★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1829 June 16<lb/> Review of J.B. and H.B.</head> <p> (2</p> <p><note> <del>Sub reformists classed</del> <add> Anti-Reformists declared</add></note> </p> <p><note>5<lb/> Self preference no<lb/> exception to the rule</note></p> <p> Self preference — vulgarly regarded as an exception to the<lb/>general rule, in fact the rule and the exception are<lb/> reversed.</p> <p><note> 6<lb/> Nothing more favourable<lb/> than <add>the</add> light thrown<lb/> upon Codification by<lb/> its opponents</note></p> <p> Nothing can happen more favourably<lb/> for this design <add>than</add> that it should have the benefit of the<lb/> light thrown upon the subject of Codification by<lb/> the opponents of it. Sincere altogether is this declaration<lb/> howsoever different may be the construction<lb/> by different persons put upon it.</p> <!-- finger pointing symbol --> <p> To and from this makes mutual references to<lb/> Inclination respecting Lord Eldon under the <unclear>heart</unclear> of<lb/> what is said of the Feegathering <unclear>Regulating</unclear> Statute</p> <p><note>7.<lb/> No sincerity as to<lb/> Law Reform in<lb/> supporters of Eldon's <lb/> fee gathering bill</note></p> <p> Impossibility of supposing sincerity as to Law Reform to<lb/> have place in the breasts of any <add><unclear>Parliament</unclear> man</add> person who contributed<lb/> to that Statute or stood silent when it was proposed.</p> <p> Chancery Commission Report?<lb/> Per William Walton Esq<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>The control which the courts have over costs,<lb/> will enable them to make many useful alterations<lb/> of their own authority — p.634.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 June 16
Review of J.B. and H.B.
(2
Sub reformists classed Anti-Reformists declared
5
Self preference no
exception to the rule
Self preference — vulgarly regarded as an exception to the
general rule, in fact the rule and the exception are
reversed.
6
Nothing more favourable
than the light thrown
upon Codification by
its opponents
Nothing can happen more favourably
for this design than that it should have the benefit of the
light thrown upon the subject of Codification by
the opponents of it. Sincere altogether is this declaration
howsoever different may be the construction
by different persons put upon it.
To and from this makes mutual references to
Inclination respecting Lord Eldon under the heart of
what is said of the Feegathering Regulating Statute
7.
No sincerity as to
Law Reform in
supporters of Eldon's
fee gathering bill
Impossibility of supposing sincerity as to Law Reform to
have place in the breasts of any Parliament man person who contributed
to that Statute or stood silent when it was proposed.
Chancery Commission Report?
Per William Walton Esqr
The control which the courts have over costs,
will enable them to make many useful alterations
of their own authority — p.634.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-16 |
6-7 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
104 |
review of j & hb |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 |
||
|
george bentham; jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3801 |
|||
