JB/011/202/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/202/002: Difference between revisions

Lauraterry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>necessary subserviences to the <hi rend="underline">primaeval <unclear>designations</unclear>,</hi> never<lb/>
<p>necessary subserviences to the <hi rend="underline">primaeval despotism</hi>, never<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">have</hi> been, nor, <hi rend="superscript">consistently with </hi><del><gap/></del> the nature of man,  ever could have<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">have</hi> been, nor, <del><gap/></del> <add>consistently will</add> the nature of man,  ever could have<lb/>
been, any other than the maximisation of those same evils,<lb/>
been, any other than the maximisation of those same evils,<lb/>
for the sake of the profit, the magnitude of which keeps face<lb/>
for the sake of the profit, the magnitude of which keeps face<lb/>
with <sic>their's.</sic><lb/></p>
with <sic>their's.</sic><lb/></p>
<lb/>
 
Such as M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Humphrey's proposed <hi rend="underline">Property Code</hi><lb/> the existing <hi rend="underline">Property</hi> <hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">-Law</hi> <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Chaos</hi>, such is my <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>proposal</unclear></hi> <hi rend="underline">Procedure</hi> <lb/>
<p>Such as M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Humphrey's proposed <hi rend="underline">Property Code</hi><lb/>  
is to the existing <hi rend="underline">Property</hi> <del>Code</del> <add>- Law</add> <hi rend="underline">Chaos</hi>, such is my <add>proposal</add> <hi rend="underline">Procedure</hi> <lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Code</hi> to the existing <hi rend="underline">Procedure Chaos.</hi> The same antique<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Code</hi> to the existing <hi rend="underline">Procedure Chaos.</hi> The same antique<lb/>
causes, which, in conjunction with the sinister interest of <lb/>
causes, which, in conjunction with the sinister interest of <lb/>
Judges, gave existence to the existing <hi rend="underline">property system,</hi> gave<lb/>
Judges, gave existence to the existing <hi rend="underline">property system,</hi> gave<lb/>
it to the existing <hi rend="underline">Procedure System.</hi><lb/>
it to the existing <hi rend="underline">Procedure System.</hi></p>
<lb/>
 
You see, Sir, and I, if I have common discern<lb/>
<p>You see, Sir, and I, if I have common discernment<lb/>
ment see perhaps still clearer - (for my eyes were first up<lb/>
see perhaps still clearer - (for my eyes were first upon<lb/>
-on the subject long before your's were in existence), how<lb/>
the subject long before your's were in existence), how<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">great</hi> a part you have to act: you see, and <hi rend="underline">feel </hi> - what<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">great</hi> a part you have to act: you see, and <hi rend="underline">feel </hi> - what<lb/>
I, in my Hermitage, can not so much as <hi rend="underline"><unclear>entertain</unclear></hi>- <lb/>
I, in my Hermitage, can not so much as <hi rend="underline">entertain</hi>- <lb/>
how <hi rend="underline">trying</hi> <unclear>an</unclear> one. Your's is the option, whether to conti-<lb/>
how <hi rend="underline">trying</hi> <unclear>an</unclear> one. Your's is the option, whether to continue<lb/>
nue to <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="superscript">be</hi> what, in appearance at any rate, you have be<lb/>
to <del><gap/></del> <add>be</add> what, in appearance at any rate, you have begun<lb/>
-gun to be, a friend to mankind, or a member of the <unclear>interior</unclear><lb/>
to be, a friend to mankind, or a member of the interior<lb/>
<unclear>Holy-alliance</unclear>, of oppressionists and <gap/><lb/>
Holy-alliance, of oppressionists and <unclear>deforedationists</unclear></p>
With the whole rule of action made as univers<lb/>
 
sally intelligible as it might be - which is what I and others<lb/>
<p>With the whole rule of action made as universally<lb/>
with me <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="superscript">have so long been</hi> aiming at - <hi rend="superscript">(it <gap/> but to <gap/>)</hi>what would be the condition of<lb/>
intelligible as it might be - which is what I and others<lb/>
<del>professional <gap/></del> <gap/> <unclear>professional</unclear> <hi rend="underline">order</hi> in the <del><gap/> of</del> <unclear>Law<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>yer</unclear> <gap/> - <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Law <gap/>?</hi><lb/>
with me <del><gap/></del> <add>have so long been</add> aiming at - <add>(it can not but be asked)</add> what would be the condition of<lb/>
Answer: what that of <del>the</del> <hi rend="underline">medical</hi><lb/>
 
<hi rend="underline">practitioners</hi> <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>m to <gap/> <gap/></unclear> </hi> might be rendered by the draining of a marsh.<lb/>
<del><hi rend="underline">professional <gap/></hi></del> <gap/> <add>professional <hi rend="underline">order</hi> in the <gap/> &amp; <unclear>Lawyer</unclear> class - <hi rend="underline">Law practioners</hi>?</add> Answer: what that of <del>the</del> <hi rend="underline">medical</hi><lb/>
<lb/> <unclear>Sat</unclear>
<hi rend="underline">practioners</hi> <add>in a populous city</add> might be rendered by the draining of a marsh.</p>
 
<p><add>Not</add></p>  
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

necessary subserviences to the primaeval despotism, never
have been, nor, consistently will the nature of man, ever could have
been, any other than the maximisation of those same evils,
for the sake of the profit, the magnitude of which keeps face
with their's.

Such as Mr. Humphrey's proposed Property Code
is to the existing Property Code - Law Chaos, such is my proposal Procedure
Code to the existing Procedure Chaos. The same antique
causes, which, in conjunction with the sinister interest of
Judges, gave existence to the existing property system, gave
it to the existing Procedure System.

You see, Sir, and I, if I have common discernment
see perhaps still clearer - (for my eyes were first upon
the subject long before your's were in existence), how
great a part you have to act: you see, and feel - what
I, in my Hermitage, can not so much as entertain-
how trying an one. Your's is the option, whether to continue
to be what, in appearance at any rate, you have begun
to be, a friend to mankind, or a member of the interior
Holy-alliance, of oppressionists and deforedationists

With the whole rule of action made as universally
intelligible as it might be - which is what I and others
with me have so long been aiming at - (it can not but be asked) what would be the condition of
professional professional order in the & Lawyer class - Law practioners? Answer: what that of the medical
practioners in a populous city might be rendered by the draining of a marsh.

Not





Identifier: | JB/011/202/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

202

Info in main headings field

jb to secy peel

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

w weatherley 1825

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr2

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1825

Notes public

ID Number

3899

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in