★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- this page is organised in three columns --> <head> 1829. Aug.<lb/> Reformists reviewed Peel's Statutes</head> <!-- first column --> <p>§1. Expediency reciting<lb/> words whereas it is expedient<lb/> to followed<lb/> by lines 14 of <sic>myatory</sic> <lb/> indications of what<lb/> might be done</p> <p> Authority-stating<lb/> clause in 5 lines.</p> <p> Indication of the | <!-- this page is organised in three columns --> <head> 1829. Aug.<lb/> Reformists reviewed Peel's Statutes</head> <!-- first column --> <p>§1. Expediency- reciting<lb/> words whereas it is expedient<lb/> to followed<lb/> by lines 14 of <sic>myatory</sic> <lb/> indications of what<lb/> might be done</p> <p> Authority-stating<lb/> clause in 5 lines.</p> <p> Indication of the case<lb/> in which the power<lb/> is given in 9 lines.</p> <p> <del>Power</del><lb/> Clause conferring <lb/> power to Justice or <lb/> Justices 2 1/2 lines.</p> <p> Indication of another<lb/> power-giving case in<lb/> 5 lines.</p> <p> Clause giving power<lb/> to two Justices</p> <p> Indication of another<lb/> power-giving case in<lb/> 13 lines.</p> <p> Obligation-imposing<lb/> clause for bailing in<lb/> 2 lines.</p> <p> Nugatory clause absolving<lb/> justices from<lb/> obligation of hearing<lb/> <del>de</del> evidence on defendants'<lb/> behalf.</p> <p>§2. <hi rend="underline">Expediency</hi> professing<lb/> amendment of<lb/> the two examination<lb/> authorising Statutes<lb/> of Philip and Mary<lb/> Botching accordingly<lb/> through 5 successive<lb/> sections leaving them<lb/> unrepealed about justices<lb/>and coroners.</p> <p> In <add>4 to 12 inclusive</add> successive<lb/> Statutes botching work<lb/> about felony and<lb/> <sic>principalship</sic> and<lb/><sic>accessoryship</sic> ÷ Found<lb/> in a state of confusion<lb/> the subject of co-delinquency — <lb/> so it is left.</p> <p> Felony being an <sic>appellative</sic><lb/> essentially<lb/> <sic>unapt</sic> correspondent is<lb/> the <sic>unaptitude</sic> of every</p> <!-- start of second column --><p> thing here and elsewhere<lb/> predicated of<lb/> it.</p> <p> §.12. Whether <add>of</add> a Felony<lb/> <sic>cognizance</sic> shall be<lb/> taken in one county <lb/> or either of two determined<lb/> by a <add>foot</add> ruler distance<lb/> 500 yards.</p> <p>§.13. Long winded provision<lb/> for punishment <lb/> of offences committed<lb/> during <sic>itinerancy</sic>:<lb/> instead of generic terms<lb/> where instruments of<lb/> conveyance enumeration<lb/> of specific.</p> <p>§.14. Difficulties about<lb/> mod<del>el</del><add>ifications</add> of ownership<lb/> things <del>stolen</del> <add>feloniously owned </add> professed <add>demonstrably</add><lb/> <add>taken</add> to be deviated as if<lb/> it mattered whose<lb/> the things were so they<lb/> were not the thief's.</p> <p>§.15. Another needless <lb/> provision about ownership</p> <p> §.16. Another.</p> <p> §.17. Another.</p> <p> §.18. Another.</p> <p>§.19. In indictments and<lb/> <sic>informations</sic> sham pleas<lb/> obviated — amendments <lb/> of needlessly <sic>alledged</sic><lb/> circumstances <sic>authorized.</sic></p> <p> By §.20 <add> impunity conferring</add> "<hi rend="underline">technical niceties</hi> <lb/> undertaken not<lb/> to be abolished only<lb/> rendered less frequent.</p> <p>§.21. Nullification for want<lb/> of <sic>averment</sic> of irrelevant<lb/> circumstances<lb/> in <hi rend="underline">some</hi> cases nullified.</p> <p> §.22. Provision for reimbursing<lb/> expenses<lb/> of prosecution in felonies — <lb/> Good in principle</p> <!-- start of third column --> <p> §.23. So in misdemeanours</p> <p> §.24. Fees for what<lb/> is done under §§.222<lb/> and 23.</p> <p>§.25. Provision extending <lb/> the charge to<lb/> liberties, franchises,<lb/> &c.</p> <p> §.26. Power to Quarter<lb/> Sessions to make<lb/> regulations as to such<lb/> charges and liberties &<lb/> franchises, &c.</p> <p> §.27. <Add> Like</add> Provision for<lb/> costs of Admiralty prosecutions.</p> <p> §.28. Provision for <lb/> giving rewards to<lb/> persons concerned in<lb/> <sic>prehension</sic> for offences.<lb/> <del>Some</del> sum discretionary,<lb/> not as heretofore<lb/> fixed. Good in<lb/> principle.</p> <p>§.29. Fees for the<lb/> above & mode of recourse<lb/> to Treasury.</p> <p> §.30. Like provision<lb/> for compensation to<lb/> representatives of <sic>prehensors</sic><lb/> killed.</p> <p> §.31. Provision for<lb/> amendment of practice<lb/> as to estreating<lb/> of <sic>recognizances.</sic></p> <p>§.32 & last. Repealing<lb/> Statutes, that is to say<lb/> so much of each as<lb/> relates to such a<lb/> matter. Statutes<lb/> thus left between<lb/> life and death 31.</p> <p>No.II.78.Geo.6.cap.18<lb/> Spring Gen Act.</p> <p> §1. "Whereas is is expedient"<lb/> "<del><gap/></del> <add> Inhibition</add> hypothetical</p> <p>§2. Proviso <sic>frustrative</sic> —<lb/> Vermin-destroying <lb/> engine lawful.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829. Aug.
Reformists reviewed Peel's Statutes
§1. Expediency- reciting
words whereas it is expedient
to followed
by lines 14 of myatory
indications of what
might be done
Authority-stating
clause in 5 lines.
Indication of the case
in which the power
is given in 9 lines.
Power
Clause conferring
power to Justice or
Justices 2 1/2 lines.
Indication of another
power-giving case in
5 lines.
Clause giving power
to two Justices
Indication of another
power-giving case in
13 lines.
Obligation-imposing
clause for bailing in
2 lines.
Nugatory clause absolving
justices from
obligation of hearing
de evidence on defendants'
behalf.
§2. Expediency professing
amendment of
the two examination
authorising Statutes
of Philip and Mary
Botching accordingly
through 5 successive
sections leaving them
unrepealed about justices
and coroners.
In 4 to 12 inclusive successive
Statutes botching work
about felony and
principalship and
accessoryship ÷ Found
in a state of confusion
the subject of co-delinquency —
so it is left.
Felony being an appellative
essentially
unapt correspondent is
the unaptitude of every
thing here and elsewhere
predicated of
it.
§.12. Whether of a Felony
cognizance shall be
taken in one county
or either of two determined
by a foot ruler distance
500 yards.
§.13. Long winded provision
for punishment
of offences committed
during itinerancy:
instead of generic terms
where instruments of
conveyance enumeration
of specific.
§.14. Difficulties about
modelifications of ownership
things stolen feloniously owned professed demonstrably
taken to be deviated as if
it mattered whose
the things were so they
were not the thief's.
§.15. Another needless
provision about ownership
§.16. Another.
§.17. Another.
§.18. Another.
§.19. In indictments and
informations sham pleas
obviated — amendments
of needlessly alledged
circumstances authorized.
By §.20 impunity conferring "technical niceties
undertaken not
to be abolished only
rendered less frequent.
§.21. Nullification for want
of averment of irrelevant
circumstances
in some cases nullified.
§.22. Provision for reimbursing
expenses
of prosecution in felonies —
Good in principle
§.23. So in misdemeanours
§.24. Fees for what
is done under §§.222
and 23.
§.25. Provision extending
the charge to
liberties, franchises,
&c.
§.26. Power to Quarter
Sessions to make
regulations as to such
charges and liberties &
franchises, &c.
§.27. Like Provision for
costs of Admiralty prosecutions.
§.28. Provision for
giving rewards to
persons concerned in
prehension for offences.
Some sum discretionary,
not as heretofore
fixed. Good in
principle.
§.29. Fees for the
above & mode of recourse
to Treasury.
§.30. Like provision
for compensation to
representatives of prehensors
killed.
§.31. Provision for
amendment of practice
as to estreating
of recognizances.
§.32 & last. Repealing
Statutes, that is to say
so much of each as
relates to such a
matter. Statutes
thus left between
life and death 31.
No.II.78.Geo.6.cap.18
Spring Gen Act.
§1. "Whereas is is expedient"
" Inhibition hypothetical
§2. Proviso frustrative —
Vermin-destroying
engine lawful.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/138/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08 |
|||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
138 |
reformists reviewed peel's statutes |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
george bentham |
b&m 1828 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1828 |
|||
|
3835 |
|||
