JB/011/061/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/061/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 Aug. 3</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p><note> <!-- pencil addition --> Beginning</note></p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --> (11 <note> J.B. End of Justice &amp; Judicature<lb/> <!-- number in pencil --> 29<lb/> Whether function<lb/> of justice will answer<lb/> <del>depend</del> to the customer<lb/> depends on two quantities<lb/> 1 Profit derivable from<lb/> the money laid out if<lb/> otherwise employed<lb/> 2 <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of fees to be paid<lb/> for the delay</note></p> <p> Whether this <gap/> will answer to the producers classed<lb/> upon two quantities on the one hand the <add>upon</add> the <del> term</del> rate of profit which<lb/> <add> the</add> proposed customer may make of the money he has <gap/><add> <gap/> <gap/> </add> <lb/> to get into his hands, <del><gap/></del> whether in the way <add> shape</add> of simple<lb/> interest or in the indefinitely riskier form <add> shape</add> of profit if <gap/><lb/> on the other hand on the number of the fees he will have<lb/> to pay for the delay and the amount of each.  But of the <lb/> <del>rate</del> <add> amount</add>of interest for the time in question, the interesting <unclear>little</unclear> volumes<lb/> on that <add> interesting</add> subject will inform him: if the rate of profit<lb/> his own hopes grounded in such experience as is been before <lb/> paid to him to his hand, and sent so <gap/> as it has<lb/> happened to him to make; and if the quality and quantity<lb/> of the <del>fees</del> <add><del>money</del> disbursement</add> he will have to <del> pay</del> make in the sum of fees<lb/> information at the correct as it is worth his while to make<lb/> it, <add>the books of</add> his Solicitor have at all times ready <add> in readiness</add> for his use.</p> <p><note> <!-- number in pencil --> 30<lb/> The profit not<lb/> exposed to the vicissitude<lb/> of <unclear>words</unclear></note></p> <p> <add> From this <unclear>branch of trusts</unclear> </add> On the part of the purchaser of the delay there may be a certain <add> within a certain part</add> <lb/> extent be <add> of the scale there is room for</add> either profit or loss according as calculation has been <lb/> more or less expert and <unclear>falicities</unclear>: but above a certain point<lb/> in the scale, the profit is sure not being exposed to any of<lb/> these vicissitudes to which every <del>other</del> branch of what commonly<lb/> goes by the name of <unclear>trust</unclear> is so unhappily referred.  Then<lb/> stands the number on the part of the purchaser of this sum <add> the article</add><lb/> commonly: and on the part of the sellers it is all profit, profit<lb/> pure.  All down upon the nail: Judge and <sic>C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> know not<lb/> what it is to trust.</p>  
<head>1829 Aug. 3<lb/>
Reformists reviewed</head>
<note> <!-- pencil addition --> Beginning<lb/>
(11 <lb/>
J.B.<lb/>
End of Justice &amp; Judicature.</note>  


<note><!-- number in pencil --> 29<lb/> Whether function<lb/> of justice will answer<lb/> <del>depend</del> to the customer<lb/> depends on two quantities
<lb/> 1. Profit derivable from<lb/> the money laid out if<lb/> otherwise employed.<lb/> 2. N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> of fees to be paid<lb/> for the delay.</note>


<p>Whether these <gap/> will answer to the particulars depends<lb/> upon two quantities on the one hand the <add>upon</add> the <del>time</del> rate of profit which<lb/>
a <add>the</add> proposed customer may make of the money he has contrived <add>an <gap/> </add> <lb/> to get into his hands, <del>either</del> whether in the way <add>shape</add> of simple<lb/> interest or in the indefinitely riskier form <add>shape</add> of profit of trade<lb/> on the other hand on the number of the fees he will have<lb/> to pay for the delay and the amount of each. But of the <lb/> <del>rate</del> <add>amount</add> of interest for the time in question, the unhappy little volume<lb/> on that <add>unhappy</add> subject will inform him: if the rate of profit<lb/> his own hopes grounded in such difference as it has happened<lb/> to him to have laid, and such <gap/> as it has<lb/> happened to him to make; and if the quality and quantity<lb/> of the <del>fees</del> <add><del>money</del> disbursement</add> he will have to <del>pay</del> make in the sum of fees<lb/> information at the correct as it is worth his while to make<lb/> it, <add>the books of</add> his Solicitor have at all times [been] ready <add>in readiness</add> for his use.</p>
<note><!-- number in pencil -->30<lb/> The profit not<lb/> exposed to the vicissitude<lb/> of trade.</note>
<p><add>From this branch of trade</add> On the part of the purchaser of the delay there may be a certain <add>within a certain part</add><lb/>
extent be <add>of the scale there is room for</add> either profit or loss according as calculation has been <lb/> more or less expert and felicitous: but above a certain point<lb/> in the scale, the profit is sure not being exposed to any of<lb/> these vicissitudes to which every <del>other</del> branch of what commonly<lb/> goes by the name of trade is so unhappily referred. Thus<lb/> stands the matter on the part of the purchaser of <add>the article</add> this same <lb/> commodity: and on the part of the sellers it is all profit&#x2014;profit,<lb/> pure. All down upon the nail: Judge and C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> know not<lb/> what it is to trust.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:33, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 3
Reformists reviewed
Beginning
(11
J.B.
End of Justice & Judicature.

29
Whether function
of justice will answer
depend to the customer
depends on two quantities
1. Profit derivable from
the money laid out if
otherwise employed.
2. No of fees to be paid
for the delay.

Whether these will answer to the particulars depends
upon two quantities on the one hand the upon the time rate of profit which
a the proposed customer may make of the money he has contrived an
to get into his hands, either whether in the way shape of simple
interest or in the indefinitely riskier form shape of profit of trade
on the other hand on the number of the fees he will have
to pay for the delay and the amount of each. But of the
rate amount of interest for the time in question, the unhappy little volume
on that unhappy subject will inform him: if the rate of profit
his own hopes grounded in such difference as it has happened
to him to have laid, and such as it has
happened to him to make; and if the quality and quantity
of the fees money disbursement he will have to pay make in the sum of fees
information at the correct as it is worth his while to make
it, the books of his Solicitor have at all times [been] ready in readiness for his use.

30
The profit not
exposed to the vicissitude
of trade.

From this branch of trade On the part of the purchaser of the delay there may be a certain within a certain part
extent be of the scale there is room for either profit or loss according as calculation has been
more or less expert and felicitous: but above a certain point
in the scale, the profit is sure not being exposed to any of
these vicissitudes to which every other branch of what commonly
goes by the name of trade is so unhappily referred. Thus
stands the matter on the part of the purchaser of the article this same
commodity: and on the part of the sellers it is all profit—profit,
pure. All down upon the nail: Judge and Co know not
what it is to trust.



Identifier: | JB/011/061/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

29-30

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

061

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3758

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in