★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>taken away, <foreign><hi rend="underline">sub silentio</hi></foreign>, - by <hi rend="underline">implication</hi>, or<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">without express words</hi>.</p> | |||
<p>I have carefully <unclear>perused</unclear> the Reports of a<lb/> | |||
Committee of the House of Commons in the<lb/> | |||
year <hi rend="underline"><unclear>1811</unclear></hi>, on the Laws relating to the Penitentiary<lb/> | |||
Houses, and cannot find <sic>any thing</sic> that tends<lb/> | |||
to exclude the Visitorial Powers of the Grand<lb/> | |||
Inquest; — but on the Contrary, in Page <hi rend="underline">14</hi>, The<lb/> | |||
Committee state "that it is more particularly<lb/> | |||
"requisite that in a Penitentiary House opportunities<lb/> | |||
"of complaint should be frequent";<lb/> | |||
and at the Bottom of the Page <hi rend="underline">32</hi>, Sir George<lb/> | |||
Onisiphorous Paul, Bar.<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>, in his Evidence, says,<lb/> | |||
"I think it would be a defect, if it did not provide<lb/> | |||
"for a visitation in person, <hi rend="underline">or if it dispensed</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">"with that, which is already provided by</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">"the general Law."</hi> —</p> | |||
<p>Surely, the Words, "<hi rend="underline">no</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Person</hi>," in the <hi rend="underline">27 Sec</hi>:, cannot apply to, or exclude,<lb/> | |||
without some other express words, the <hi rend="underline">Grand</hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Inquest</hi> (the Visitors or Inspectors of Prisons by</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
taken away, sub silentio, - by implication, or
without express words.
I have carefully perused the Reports of a
Committee of the House of Commons in the
year 1811, on the Laws relating to the Penitentiary
Houses, and cannot find any thing that tends
to exclude the Visitorial Powers of the Grand
Inquest; — but on the Contrary, in Page 14, The
Committee state "that it is more particularly
"requisite that in a Penitentiary House opportunities
"of complaint should be frequent";
and at the Bottom of the Page 32, Sir George
Onisiphorous Paul, Bar.t, in his Evidence, says,
"I think it would be a defect, if it did not provide
"for a visitation in person, or if it dispensed
"with that, which is already provided by
"the general Law." —
Surely, the Words, "no
Person," in the 27 Sec:, cannot apply to, or exclude,
without some other express words, the Grand
Inquest (the Visitors or Inspectors of Prisons by
Identifier: | JB/010/008/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1820-01-31 |
|||
010 |
panopticon |
||
008 |
|||
004 |
|||
correspondence |
4 |
||
recto |
|||
benjamin cooke griffinhoofe |
j green 1819 |
||
fc1 |
|||
1819 |
|||
letter 2586, vol. 9 |
3444 |
||