★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1829 Aug. 5</p> <head> Reformists reviewed.</head> <!-- note in pencil --> <p><note> <gap/></note></p> <p> <!-- numbers in pencil --> (7) (3) <note> Anti Reformists<lb/> Pseudo-Reformists<lb/> Eldon and Peel<lb/> II. Bills</note> </p> <p> <note> 15<lb/> Pay the expense of<lb/> printing the result<lb/> of their labours and<lb/> you will have the<lb/> cooperation of the<lb/> persons most fit<lb/> for the work</note></p> <p> <add> <gap/></add> Do this, and the hands the most fit for it are the hands<lb/> from which it will come. Upon terms such as these, <add> by</add> no workmen<lb/> but such who in their opinion at least are fit for it will any<lb/> work be sent in: and sure enough by no men who <add>but are who</add> in his<lb/> own opinion at least <add>is fit</add> is not fit for it will any such labour<lb/> be undertaken. True it is, that in this case, by some that<lb/> are more or less unfit for it, will <gap/> to more or less < | <p>1829 Aug. 5</p> <head> Reformists reviewed.</head> <!-- note in pencil --> <p><note> <gap/></note></p> <p> <!-- numbers in pencil --> (7) (3) <note> Anti Reformists<lb/> Pseudo-Reformists<lb/> Eldon and Peel<lb/> II. Bills</note> </p> <p> <note> 15<lb/> Pay the expense of<lb/> printing the result<lb/> of their labours and<lb/> you will have the<lb/> cooperation of the<lb/> persons most fit<lb/> for the work</note></p> <p> <add> <gap/></add> Do this, and the hands the most fit for it are the hands<lb/> from which it will come. Upon terms such as these, <add> by</add> no workmen<lb/> but such who in their opinion at least are fit for it will any<lb/> work be sent in: and sure enough by no men who <add>but are who</add> in his<lb/> own opinion at least <add>is fit</add> is not fit for it will any such labour<lb/> be undertaken. True it is, that in this case, by some that<lb/> are more or less unfit for it, will <gap/> to more or less <unclear>extent</unclear><lb/> be sent in, but not less true is it, that if in the whole county<lb/> an <unclear>workman</unclear> there is that is fit for it, his work you will<lb/> have</p> <p><note>16<lb/> Would you keep on<lb/> punishing & paying<lb/> men for punishing<lb/> & producing offence<lb/> against obedience<lb/> continue the present<lb/> system</note> </p> <p><!-- bracket in pencil --> [On the other hand] Would you keep on punishing <lb/> and paying men at what price you please for punishing,<lb/> and at the same time producing offence <add> <sic>delinquence</sic></add> instead of obedience,<lb/> or in the case where he indeed <gap/> but that his <gap/><lb/> you take men in such numbers as you have <add> the fancy takes you</add> to provide for,<lb/> and to whose hand you <sic>committ</sic> the <del>task</del> job. What you <add>you are</add> <lb/> <add> determined upon</add> wish is to prevent the task <add>work</add> from being undertaken by any body<lb/> who is <del>unfit</del> <add> fit</add> for it. To instruct them in direct terms would<lb/> awkward: <del>as would be <gap/></del> to see. "If any <unclear>free</unclear> person presumes<lb/> "to publish in print a proposed <gap/>, especially if vile reasons<lb/> "to it, he shall <del>be <gap/></del> <add> forfeit and pay one thousand pounds</add> suffer imprisonment for <del>ye</del> one year<lb/> " and would the fine be paid, this would be <gap/> and <lb/> written appearance of <gap/>. But no such awkward<lb/> mode of proceeding is necessary. Seeing who <del><gap/></del> they are<lb/> who are accepted <add>chosen</add>, and that by that choice all others are<lb/> rejected, no man will <del><gap/></del> write upon paper any thing<lb/> in the shape of a Case be written upon paper any more than<lb/> upon the Camel in the Regent's Park</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 Aug. 5
Reformists reviewed.
(7) (3) Anti Reformists
Pseudo-Reformists
Eldon and Peel
II. Bills
15
Pay the expense of
printing the result
of their labours and
you will have the
cooperation of the
persons most fit
for the work
Do this, and the hands the most fit for it are the hands
from which it will come. Upon terms such as these, by no workmen
but such who in their opinion at least are fit for it will any
work be sent in: and sure enough by no men who but are who in his
own opinion at least is fit is not fit for it will any such labour
be undertaken. True it is, that in this case, by some that
are more or less unfit for it, will to more or less extent
be sent in, but not less true is it, that if in the whole county
an workman there is that is fit for it, his work you will
have
16
Would you keep on
punishing & paying
men for punishing
& producing offence
against obedience
continue the present
system
[On the other hand] Would you keep on punishing
and paying men at what price you please for punishing,
and at the same time producing offence delinquence instead of obedience,
or in the case where he indeed but that his
you take men in such numbers as you have the fancy takes you to provide for,
and to whose hand you committ the task job. What you you are
determined upon wish is to prevent the task work from being undertaken by any body
who is unfit fit for it. To instruct them in direct terms would
awkward: as would be to see. "If any free person presumes
"to publish in print a proposed , especially if vile reasons
"to it, he shall be forfeit and pay one thousand pounds suffer imprisonment for ye one year
" and would the fine be paid, this would be and
written appearance of . But no such awkward
mode of proceeding is necessary. Seeing who they are
who are accepted chosen, and that by that choice all others are
rejected, no man will write upon paper any thing
in the shape of a Case be written upon paper any more than
upon the Camel in the Regent's Park
|
Identifier: | JB/011/099/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-05 |
15-16 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
099 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c7 / c3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3796 |
|||
