★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>(Copy.)</head> | |||
<head>Commissioners of Inquiry into the Superior Common<lb/> | |||
Law Courts.</head> | |||
<head>Jeremy Bentham to the Right Hon<hi rend="superscript">e</hi> Robert Peel.</head> | |||
<p>My respect for your time will suffice to explain<lb/> | |||
and justify the condensed form of this address.<lb/> | |||
Topics, these — I. Requests. II. Proof of need: III. Inducements<lb/> | |||
to compliance viz. 1. certainly unagreeable.<lb/> | |||
2. just possibly agreeable.</p> | |||
<p>I. Requests. In the endeavour thereby to render<lb/> | |||
service to my country (British India included)<lb/> | |||
I have need of two things.</p> | |||
<p>1. From the above Commissione<add>rs</add> <del>all</del> <add>either</add> assent<lb/> | |||
<del>of</del> <add>or</add> dissent with reason as to the numbered proposition<lb/> | |||
in pages from to of the instituted<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Petitions</hi>, &c. herewith sent.</p> | |||
<p>2. Answer to all such <hi rend="underline">pertinent</hi> questions,<lb/> | |||
as, upon my responsibility, I shall have<lb/> | |||
propounded to them touching their own propulsion<lb/> | |||
already published and future intended.</p> | |||
<p>3. For both purposes, a communication from<lb/> | |||
yourself to them <del>expressive</del> in whatsoever may<lb/> | |||
be the most proper form expressive of a desire on<lb/> | |||
your part that such answers may be given.</p> | |||
<note>1829<lb/> | |||
April<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>29</del> | |||
22</note><lb/> | |||
<note>J.B. Q.S.P.<lb/> | |||
to<lb/> | |||
Peel<lb/> | |||
Proposal for Amity<lb/> | |||
Answered by him<lb/> | |||
April 29.</note> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
(Copy.)
Commissioners of Inquiry into the Superior Common
Law Courts.
Jeremy Bentham to the Right Hone Robert Peel.
My respect for your time will suffice to explain
and justify the condensed form of this address.
Topics, these — I. Requests. II. Proof of need: III. Inducements
to compliance viz. 1. certainly unagreeable.
2. just possibly agreeable.
I. Requests. In the endeavour thereby to render
service to my country (British India included)
I have need of two things.
1. From the above Commissioners all either assent
of or dissent with reason as to the numbered proposition
in pages from to of the instituted
Petitions, &c. herewith sent.
2. Answer to all such pertinent questions,
as, upon my responsibility, I shall have
propounded to them touching their own propulsion
already published and future intended.
3. For both purposes, a communication from
yourself to them expressive in whatsoever may
be the most proper form expressive of a desire on
your part that such answers may be given.
1829
April
29
22
J.B. Q.S.P.
to
Peel
Proposal for Amity
Answered by him
April 29.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/334/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1828-04-22 |
|||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
334 |
(copy) |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
correspondence |
4 |
||
|
recto |
/ f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
on blue paper |
4031 |
||
