★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/011/103/001" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<head> 1829 July 2<lb/> Review of Law Reformists<lb/> <gap/></head> <p> <note> Conclusion<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> Declared Anti Reformists</add><lb/> <del><gap/> Lydon <add> Eldon</add> Redesdale</del><lb/><del> & <gap/> not thorough<lb/>Law Reformists Sole original<lb/> J.B.</del> </note></p> <p><del> We begin with Mr Bentham. We conclude with Lord <add>Redesdale</add></del> <lb/> <del>Redesdale where now he</del> <add> <gap/> Speaker</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> of Ireland off to House of Commons London Chronicle</del><lb/> <del> of Ireland and <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <!-- blank space --> forget his <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <p><note>1. Eldon<lb/> 2. Redesdale<lb/> 3 Lydon</note></p> <p><note>1<lb/> Declared Anti-Reformists<lb/> 1 — Eldon<lb/> 2 Redesdale<lb/> 3 Lydon<lb/> Their votes recommended<lb/> as of a <gap/><lb/> to operate in recommendation<lb/> of reform</note></p> <!-- the next paragraph has been crossed through --> <p> We begin with a person altogether without <add><gap/></add> of disputing<lb/> meaning <gap/> disputing will contest evils no personage <add> <gap/></add><lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> means along departs of their senses just <add> <unclear>falmus</unclear></add><lb/> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> After some great <unclear>recount</unclear> as to the evidence <hi rend="underline">pro</hi> of authority<lb/> and under <hi rend="underline">con</hi> of <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> go on to say</p> <p> We beg here to recommend most <del><gap/></del> <add> sincerely</add> to ask your<lb/> lawyer and law students as so be all law-<gap/> of <gap/> <add> of best <unclear>care</unclear></add> <lb/> age who are not lawyers as her <gap/> to bestow a <unclear>present</unclear><lb/> on each of these truly valuable and instantly <gap/>: valuable and <lb/> <gap/> in the way of<del><gap/></del> contempt, valuable in the chamber<lb/> of circumstantial evidence in regard to anti-reform <add> <gap/> </add> by <sic>shewing</sic><lb/> to what extraordinary <gap/> of utilities the lesser mind is engaged<lb/> of being sunk by the weight of authority and for the purpose of<lb/> an application this may be <gap/> of the <gap/> in <gap/><lb/> <foreign><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> "<gap/> <gap/>, <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> <gap/></foreign></p> <p> <gap/> of <gap/> imposed <add> reduced</add> by the state, in practice of<lb/> <gap/> law as it be the least stage of mental <unclear>decrepitute</unclear></p> | <head> 1829 July 2<lb/> Review of Law Reformists<lb/> <gap/></head> <p> <note> Conclusion<lb/> <del><gap/></del> <add> Declared Anti Reformists</add><lb/> <del><gap/> Lydon <add> Eldon</add> Redesdale</del><lb/><del> & <gap/> not thorough<lb/>Law Reformists Sole original<lb/> J.B.</del> </note></p> <p><del> We begin with Mr Bentham. We conclude with Lord <add>Redesdale</add></del> <lb/> <del>Redesdale where now he</del> <add> <gap/> Speaker</add> <del><gap/> <gap/> of Ireland off to House of Commons London Chronicle</del><lb/> <del> of Ireland and <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <!-- blank space --> forget his <gap/><lb/> <gap/> <gap/></del></p> <p><note>1. Eldon<lb/> 2. Redesdale<lb/> 3 Lydon</note></p> <p><note>1<lb/> Declared Anti-Reformists<lb/> 1 — Eldon<lb/> 2 Redesdale<lb/> 3 Lydon<lb/> Their votes recommended<lb/> as of a <gap/><lb/> to operate in recommendation<lb/> of reform</note></p> <!-- the next paragraph has been crossed through --> <p> We begin with a person altogether without <add><gap/></add> of disputing<lb/> meaning <gap/> disputing will contest evils no personage <add> <gap/></add><lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> means along departs of their senses just <add> <unclear>falmus</unclear></add><lb/> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> After some great <unclear>recount</unclear> as to the evidence <hi rend="underline">pro</hi> of authority<lb/> and under <hi rend="underline">con</hi> of <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> go on to say</p> <p> We beg here to recommend most <del><gap/></del> <add> sincerely</add> to ask your<lb/> lawyer and law students as so be all law-<gap/> of <gap/> <add> of best <unclear>care</unclear></add> <lb/> age who are not lawyers as her <gap/> to bestow a <unclear>present</unclear><lb/> on each of these truly valuable and instantly <gap/>: valuable and <lb/> <gap/> in the way of<del><gap/></del> contempt, valuable in the chamber<lb/> of circumstantial evidence in regard to anti-reform <add> <gap/> </add> by <sic>shewing</sic><lb/> to what extraordinary <gap/> of utilities the lesser mind is engaged<lb/> of being sunk by the weight of authority and for the purpose of<lb/> an application this may be <gap/> of the <gap/> in <gap/><lb/> <foreign><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> "<gap/> <gap/>, <gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> <gap/></foreign></p> <p> <gap/> of <gap/> imposed <add> reduced</add> by the state, in practice of<lb/> <gap/> law as it be the least stage of mental <unclear>decrepitute</unclear></p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 July 2
Review of Law Reformists
Conclusion
Declared Anti Reformists
Lydon Eldon Redesdale
& not thorough
Law Reformists Sole original
J.B.
We begin with Mr Bentham. We conclude with Lord Redesdale
Redesdale where now he Speaker of Ireland off to House of Commons London Chronicle
of Ireland and forget his
1. Eldon
2. Redesdale
3 Lydon
1
Declared Anti-Reformists
1 — Eldon
2 Redesdale
3 Lydon
Their votes recommended
as of a
to operate in recommendation
of reform
We begin with a person altogether without of disputing
meaning disputing will contest evils no personage
in means along departs of their senses just falmus
After some great recount as to the evidence pro of authority
and under con of do go on to say
We beg here to recommend most sincerely to ask your
lawyer and law students as so be all law- of of best care
age who are not lawyers as her to bestow a present
on each of these truly valuable and instantly : valuable and
in the way of contempt, valuable in the chamber
of circumstantial evidence in regard to anti-reform by shewing
to what extraordinary of utilities the lesser mind is engaged
of being sunk by the weight of authority and for the purpose of
an application this may be of the in
" ,
of imposed reduced by the state, in practice of
law as it be the least stage of mental decrepitute
|
Identifier: | JB/011/103/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-07-02 |
1 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
103 |
review of law reformists |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3800 |
|||
