/002/433/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/433/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/002/433/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/002/433/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p> <note>36</note> <note> Note</note> Art.16. <note>x</note> <note>36</note><lb/> <note> Annuity Notes</note> <lb/> <note> Plan<lb/> 1 Constitution</note> </p> <!-- pencil annotation --> <p> <note> Art <del>15</del>16<lb/>The least <gap/> <lb/> to be issued at<lb/> once <gap/> the<lb/> imposition of that<lb/> sum <gap/> points <lb/> not to be determined<lb/> before hand &#x2014; <lb/> Government would<lb/> of course <unclear>exercise</unclear> <lb/> its decisions by <lb/> public convenience</note></p><p> Arts <del>15</del><add> 16</add>. p.8. [ | [ &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">Least quantity</hi> or <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> ] <lb/> In the advantage derived from governance from that currency<lb/> will be in proportion to the value of it, <lb/> and its extension will be in proportion to the convenience<lb/> afforded by the use of it, Government may <lb/> be safely <sic>nough</sic> trusted with the <sic>adjustance</sic> of these <lb/> two points.  The avoidance of convenience in this <lb/> respect wants no otherwise <gap/> to be allowed than <lb/> by experience.  Whatever course <del><gap/></del> comes to be<lb/> taken <del>in</del> these points at the outset, if it <del>were</del><lb/>fixed by an inflexible rule that rule <del> might</del> <lb/>would be exposed to be rendered an instrument of<lb/> vexation <add> [+] </add><note> [+] The interest by which man would be prompted to render the whole measure abortive, if possible, are as powerful as they are obvious.</note> On the one hand, the inconvenience to <lb/> individuals &#x2014; on the other hand the trouble and <lb/> thence the <sic>expence</sic> to Government might be rendered<lb/> intolerable.</p> <p> <!-- pencil annotation --> <note> If the sum is <lb/> too small, the<lb/> trouble will be <lb/> too great</note> <lb/> <note> If the sum is too<lb/> large <del> <gap/> <lb/> will <gap/> from </del> <add> the door of </add> <lb/> the market will<lb/> be shut against<lb/> so many <unclear>instances</unclear> </note></p> <p> The <del> larger</del> <add> greater</add> the <del>quan</del> number of these notes large<lb/> or small, that came to be taken out at once,<lb/> that is by one and the same person at one and<lb/> the same application, the less the trouble upon each<lb/> note: but the greater the amount in value of <lb/> the least <del><gap/></del> mass of notes allowed to be taken<lb/> out at a time, the fewer are the hands that will <lb/> be able to find <del>money</del> the cash requisite to pay<lb/> for it.  In the case of the standard note of £12:16<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> <del>in</del> the half <del>or</del> <add>the</add> quarter or the eighth of it, there<lb/> is not difficulty: no fear of the trouble's becoming an<lb/> object in notes of such a magnitude: but in the <lb/> case of 1<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> and <del>6</del> sixpenny Notes it is a very different<lb/> affair. Hence too another reason for <del>rendering</del> <add> carrying</add> the extension <lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page -->  downwards by smooth and insensible degrees.</p>  
<head>Art.16.</head> <p> <note>36</note> <note> Note</note><note>x</note> <note>36</note><lb/> <note> Annuity Notes</note> <lb/> <note> Plan<lb/> 1 Constitution</note> </p> <!-- pencil annotation --> <p> <note> Art <del>15</del>16<lb/>The least number <lb/> to be issued at<lb/> once <gap/> the<lb/> imposition of that<lb/> sum <gap/> points <lb/> not to be determined<lb/> before hand &#x2014; <lb/> Government would<lb/> of course <unclear>exercise</unclear> <lb/> its decisions by <lb/> public convenience</note></p><p> Arts <del>15</del><add> 16</add>. p.8. [ | [ &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">Least quantity</hi> or <hi rend="underline"><gap/> &amp;c</hi> ] <lb/> In the advantage derived from governance from that currency<lb/> will be in proportion to the value of it, <lb/> and its extension will be in proportion to the convenience<lb/> afforded by the use of it, Government may <lb/> be safely <sic>nough</sic> trusted with the <sic>adjustance</sic> of these <lb/> two points.  The avoidance of convenience in this <lb/> respect wants no otherwise <gap/> to be obtained than <lb/> by experience.  Whatever course <del><gap/></del> comes to be<lb/> taken <del>in</del> these points at the outset, if it <del>were</del><lb/>fixed by an inflexible rule that rule <del> might</del> <lb/>would be exposed to be rendered an instrument of<lb/> vexation <add> [+] </add><note> [+] The interest by which man would be prompted to render the whole measure abortive, if possible, are as powerful as they are obvious.</note> On the one hand, the inconvenience to <lb/> individuals &#x2014; on the other hand the trouble and <lb/> thence the <sic>expence</sic> to Government might be rendered<lb/> intolerable.</p> <p> <!-- pencil annotation --> <note> If the sum is <lb/> too small, the<lb/> trouble will be <lb/> too great</note> <lb/> <note> If the sum is too<lb/> large <del> <gap/> <lb/> will <gap/> from </del> <add> the door of </add> <lb/> the market will<lb/> be shut against<lb/> so many <unclear>instances</unclear> </note></p> <p> The <del> larger</del> <add> greater</add> the <del>quan</del> number of these notes large<lb/> or small, that came to be taken out at once,<lb/> that is by one and the same person at one and<lb/> the same application, the less the trouble upon each<lb/> note: but the greater the amount in value of <lb/> the least <del><gap/></del> mass of notes allowed to be taken<lb/> out at a time, the fewer are the hands that will <lb/> be able to find <del>money</del> the cash requisite to pay<lb/> for it.  In the case of the standard note of £12:16<hi rend="superscript">s</hi><lb/> <del>in</del> the half <del>or</del> <add>the</add> quarter or the eighth of it, there<lb/> is not difficulty: no fear of the trouble's becoming an<lb/> object in notes of such a magnitude: but in the <lb/> case of 1<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> and <del>6</del> sixpenny Notes it is a very different<lb/> affair. Hence too another reason for <del>rendering</del> <add> carrying</add> the extension <lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page -->  downwards by smooth and insensible degrees.</p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:27, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Art.16.

36 Notex 36
Annuity Notes
Plan
1 Constitution

Art 1516
The least number
to be issued at
once the
imposition of that
sum points
not to be determined
before hand —
Government would
of course exercise
its decisions by
public convenience

Arts 15 16. p.8. [ | [ — Least quantity or &c ]
In the advantage derived from governance from that currency
will be in proportion to the value of it,
and its extension will be in proportion to the convenience
afforded by the use of it, Government may
be safely nough trusted with the adjustance of these
two points. The avoidance of convenience in this
respect wants no otherwise to be obtained than
by experience. Whatever course comes to be
taken in these points at the outset, if it were
fixed by an inflexible rule that rule might
would be exposed to be rendered an instrument of
vexation [+] [+] The interest by which man would be prompted to render the whole measure abortive, if possible, are as powerful as they are obvious. On the one hand, the inconvenience to
individuals — on the other hand the trouble and
thence the expence to Government might be rendered
intolerable.

If the sum is
too small, the
trouble will be
too great

If the sum is too
large
will from
the door of
the market will
be shut against
so many instances

The larger greater the quan number of these notes large
or small, that came to be taken out at once,
that is by one and the same person at one and
the same application, the less the trouble upon each
note: but the greater the amount in value of
the least mass of notes allowed to be taken
out at a time, the fewer are the hands that will
be able to find money the cash requisite to pay
for it. In the case of the standard note of £12:16s
in the half or the quarter or the eighth of it, there
is not difficulty: no fear of the trouble's becoming an
object in notes of such a magnitude: but in the
case of 1s and 6 sixpenny Notes it is a very different
affair. Hence too another reason for rendering carrying the extension
downwards by smooth and insensible degrees.


Metadata:JB/002/433/001

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in