JB/011/019/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/019/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1829 June 17<lb/> Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. &amp; H.B.?</p>
<note>Supplement</lb>
Agitation and Contribution.</note>


<note>15<lb/>Reformation Agenda<lb/> Agitation &amp; Contribution</note>


<p>15.<lb/> For abolition of Forest<lb/> law the <foreign>Charta Foresta</foreign><lb/> sufficient the <hi rend="underline">subruling</hi><lb/> few being interested in<lb/> giving execution &amp; effect<lb/> to it.</note>
<p>In the tyranny of which the <del>Forest</del> Monarchy-enactive<lb/> Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under <add>any</add> stories<lb/> no instruments: for the abolition of it, that same simple sheet<lb/> of paper <add> was</add> sufficient: the <hi rend="underline">sub-ruling</hi> few, who had been the sufferers by<lb/> it being in such a situation that to the interest they added the<lb/> pieces required and sufficient for giving <add>securing</add> execution and effect<lb/> to it.</p>
<note>16<lb/>
Not so as to abolition<lb/> of sale &amp; denial of<lb/> justice by <foreign>Magna Charta</foreign></note>
<p>Widely different was and is the case <add>the deal of taking</add> in regard to the<lb/>
<foreign><hi rend="underline">Magna Charta</hi></foreign>: the declared <del><gap/></del> and so generally but unhappily but subsequently<lb/> so erroneously supposed instrument of adequate security delay, denial<lb/> and sale and denial of justice. For its purposes and instruments<lb/> tyranny in this shape have the tyrants future and instants and instruments<lb/> applied, we <add> <gap/></add> receivable and at all times absolutely <add>compleatly</add> instrument <lb/> to Judges. Of those <del>depended the</del> who instead of <add> <unclear>be for fear</unclear> </add><lb/> being suffering under it had been and continued to be <del>the</del> sharers<lb/> in the benefit <del><gap/></del> such was the situation, <unclear>also</unclear> to the interest they<lb/> added the pain requisite and sufficient for giving <gap/><lb/> recourse and <gap/> to the grievances instant of giving execution<lb/> and effect to the <unclear>preludedly</unclear> <add>professedly</add> <unclear>alluded</unclear> remedy.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 17
Petition on Despatch Court or Review of J. & H.B.?

Supplement</lb> Agitation and Contribution.

15
Reformation Agenda
Agitation & Contribution

15.
For abolition of Forest
law the Charta Foresta
sufficient the subruling
few being interested in
giving execution & effect
to it.</note>

In the tyranny of which the Forest Monarchy-enactive
Forest law was the instrument, the Monarch had, under any stories
no instruments: for the abolition of it, that same simple sheet
of paper was sufficient: the sub-ruling few, who had been the sufferers by
it being in such a situation that to the interest they added the
pieces required and sufficient for giving securing execution and effect
to it.

16
Not so as to abolition
of sale & denial of
justice by Magna Charta

Widely different was and is the case the deal of taking in regard to the
Magna Charta: the declared and so generally but unhappily but subsequently
so erroneously supposed instrument of adequate security delay, denial
and sale and denial of justice. For its purposes and instruments
tyranny in this shape have the tyrants future and instants and instruments
applied, we receivable and at all times absolutely compleatly instrument
to Judges. Of those depended the who instead of be for fear
being suffering under it had been and continued to be the sharers
in the benefit such was the situation, also to the interest they
added the pain requisite and sufficient for giving
recourse and to the grievances instant of giving execution
and effect to the preludedly professedly alluded remedy.



Identifier: | JB/011/019/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-06-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

petition on dispatch court or review of j & hb?

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3716

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in