★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Dear Bentham.
If my criticism has no other
merit it will have that of frankness. I don't like
your preface & should be rather inclined
if I were to
decide betn. that & more should vote for omitting it
altoger.. There is too much levity in it especially as both in the style &
of it forms a very striking contrast with the proposed
title. A man who is about to read of the Constitn.
not violated only but conquered of Enormities committed
& of all our most sacred Laws broken would not expect
to be so much amused at the outset as he will find himself
when he has read only a few parags. of the preface. The
In truth it expresses to me that the title is too vague & the
preface much too comic. I don't like your passing
from the attempted conquest of conscience to the attempted
conquest of the constitn. in 1767. which by the by bye
Identifier: | JB/009/026/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 9. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-02-15 |
|||
009 |
panopticon |
||
026 |
|||
001 |
|||
correspondence |
4 |
||
recto |
|||
samuel romilly |
g stafford 1801 |
||
1801 |
|||
letter 1790, vol. 7; also printed in bowring, xi, 144 |
3327 |
||