JB/011/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/012/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 June 12 6<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (1) (6</p> <p> <!-- notes in another hand --> <note> 8<lb/> J.B. &amp; HB. agreed as to<lb/> <sic>fundamentaly</sic><lb/> Differences<lb/> 1 H.B. states them in<lb/> <foreign>ubiter</foreign> J.B. at the<lb/> commence<del>d</del>ment</note></p> <p> <add> To come at <gap/> to fundamentals</add> It is no small satisfaction to me to observe that my<lb/> learned friends and I agree on fundamentals. <del>There</del> <Add> Between however</add> I regard<lb/> to these same fundamentals there is <add> <gap/></add> <del>have</del> two differences</p> <p> 1. the states then no <foreign>ubiter,</foreign> to serve a <gap/> purpose,<lb/> in so many <gap/>: neither at the beginning,<lb/> to give <add> on the analysis</add> the least to expectation; nor at the end, in the<lb/> way of inference.   By no thing are pleased at the commoner</p> <p> <note> 2 HB. in so many<lb/> parenthesis JB. in the <lb/> form of distinct propositions</note></p> <p> 2. By here they are stuck in in so many parentheses <lb/> by me, they are <gap/> in the form of distinct proposition<lb/> each of them actually employed in forming the<lb/> groundwork for what <add> every thing that</add> follows </p> <p><note> 3 HB. departs from<lb/> these rules JB. never<lb/> without notice of exception</note></p> <p> 3. By him the rules of which they are <add>respectively</add> the expression<lb/> are to a wide <add> no inconsiderate</add> extent departed <add> in the field of the subject</add> fromperhaps over<lb/> the whole work the exception of the <add> <gap/></add> narrow step by which<lb/> they were suggested on which they <gap/> their book.   By<lb/> me <del>the</del> no rules is in any instance departed from without<lb/> notice given of the exception, all the <gap/> of the announcement<lb/>< of the <unclear>suit</unclear></p>
<head>1829 June 12 6<lb/>
J.B. on Brougham's Speech.</head>
<p> (1) (6</p> <p> <!-- notes in another hand --> <note> 8<lb/> J.B. &amp; HB. agreed as to<lb/> fundamentals&#x2014;<lb/>Differences<lb/> 1 H.B. states them in<lb/> <foreign>ubiter</foreign> J.B. at the<lb/> commence<del>d</del>ment</note>
</p>  
<p><add> To come at once to fundamentals</add> It is no small satisfaction to me to observe that my<lb/> learned friend and I agree on fundamentals. <del>Then in</del> <add>Believers however</add> In regard<lb/> to these same fundamentals there is <add> are</add> <del>have</del> two differences.</p>
<p> 1. He states then in <foreign>ubiter,</foreign> to serve a particular purpose,<lb/> in so many parentheses: neither at the beginning,<lb/> to give <add> in the analysis</add> the least to expectation; nor at the end, in the<lb/> way of inference. By me no thing are placed at the commencement.</p>  
 
<note>2. HB. in so many<lb/> parentheses JB. in the <lb/> form of distinct propositions.</note>
<p> 2. By him they are stuck in <del>the</del> so many parentheses <lb/> by me, they are exhibited in the form of distinct propositions<lb/> each of them actually employed in forming the<lb/> groundwork for what <add>every thing that</add> follows .</p>
<note>3. HB. departs from<lb/> these rules JB. never<lb/> without notice of exception.</note>
<p> 3. By him the rules of which they are <add>respectively</add> the expression<lb/> are to a wide <add>no inconsiderate</add> extent <add>in the field of the subject</add> departed from: perhaps over<lb/> the whole work the exception of the <add>comparatively</add> narrow slip by which<lb/> they were suggested in which they had their birth. By<lb/> me <del>the</del> no rules is in any instance departed from without<lb/> notice given of the exception, at the time of the announcement<lb/> of the rule.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 12 6
J.B. on Brougham's Speech.

(1) (6

8
J.B. & HB. agreed as to
fundamentals—
Differences
1 H.B. states them in
ubiter J.B. at the
commencedment

To come at once to fundamentals It is no small satisfaction to me to observe that my
learned friend and I agree on fundamentals. Then in Believers however In regard
to these same fundamentals there is are have two differences.

1. He states then in ubiter, to serve a particular purpose,
in so many parentheses: neither at the beginning,
to give in the analysis the least to expectation; nor at the end, in the
way of inference. By me no thing are placed at the commencement.

2. HB. in so many
parentheses JB. in the
form of distinct propositions.

2. By him they are stuck in the so many parentheses
by me, they are exhibited in the form of distinct propositions
each of them actually employed in forming the
groundwork for what every thing that follows .

3. HB. departs from
these rules JB. never
without notice of exception.

3. By him the rules of which they are respectively the expression
are to a wide no inconsiderate extent in the field of the subject departed from: perhaps over
the whole work the exception of the comparatively narrow slip by which
they were suggested in which they had their birth. By
me the no rules is in any instance departed from without
notice given of the exception, at the time of the announcement
of the rule.




Identifier: | JB/011/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-06-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

8

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

jb on brougham's speech

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3709

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in