JB/013/045/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/013/045/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Is Begin Transcribed''
<head>1820. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. 6. Copied this day Sent Nov r 4th</head>


<head>1820. Nov. 6. </head>
<p><gap/> Dec <add>1820</add> For J. C. There appears to have been part of the matter first sent through<lb/> Colomb: if so, <add><gap/></add> safe, and need not be copied for resending</p>
<head>Wednesday 1. Nov.</head>


<p>I am so disheartened, my dear Sir, by the Spanish news of the day, that my facilities seem to have left me. They certainly have, in a great measure, for this day: next day, a part of them will return, but not the whole. This is what I have learnt from those reflex observations which I am constantly making on my own mind. The news I allude to is the (?) put upon the law against public discussion: coupled with the rejection of the law for the suppression of Monasteries.</p>
<head>Wednesday 1. Nov<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>.</head>
<p>The 27 of last month was a day of hope and alacrity to me: it bought me from Mr. Bowring an extract of a letter from Mr. Puigblance on the subject of Codification. The alacrity was in no small degree increased by the receipt of your's, the first I have had the pleasure of receiving; but I hope not the last. It was not long, as you may well imagine, before it was produced to my little knot - M. C. and H. Great was the satisfaction, not small the admiration, it lighted up in their minds. I mention these as so many facts, the knowledge of which, being matter of necessity, the communication of them has a claim to precedency over all reflections.</p>
 
<p>In the humour I am in, an invitation from the Cortes, in the most solemn form, would scarcely give me alacrity enough to undertake the work: perhaps when I am recovered from the present shock, the state of things may not seem so perfectly deplorable. What hope, what pleasure, in framing laws for a government which, should it be inconsistent enough to adopt them, (a thing hardly to be expected) would not give the people the benefit of them? The better the arrangement in question seemed to me to be, the legs would be my hope of seeing it carried into effect.</p>
<p>I am so disheartened, my dear Sir, by the Spanish news<lb/>
<p>Supposed a code ready by the time when Cortes should awake. Will it really be suffered to awake? Not unless satisfactory assurance were attained that it would be the same wretched thing - weak-minded or corrupt or both that it has now shown itself. By sanctioning these liberticide laws, it seems to me that the Cortes has been cutting the ground from under itself. The news that would now be most gratifying to me, is that the government has fallen to pieces: that the La Isla army were in full march for Madrid would be gratifying indeed.</p>
of the day, that my facilities seem to have left me. They certainly<lb/>
have, in a great measure, for this day: next day, a part of them<lb/>
will return, but not the whole. This is what I have learnt from<lb/>
those reflex observations which I am constantly making on my<lb/>
own mind. The news I allude to is the <del>passing of</del> <add>rejection put upon</add> the law <add>against public discussion: coupled with the rejection of the law</add> for the<lb/>
suppression of Monasteries.</p>
<p>The 27 of last month was a day of hope and alacrity<lb/>
to me: it bought me from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Bowring an extract of a<lb/>
letter from M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Puigblance on the subject of Codification. The<lb/>
alacrity was in no small degree <sic>encreased</sic> by the receipt of<lb/>
your's, the first I have had the pleasure of receiving; but I hope<lb/>
not the last. It was not long, as you may well imagine, before<lb/>
it was produced to my little knot - M. C. and H. Great was the<lb/>
satisfaction, not small the admiration, it lighted up in their<lb/>
minds. I mention these as so many facts, the knowledge of<lb/>
which, being matter of necessity, the communication of them<lb/>
has a claim to precedency over all <hi rend="underline">reflections</hi>.</p>
<p>In the humour I am in, an invitation from the<lb/>
Cortes, in the most solemn form, would scarcely give me alacrity<lb/>
enough to undertake the work: perhaps when I am recovered<lb/>
from the present shock, the state of things may not seem<lb/>
so perfectly deplorable. What hope, what pleasure, in framing<lb/>
laws for a government which, should it be inconsistent enough<lb/>
to adopt them, (a thing hardly to be expected) would not give<lb/>
the people the benefit of them? The better the arrangement in<lb/>
question seemed to me to be, the legs would be my hope of seeing it<lb/>
carried into effect.</p>
<p>Supposed a code ready by the time when Cortes<lb/>
should awake. Will it really be suffered to awake? Not<lb/>
unless satisfactory assurance were attained that it would be<lb/>
the same wretched thing - weak-minded or corrupt or both that<lb/>
it has <del>no</del> <add>now</add> shown itself. By sanctioning these liberticide laws, it<lb/>
seems to me that the Cortes has been cutting the ground from under<lb/>
itself. The news that would now be most gratifying to me,<lb/>
is that the government has fallen to pieces: that the La Isla<lb/>
army were in full march for Madrid would be gratifying <add>indeed.</add></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820. Novr. 6. Copied this day Sent Nov r 4th

Dec 1820 For J. C. There appears to have been part of the matter first sent through
Colomb: if so, safe, and need not be copied for resending

Wednesday 1. Novr.

I am so disheartened, my dear Sir, by the Spanish news
of the day, that my facilities seem to have left me. They certainly
have, in a great measure, for this day: next day, a part of them
will return, but not the whole. This is what I have learnt from
those reflex observations which I am constantly making on my
own mind. The news I allude to is the passing of rejection put upon the law against public discussion: coupled with the rejection of the law for the
suppression of Monasteries.

The 27 of last month was a day of hope and alacrity
to me: it bought me from Mr. Bowring an extract of a
letter from Mr. Puigblance on the subject of Codification. The
alacrity was in no small degree encreased by the receipt of
your's, the first I have had the pleasure of receiving; but I hope
not the last. It was not long, as you may well imagine, before
it was produced to my little knot - M. C. and H. Great was the
satisfaction, not small the admiration, it lighted up in their
minds. I mention these as so many facts, the knowledge of
which, being matter of necessity, the communication of them
has a claim to precedency over all reflections.

In the humour I am in, an invitation from the
Cortes, in the most solemn form, would scarcely give me alacrity
enough to undertake the work: perhaps when I am recovered
from the present shock, the state of things may not seem
so perfectly deplorable. What hope, what pleasure, in framing
laws for a government which, should it be inconsistent enough
to adopt them, (a thing hardly to be expected) would not give
the people the benefit of them? The better the arrangement in
question seemed to me to be, the legs would be my hope of seeing it
carried into effect.

Supposed a code ready by the time when Cortes
should awake. Will it really be suffered to awake? Not
unless satisfactory assurance were attained that it would be
the same wretched thing - weak-minded or corrupt or both that
it has no now shown itself. By sanctioning these liberticide laws, it
seems to me that the Cortes has been cutting the ground from under
itself. The news that would now be most gratifying to me,
is that the government has fallen to pieces: that the La Isla
army were in full march for Madrid would be gratifying indeed.



Identifier: | JB/013/045/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

1820-11-03-"1820-11-03-" contains an extrinsic dash or other characters that are invalid for a date interpretation.

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

rid yourselves of ultramaria

Folio number

045

Info in main headings field

jb to mora madrid

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::copy of letter 2706, vol. 10; "copied this day from the brouillon sent novr 3d or 4th / 4 decr 1820 per jc this appears to have been part of the matter first sent through colomb: if so sent safe and need not be copied for resending" [bentham's notes]]]

ID Number

4494

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in