★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 March 19 <lb/> | <head>1829 March 19 <lb/> Petition Superceded 8 Aug. 1829</head> <!-- indistinct numbers in pencil on top line of heading --> <p><note>Supplement</note></p> <p><note> J.B and Brougham</note></p> <p> (1) <!-- following number in pencil --> (1</p> <p><add> The gerunded and more decorous form of address afforded by this <lb/> the grammatical third person has be found altogether uncomfortable with intelligibility<lb/> It has accordingly been discarded, and the form of the first person is <del>put <gap/> <gap/></del> <!-- continues into the margin --> under the sense of<lb/> necessity put in, and<lb/> worn by what follows.<lb/> <del><gap/></del> Distasteful as<lb/> it is the cup of <gap/><lb/> must be swallowed.</add></p> <p><note> JB's reasons for<lb/> noticing Brougham's <lb/> speech</note></p> <p> The eloquent speech so lately delivered on this<lb/> subject by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Brougham being before the public, it<lb/> seems to me that it can not, in the present occasion<lb/> be left unnoticed without giving rise to conception<lb/>detrimental to the great common causes. How wide <del>such</del><lb/> from <gap/> are the <foreign>hoc</foreign> <del>reminders</del> arrangements proposed<lb/> as reminder for the same use at the same time <add> as a topic that</add> can not<lb/> escape notice which is the nature of the case can not<lb/> escape observation. But the difference <del>may</del> will find<lb/> its cause in the difference between the practice of the two parties<lb/> the difference in practice on one part as compared with the<lb/>other. In whatever I had written on the subject my learned<lb/> friend had the first access: and such parts of it as <sic>permitt</sic><lb/> the greatest quality of <gap/> in the <unclear>seamless</unclear> quality of<lb/><unclear>specie</unclear> <del>one side</del> having been transmitted by me were actually<lb/>in his <gap/> for a considerable length of time: <del>the</del> In<lb/><unclear>letters</unclear> <del>of approbation expressed</del> in which his approbation<lb/> of my words in relation to this subject were conveyed<lb/> and which are Sir black and white, were such, as<lb/> especially from such a quarter might contend the keenest<lb/> <del>more</del> avidly in which the keenest <gap/> would<lb/> not feel any thing wanting for its gratification; nor has<lb/>a syllable of a different complexion <del>ever b</del> since then<lb/> have been received by mne.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 March 19
Petition Superceded 8 Aug. 1829
Supplement
J.B and Brougham
(1) (1
The gerunded and more decorous form of address afforded by this
the grammatical third person has be found altogether uncomfortable with intelligibility
It has accordingly been discarded, and the form of the first person is put under the sense of
necessity put in, and
worn by what follows.
Distasteful as
it is the cup of
must be swallowed.
JB's reasons for
noticing Brougham's
speech
The eloquent speech so lately delivered on this
subject by Mr Brougham being before the public, it
seems to me that it can not, in the present occasion
be left unnoticed without giving rise to conception
detrimental to the great common causes. How wide such
from are the hoc reminders arrangements proposed
as reminder for the same use at the same time as a topic that can not
escape notice which is the nature of the case can not
escape observation. But the difference may will find
its cause in the difference between the practice of the two parties
the difference in practice on one part as compared with the
other. In whatever I had written on the subject my learned
friend had the first access: and such parts of it as permitt
the greatest quality of in the seamless quality of
specie one side having been transmitted by me were actually
in his for a considerable length of time: the In
letters of approbation expressed in which his approbation
of my words in relation to this subject were conveyed
and which are Sir black and white, were such, as
especially from such a quarter might contend the keenest
more avidly in which the keenest would
not feel any thing wanting for its gratification; nor has
a syllable of a different complexion ever b since then
have been received by mne.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/153/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-03-19 |
not numbered |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
153 |
petition |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 / d1 / e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"superseded 8 aug 1829" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
3850 |
||
