JB/011/068/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/068/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 Aug. 4</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p> <!-- number in pencil --> (17 <note><del>Beginning</del> J.B.<lb/>Remedies<lb/> Judicature accessible</note></p><p><note> 44<lb/> Summary Procedure<lb/> more condusive than<lb/> regular to <gap/><lb/> of decision</note> </p> <p> <add><del> To the summary forms be substitute<lb/> in order the <gap/>: changing/clearing it of that <gap/> small<lb/> quality of <gap/> with which the fee-gathering system had <gap/> it</del></add></p> <p> Taking then both in hand and taking them <add>both</add> to pieces<lb/> as a Watchmaker does a discordant watch, one artist<lb/> does that in and by the appellations so beloved the true <lb/>characters were reversed. <add>In</add> At least as high a proportion as<lb/> it is <gap/> to the collateral as <add> that which is called summary</add> <del>an</del> <gap/> also to the main<lb/> <del>and</del> end and ends of justice.   Not more conducive is it<lb/> to promptitude of decision than to rectitude: not more <lb/> consequences <add> preeminent in<add>superior</add> for cheapness than <add>as</add> for goodness: that it<lb/> <del>had</del> let in <del>m</del> demands in multitude which the fee gathering<lb/> system would have excluded, and then substituted <gap/> <lb/> and then accidents <gap/> <unclear>redolent</unclear> of desire, in cases<lb/> in which under the regular system, through non-commencement<lb/> <hi rend="underline"><sic>nondecision </sic></hi> would have had place.</p> <p><note>45<lb/> Practical conclusion<lb/> Substitute summary<lb/> throughout to regular.</note> </p> <p> What then says Bentham is <add>ought</add> to be done? Neither more <add> exactly this</add><lb/> nor less than this.   <del> I c</del> Abolish throughout the regular system,<lb/> substitute to it throughout the summary system.   And what is<lb/> this same summary system?   What but the domestic system:<lb/> that same system which every Master of a family <del>practices</del> <add> acts upon</add> <lb/> in his own family, though perhaps as <foreign>Monsieur</foreign> <unclear>Joudan </unclear><lb/> kept talking proves &#x2014; without knowing it.   Some little <unclear>dirt</unclear><lb/> <gap/> he found <unclear>aluring</unclear> to it, <gap/> <unclear>entruded</unclear> by its <lb/> vicinity to the fee-gathering system: this he trusted <gap/> did<lb/> and they reduced <add> purified it</add> to the state of the <gap/></p> <p> <note> Powers necessary few<lb/> besides those possessed<lb/> by domestic Judicature</note> </p> <p> Powers a few <del>in addition</del> over sales in addition<lb/> to those which a father of a family has over children and<lb/> servants, these of course, he <gap/> it <gap/> ideal pen to it<lb/> could not but be necessary: what these are the <add> any</add> reader<lb/> thinks it worth his while may see <add> may be seen</add> in the abovementioned Petitions<lb/> to which for steadiness it is necessary their <unclear>referee</unclear> should be <gap/><lb/> made neither for reprinting them nor for abridgement of them can<lb/> space be here spared.   So much for the inaccessibility of Judicature.</p>  
<head>1829 Aug. 4<lb/>
Reformists reviewed</head>
 
<note> <!-- number in pencil --> (17 <lb/>
Beginning<lb/>
J.B.<lb/>
Remedies<lb/>
Judicatories accessible.</note>
 
<note>44<lb/> Summary Procedure<lb/> more conducive than<lb/> regular to rectitude<lb/> of decision.</note>  
<p><del>To the summary forms be substituted<lb/> in idea the demands: clearing <add>cleaning</add> it of that comparatively small<lb/> quantity of <gap/> <add>with</add> which the fee-gathering system had depended on</del>.</p>
<p>Taking them both in hand and taking them <add>both</add> to pieces<lb/> as a Watchmaker does a disordered watch, one artist<lb/> saw that in and by the appellations so bestowed the true <lb/>characters were reversed. <add>In</add> At least as high a proportion as<lb/> it is preferable to the collateral is <add>that which is called summary</add> <del>as</del> preferable also to the main<lb/> <del>and</del> end and ends of justice. Not more conducive is it<lb/> to promptitude of decision than to rectitude: not more <lb/> conspicuous <add>preeminent / superior as</add> for cheapness than <add>as</add> for goodness: that it<lb/> <del>had</del> let in <del>m</del> demands in multitudes which the fee gathering<lb/> system would have excluded, and then substituted decision<lb/> and thus accidents excepted rectitude of decision, in cases<lb/> in which under the regular system, through non-commencement<lb/> <hi rend="underline"><sic>nondecision</sic></hi> would have had place.</p>
<note>45<lb/> Practical conclusion.<lb/> Substitute summary<lb/> throughout to regular.</note>
<p>What then says Bentham is <add>ought</add> to be done? <add>Exactly this</add> Neither more<lb/> nor less than this. <del>I c</del> Abolish throughout the regular system,<lb/> substitute to it throughout the summary system. And what is<lb/> this same summary system? What but the domestic system:<lb/> that same system which every Master of a family <del>practices</del> <add>acts upon</add> <lb/> in his own family, though perhaps as <foreign>Monsieur Jourdan</foreign><lb/> kept talking proves &#x2014; without knowing it. Some little dust<lb/> indeed he found <unclear>aluring</unclear> to it, dust entrenched by its <lb/> vicinity to the fee-gathering system: this he brushed off <del>and</del><lb/> and then reduced <add>purified it</add> to the state of the domestic.</p>  
<note>46.<lb/>
Powers necessary few<lb/> besides those possessed<lb/> by domestic Judicature.</note>  
<p>Powers as few <del>in addition</del> over suitors in addition<lb/> to those which a father of a family has over children and<lb/> servants, than of course, to fit it to the ideas given to it<lb/>
could not but be necessary: what these are the <add>any</add> reader<lb/> thinks it worth his while may see <add>may be seen</add> in the abovementioned Petitions<lb/>
to which for steadiness it is necessary this reference should be thus<lb/> made. Neither for reprinting them nor for abridgement of them can<lb/> space be here spared. So much for the inaccessibility of Judicature.</p>  
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 4
Reformists reviewed

(17
Beginning
J.B.
Remedies
Judicatories accessible.

44
Summary Procedure
more conducive than
regular to rectitude
of decision.

To the summary forms be substituted
in idea the demands: clearing cleaning it of that comparatively small
quantity of with which the fee-gathering system had depended on
.

Taking them both in hand and taking them both to pieces
as a Watchmaker does a disordered watch, one artist
saw that in and by the appellations so bestowed the true
characters were reversed. In At least as high a proportion as
it is preferable to the collateral is that which is called summary as preferable also to the main
and end and ends of justice. Not more conducive is it
to promptitude of decision than to rectitude: not more
conspicuous preeminent / superior as for cheapness than as for goodness: that it
had let in m demands in multitudes which the fee gathering
system would have excluded, and then substituted decision
and thus accidents excepted rectitude of decision, in cases
in which under the regular system, through non-commencement
nondecision would have had place.

45
Practical conclusion.
Substitute summary
throughout to regular.

What then says Bentham is ought to be done? Exactly this Neither more
nor less than this. I c Abolish throughout the regular system,
substitute to it throughout the summary system. And what is
this same summary system? What but the domestic system:
that same system which every Master of a family practices acts upon
in his own family, though perhaps as Monsieur Jourdan
kept talking proves — without knowing it. Some little dust
indeed he found aluring to it, dust entrenched by its
vicinity to the fee-gathering system: this he brushed off and
and then reduced purified it to the state of the domestic.

46.
Powers necessary few
besides those possessed
by domestic Judicature.

Powers as few in addition over suitors in addition
to those which a father of a family has over children and
servants, than of course, to fit it to the ideas given to it
could not but be necessary: what these are the any reader
thinks it worth his while may see may be seen in the abovementioned Petitions
to which for steadiness it is necessary this reference should be thus
made. Neither for reprinting them nor for abridgement of them can
space be here spared. So much for the inaccessibility of Judicature.



Identifier: | JB/011/068/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

44-46

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

068

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3765

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in