JB/011/094/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/011/094/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 Aug. 5</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p> Severn river <!-- numbers in pencil -->(2) (2 </p> <p><note> Anti reformists<lb/> Pseudo-Reformists<lb/> Eldon and Peel</note></p> <p><note> 2<lb/> <gap/> off reform<lb/> a fork with two prongs<lb/> 1 Commissions 2 Bills</note></p> <p><!-- finger pointing symbol --> From page n. 1.</p> <p> The <gap/> off reform a fork with two prongs, as Horace<lb/> would have phrased it <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> as provided by <add>them</add> the appointed<lb/> artists.  Name of the one prong, <hi rend="underline">Commissions</hi>: name of the<lb/> other prong, <hi rend="underline">Bills</hi>.  Purpose and use of the Bill, setting<lb/> up sham-reform in the room of it</p> <p>3<lb/> First employed commission<lb/> Main use keeping out<lb/> reform Collateral use<lb/> patronage.</note></p> <p> First employed was the Commission system: this had<lb/> a double use main use, keeping out reform; collateral use<lb/> bringing in power and money <add> and <gap/></add> in the shape of <gap/><lb/> power, money as money, worth and <gap/> as in an<lb/> word <hi rend="underline">patronage.</hi></p> <p><note> 4<lb/> So the bills but<lb/> patronage in this<lb/> case trifling</note</p> <p>the same double use had moreover the Bills: for<lb/> patronage is an object more to be neglected.  But here too<lb/> and in much larger proportion, the main use was the <sic>obstacling</sic> <lb/> of real reform: occupying <add> encumbering</add> by a mass of rubbish, <add> <gap/> of</add> the place<lb/> the spot <del><gap/></del. on which it should have been erected<lb/> As to the patronage, in conference of their <gap/> <add> <gap/></add> by the <lb/> commissioners, it was (so we shall see) a mere craft</p> <!-- line across the page in pencil with the words 'Back to page no 1' -->
<head>1829 Aug. 5<lb/>
 
Reformists reviewed</head>
<p>Severn River<!-- numbers in pencil -->(2) (2 </p>
<note>Anti reformists<lb/> Pseudo-Reformists<lb/> Eldon and Peel</note>


<note>2<lb/> To stave off reform<lb/> a fork with two prongs<lb/> 1 Commissions. 2 Bills</note>
<p>☞ From page <!-- |^^^| --> or 1.</p>
<p> The staving off reform a fork with two prongs, as Horace<lb/> would have phrased it <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> as provided by <add>them</add> the appointed<lb/> artists. Name of the one prong, <hi rend="underline">Commissions</hi>: name of the<lb/> other prong, <hi rend="underline">Bills</hi>. Purpose and use of the commissions,<lb/> staving <add>keeping</add> off all reform: purpose and use of the Bill, setting<lb/> up sham-reform in the room of it</p>
<note>3<lb/> First employed Commission<lb/> Main use keeping out<lb/> reform Collateral use<lb/> patronage.</note>
<p> First employed was the Commission system: this had<lb/> a double use main use, keeping out reform; collateral use<lb/> bringing in power and money <add> and adulation</add> in the shape of <gap/><lb/> power, money or moneys worth and adulation as in an<lb/> word <hi rend="underline">patronage.</hi></p>
<note> 4<lb/> So the bills but<lb/> patronage in this<lb/> case trifling</note>
<p>The same double use had moreover the Bills: for<lb/> patronage is an object never to be neglected. But here too<lb/> and in much larger proportion, the main use was the <sic>obstacling</sic> <lb/> of real reform: occupying <add>encumbering</add> by a mass of rubbish, <add>portions of</add> the place<lb/> the spot <del>which it</del> on which it should have been erected<lb/> As to the patronage, in comparison of that produced <add> attested</add> by the <lb/> Commissioners, it was (so we shall see) a mere craft <!-- line across the page in pencil with the words 'Back to page no 1' --></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 5
Reformists reviewed

Severn River(2) (2

Anti reformists
Pseudo-Reformists
Eldon and Peel

2
To stave off reform
a fork with two prongs
1 Commissions. 2 Bills

☞ From page or 1.

The staving off reform a fork with two prongs, as Horace
would have phrased it (a) as provided by them the appointed
artists. Name of the one prong, Commissions: name of the
other prong, Bills. Purpose and use of the commissions,
staving keeping off all reform: purpose and use of the Bill, setting
up sham-reform in the room of it

3
First employed Commission
Main use keeping out
reform Collateral use
patronage.

First employed was the Commission system: this had
a double use main use, keeping out reform; collateral use
bringing in power and money and adulation in the shape of
power, money or moneys worth and adulation as in an
word patronage.

4
So the bills but
patronage in this
case trifling

The same double use had moreover the Bills: for
patronage is an object never to be neglected. But here too
and in much larger proportion, the main use was the obstacling
of real reform: occupying encumbering by a mass of rubbish, portions of the place
the spot which it on which it should have been erected
As to the patronage, in comparison of that produced attested by the
Commissioners, it was (so we shall see) a mere craft



Identifier: | JB/011/094/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

2-4

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

094

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

3791

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in