JB/002/481/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/481/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
m 1 revision: Test batch upload 7 for Box 002
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
<!-- please note the main body of the folio has been deleted vertically.  Please add delete tags as necessary -->
 
<head>Art. 20</head>
<head>11<!-- left aligned -->  <note>Annuity Notes</note></head><!-- heading and note in pencil -->
 
<head>Note ?</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<p><!-- indented -->3.  Certainty of success.  The plan succeeded in the
<lb/>
event: but from this circumstance alone <del>not</del> no
<lb/>
conclusion inference is to be drawn relative to the <add>chances</add>
<lb/>
<add>degree of</add> probability of <add>in favour</add> a measure, considered before trial.
<lb/>
[Mar 39 <add>38</add> million out <add>and add</add> of the 57 and add were subscribed for <del>all th</del> within the time;]<!-- opening and closing brackets in pencil -->  <del>The scheme
<lb/>
was</del>  <add>So take as</add> On the 6<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of Feb<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> <add>(according to Sir John <gap/><!-- looks like, 'Laslosw'? -->)</add> the scheme <add>is as</add>, was likely
<lb/>
"to have <sic>faildd</sic> <note>II, 112.</note> very far of the Stockholders having"
<lb/>
<add>submitted</add> <del>signified their <unclear>assent</unclear></del> when a tract of Sir John Barnards
<lb/>
gave the turn to the public mind.
<lb/></p>
 
<p>As it was, out of 89 millions and add, 18
<lb/>
and add remained unsubscribed: and to catch these
<lb/>
18 and add a further time of three months:
<lb/>
from 28<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> Feb<hi rend='superscript'>y</hi> to 30<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of May was given <add>allowed</add>, by a
<lb/>
second <add>another</add> Act<add> +</add> <note><add>+</add> By 23.G. 2. c. 22.</note> [passed for that purpose]<!-- opening and closing brackets in pencil --> by which the
<lb/>
amount of the <unclear>limit</unclear> was however reduced, and
<lb/>
the 89 now - consenters punished as it were for their
<lb/>
contumacy.  Stockholders <add>Whether for want of time or inclination</add>  to the amount of about
<lb/>
3 1/4 Millions<!-- three and a quarter --> still stood out, and were paid off, in
<lb/>
consequence.  <add>Although</add>
<lb/></p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:27, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 481 001.jpg

Click Here To Edit


Art. 20 11 Annuity Notes

Note ?

3. Certainty of success. The plan succeeded in the
event: but from this circumstance alone not no
conclusion inference is to be drawn relative to the chances
degree of probability of in favour a measure, considered before trial.
[Mar 39 38 million out and add of the 57 and add were subscribed for all th within the time;] The scheme
was
So take as On the 6th of Feby (according to Sir John ) the scheme is as, was likely
"to have faildd II, 112. very far of the Stockholders having"
submitted signified their assent when a tract of Sir John Barnards
gave the turn to the public mind.

As it was, out of 89 millions and add, 18
and add remained unsubscribed: and to catch these
18 and add a further time of three months:
from 28th Feby to 30th of May was given allowed, by a
second another Act + + By 23.G. 2. c. 22. [passed for that purpose] by which the
amount of the limit was however reduced, and
the 89 now - consenters punished as it were for their
contumacy. Stockholders Whether for want of time or inclination to the amount of about
3 1/4 Millions still stood out, and were paid off, in
consequence. Although




Identifier: | JB/002/481/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

481

Info in main headings field

art. 20

Image

001

Titles

note?

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1798 a<…>

Marginals

Paper Producer

frances wright

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

ID Number

1220

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in