JB/002/497/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/497/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
<p>[13] [<hi rend='underline'>At first .... principal seen .....not lower</hi> &amp;c]</p>
<p>[13] [<hi rend='underline'>At first .... principal seen .....not lower</hi> &amp;c]</p>


<p>[14] <add>To adapt it to the pockets as</add> <hi rend='underline'>Principal sum .... as low &amp;c</hi>] The tendency<lb/> of small paper to produce this <add>most</add> obvious effect, and<lb/> thence the <add>superior</add> utility of small paper in comparison of<lb/> large, has lately been felt &#x2014; felt universally and<lb/> in a very striking degree, <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> in the instance of Bank paper.</note> &#x2014; but even now, <add>obvious as it is,</add> seems to <lb/>be rather <hi rend='underline'>felt</hi> than generally and clearly understood. <lb/>At the time of the late pressure upon the Bank, two<lb/> measures were resorted to for relief: the one, on the <lb/> part of money it <gap/> at large &#x2014; the agreement to persevere in the acceptance of Bank paper: &#x2014; the <lb/>other on the part of the Bank itself &#x2014; the <sic>spece</sic> of <del>small</del> notes of a smaller denomination than had <lb/>ever been in use before: <gap/>: £2 notes, and £1<lb/> notes. The alarm having <add><unclear>now</unclear></add> taken place, <del>N</del> nothing <lb/>less than <del>that so <gap/>,</del> <add>an <gap/>, <del>there were</del></add> distinguished as <lb/>that was by an union of magnanimity and wisdom<lb/> like that in question, in which magnanimity and <lb/>wisdom were alike conspicuous, and would have been sufficient <lb/>to quiet it: but had the <sic>spece</sic> of small notes taken place a little time before &#x2014; that is time <lb/>enough to <unclear>given</unclear> the requisite <add>degree of increase</add> extension to the circulation<lb/> before those <add>last</add> advances were made to Government<lb/> which were the immediate cause of the pressure, that pressure<lb/> (<del>than</del> <add>it</add> seems probable enough) would never have<lb/>       
<p>[14] <add>To adapt it to the pockets as</add> <hi rend='underline'>Principal sum .... as low &amp;c</hi>] The tendency<lb/> of small paper to produce this <add>most</add> obvious effect, and<lb/> thence the <add>superior</add> utility of small paper in comparison of<lb/> large, has lately been felt &#x2014; felt universally and<lb/> in a very striking degree, <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> in the instance of Bank paper.</note> &#x2014; but even now, <add>obvious as it is,</add> seems to <lb/>be rather <hi rend='underline'>felt</hi> than generally and clearly understood. <lb/>At the time of the late pressure upon the Bank, two<lb/> measures were resorted to for relief: the one, on the <lb/> part of money it <gap/> at large &#x2014; the agreement to persevere in the acceptance of Bank paper: &#x2014; the <lb/>other on the part of the Bank itself &#x2014; the <sic>spece</sic> of <del>small</del> notes of a smaller denomination than had <lb/>ever been in use before: viz: £2 notes, and £1<lb/> notes. The alarm having <add>once</add> taken place, <del>N</del> nothing <lb/>less than <del>that so <gap/>,</del> <add>an <unclear>alteration</unclear>, <del>there were</del></add> distinguished as <lb/>that was by an union of magnanimity and wisdom<lb/> like that in question, in which magnanimity and <lb/>wisdom were alike conspicuous, and would have been sufficient <lb/>to quiet it: but had the <sic>spece</sic> of small notes taken place a little time before &#x2014; that is time <lb/>enough to govern the requisite <add>degree of increase</add> extension to the circulation<lb/> before those <add>last</add> advances were made to Government<lb/> which were the immediate cause of the pressure, that pressure<lb/> (<del>than</del> <add>it</add> seems probable enough) would never have<lb/>       
<head>taken</head> </p>
<add>taken</add> </p>




- -
- -
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:27, 4 February 2020

File:JB 002 497 001.jpg

- -

11
[10] [Yearly Interest &c] [11] [Interest .......unreceived]

Art. 8 [9] [Daily Interest &c] See the Talks in question
in the proposed Form of the Note .

[12] [Rate of interest .... inferior &c] See above, [7]

[13] [At first .... principal seen .....not lower &c]

[14] To adapt it to the pockets as Principal sum .... as low &c] The tendency
of small paper to produce this most obvious effect, and
thence the superior utility of small paper in comparison of
large, has lately been felt — felt universally and
in a very striking degree, + + in the instance of Bank paper. — but even now, obvious as it is, seems to
be rather felt than generally and clearly understood.
At the time of the late pressure upon the Bank, two
measures were resorted to for relief: the one, on the
part of money it at large — the agreement to persevere in the acceptance of Bank paper: — the
other on the part of the Bank itself — the spece of small notes of a smaller denomination than had
ever been in use before: viz: £2 notes, and £1
notes. The alarm having once taken place, N nothing
less than that so , an alteration, there were distinguished as
that was by an union of magnanimity and wisdom
like that in question, in which magnanimity and
wisdom were alike conspicuous, and would have been sufficient
to quiet it: but had the spece of small notes taken place a little time before — that is time
enough to govern the requisite degree of increase extension to the circulation
before those last advances were made to Government
which were the immediate cause of the pressure, that pressure
(than it seems probable enough) would never have
taken


- -


Identifier: | JB/002/497/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[9] [12] [13] [14]]]

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

497

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D11

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

TW 1794

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Francis Hall

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

1236

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in