JB/011/157/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/157/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 March 19<lb/> Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement</note></p> <p>J.B. and Judge <gap/></note></p> <!-- this paragraph has been crossed through --> <p> <del>From</del> <add> From a recent work the production of /A <gap/></add> a learned gentleman lately devoted to the <del>Branch</del><lb/> <gap/> of Judge in the Court of King's Bench <add>Common Pleas</add> (Mr<lb/> Justice <gap/><!-- blank space --> Park) a former <gap/> of the <del><gap/> <add> author</add> of this page<lb/> has elicited the following observation</p> <!-- several lines of blank space --> <p> To the <add>consideration of the learned</add> young gentleman in question on the part<lb/> and of the unlearned general reader on the other part <del>he</del><lb/> whether for this fresh publication the abovementioned <gap/><lb/> or any similar ones will be sufficient censor: <add>for</add> and<lb/> if it be, <del>the labour</del> <add> by the duties</add> attached to his present high situation,<lb/> by this <del>labour has so</del> duties whatsoever might be the draughts<lb?> made on his time he would not be <gap/> from<lb/> applying <del>computation</del> correction or confutation in manner and<lb/> degree equally efficient.  As a general position it may<lb/> be <del>it</del> laid down, that when a work is a subject of serious<lb/> importance is taken for the <del>perf</del> subject matter of criticism, the<lb/> passing over <add> in <sic>compleat</sic> <gap/></add>the most important parts of it, or the making<lb/> no <del>other</del> mention of them in no other way than in the<lb/> way of allusion by vague generalities without any specific <lb/> application is tolerably conclusive evidence <del>of com</del> <lb/> no only of a man's being in the wrong but of his<lb/> being envious of being so, or if <del>to</del> by law taken the<lb/> matter is rendered clauses, he is no <foreign><hi rend="underline">mala fides</hi></foreign><p> <p> Should <add> it ever happen</add> the present publication to <del>be</del> obtain the <sic>honor</sic> of his<lb/> notice, and a copy of it <add>for that purpose</add> will be presented to him, the <del>numbers</del> <add> figures</add><lb/> present in the paragraph in the abridged Petition with <sic>encreases</sic> <del>the</del><lb/> <add> whatever</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> whatever chance the public<lb/> may possess of receiving<lb/>information on this subject<lb/> from these same learned hands</p>  
<head>1829 March 19<lb/> Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement</note></p> <p>J<note>.B. and Judge Park</note></p> <!-- this paragraph has been crossed through --> <p> <del>From</del> <add> From a recent work the production &amp; <gap/> of</add> a learned gentleman lately devoted to the <del>Branch</del><lb/> situation of Judge in the Court of King's Bench <add>Common Pleas</add> (Mr<lb/> Justice <gap/><!-- blank space --> Park) a former <gap/> of the <del><gap/></del> <add> author</add> of these pages<lb/> has elicited the following observation</p> <!-- several lines of blank space --> <p> To the <add>consideration of the learned</add> young gentleman in question on the one part<lb/> and of the unlearned general reader on the other part <del>he</del><lb/>whether for this fresh publication the abovementioned <unclear>structure</unclear><lb/> or any similar ones will be sufficient answer: <add>for</add> and<lb/> if it be, <del>the labour</del> <add> by the duties</add> attached to his present high situation,<lb/> by these <del>labour has so</del> duties whatsoever might be the draughts<lb/> made on his time he would not be incapacitated from<lb/> applying <del>computation</del> correction or confutation in manner and<lb/> degree equally efficient.  As a general position it may<lb/> be <del>it</del> laid down, that when a work is a subject of serious<lb/> importance is taken for the <del>perf</del> subject matter of criticism, the<lb/> passing over <add> in <sic>compleat</sic> <gap/></add> the most important parts of it, or the making<lb/> no <del>other</del> mention of them in no other way than in the<lb/> way of allusion by vague generalities without any specific <lb/> application is tolerably conclusive evidence <del>of com</del> <lb/> not only of a man's being in the wrong but of his<lb/> being envious of being so, or if <del>to</del> by law taken the<lb/> matter is rendered clauses, he is no <foreign><hi rend="underline">mala fides</hi></foreign></p> <p> Should <add> it ever happen</add> the present publication to <del>be</del> obtain the <sic>honor</sic> of his<lb/> notice, and a copy of it <add>for that purpose</add> will be presented to him, the <del>numbers</del> <add> figures</add><lb/> present in the paragraph in the abridged Petition will <sic>encrease</sic> <del>the</del><lb/> <add> whatever</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> whatever chance the public<lb/> may possess of receiving<lb/>information on this subject<lb/> from these same learned hands</p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 19
Petition

Supplement

J.B. and Judge Park

From From a recent work the production & of a learned gentleman lately devoted to the Branch
situation of Judge in the Court of King's Bench Common Pleas (Mr
Justice Park) a former of the author of these pages
has elicited the following observation

To the consideration of the learned young gentleman in question on the one part
and of the unlearned general reader on the other part he
whether for this fresh publication the abovementioned structure
or any similar ones will be sufficient answer: for and
if it be, the labour by the duties attached to his present high situation,
by these labour has so duties whatsoever might be the draughts
made on his time he would not be incapacitated from
applying computation correction or confutation in manner and
degree equally efficient. As a general position it may
be it laid down, that when a work is a subject of serious
importance is taken for the perf subject matter of criticism, the
passing over in compleat the most important parts of it, or the making
no other mention of them in no other way than in the
way of allusion by vague generalities without any specific
application is tolerably conclusive evidence of com
not only of a man's being in the wrong but of his
being envious of being so, or if to by law taken the
matter is rendered clauses, he is no mala fides

Should it ever happen the present publication to be obtain the honor of his
notice, and a copy of it for that purpose will be presented to him, the numbers figures
present in the paragraph in the abridged Petition will encrease the
whatever
whatever chance the public
may possess of receiving
information on this subject
from these same learned hands




Identifier: | JB/011/157/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-03-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

157

Info in main headings field

petition

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

3854

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in