JB/009/084/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/009/084/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:


<p>“The armed neutrality was chiefly the<lb/>
<p>“The armed neutrality was chiefly the<lb/>
work of the court of Petersburgh, whereby England<lb/>
work of the Court of Petersburgh, whereby England<lb/>
was deprived of the great advantages which her numerous<lb/>
was deprived of the great advantages which her numerous<lb/>
armed vessels would have given her over<lb/>
armed vessels would have given her over<lb/>
Line 24: Line 24:
she could have no other motive for wishing that<lb/>
she could have no other motive for wishing that<lb/>
cheek removed. The greater the disadvantage, the <lb/>
cheek removed. The greater the disadvantage, the <lb/>
greater her superiority. The armed neutrality was there<lb/>
greater her superiority. The armed neutrality was therefore<lb/>
for a measure of self defence, of equality, of peace<lb/>
a measure of self defence, of equality, of peace<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">self defence</hi>, as it’s object was, merely to protect<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">self defence</hi>, as it’s object was, merely to protect<lb/>
all those northern nations against the being cut<lb/>
all those northern nations against the being cut<lb/>
Line 40: Line 40:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:32, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

236

Text. Paragraph 9.

“The armed neutrality was chiefly the
work of the Court of Petersburgh, whereby England
was deprived of the great advantages which her numerous
armed vessels would have given her over
her enemies, by interrupting their supplies of warlike
stores.

Observations on Par: 9.

The accusation contains within itself
a complete demonstration of it’s own injustice. This
greater disadvantage, which Great Britain, it is said,
experienced by the cheek given to her intercepting
the supplies of her enemies, could have no other
cause, but her superiority over those enemies
she could have no other motive for wishing that
cheek removed. The greater the disadvantage, the
greater her superiority. The armed neutrality was therefore
a measure of self defence, of equality, of peace
of self defence, as it’s object was, merely to protect
all those northern nations against the being cut
off from the disposal of almost the only articles of
their produce. Of equality; because it operated either
equally for and against both parties in the war, or
most against the one whose overbearing power
had given it the “advantage”. Of peace, because by
throwing obstacles, in the way of oppressive power,
it tended to make the success of projects of conquest
or encroachment more tedious and uncertain;
and because the peaceful enterprise was
pursued



Identifier: | JB/009/084/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 9.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

009

Main Headings

Folio number

084

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c12

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

bowring, x, 207ff

ID Number

3385

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in