JB/014/015/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/015/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Morals 23 May 179</head>
 
<!-- Column 1 -->
<p>Title &#x2014; <hi rend="underline">Art of pleasing</hi> &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Objections &#x2014;<lb/>
1. Betrays pretension<lb/>
2. Gives <add>suggest</add> an idea<lb/>
of habits of falsehood</p>
 
<p>A man who was<lb/>
known to profess the<lb/>
art of pleasing every<lb/>
body would please<lb/>
nobody.</p>
 
<p>Principles of politeness</p>
 
<p>Objections.<lb/>
1. Politeness carries<lb/>
an idea of restraint<lb/>
2. Indicates pretension<lb/>
of superiority<lb/>
3. Seems to include<lb/>
the inferior classes &#x2014;<lb/>
not to be practicable<lb/>
among <add>by individuals belonging to</add> them &#x2014; that<lb/>
is among the bulk<lb/>
of mankind</p><pb/>
 
<!-- Column 2 -->
<p>Art of pleasing<lb/>
including the art<lb/>
of avoiding to displease</p>
 
<p>Importance of the<lb/>
Art</p>
 
<p>Dignity of the Art</p>
 
<p>It is the art of<lb/>
<del>of</del> communicating <add>occasion</add> <add>contributing</add><lb/>
happiness and avoiding<lb/>
to <del>give</del><lb/>
occasion to unhappiness<lb/>
on the part<lb/>
of others</p>
 
<p>Inducements to practice<lb/>
it<lb/>
1&#x2014; on the score of<lb/>
benevolence<lb/>
2&#x2014; on the score of<lb/>
personal interest</p>
 
<p>Its relation to the<lb/>
higher morals</p>
 
<p>Inferior in point<lb/>
of importance to<lb/>
the higher duties<lb/>
in respect of the<lb/>
quantity of happiness<lb/>
that may be<lb/>
at stake at a time<lb/>
at a given time &#x2014;<lb/>
superior in respect<lb/>
of the frequency of<lb/>
the occasions that<lb/>
may call it into<lb/>
exercise.</p>
 
<p>Connection between<lb/>
the art of pleasing<lb/>
and Christian Charity</p><pb/>
 
<!-- Column 3 -->
<p>Art of avoiding<lb/>
to displease</p>
 
<p>Occasion for<lb/>
conversation <add>exercising it</add> &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Opinion &#x2014; conversation<lb/>
in relation<lb/>
to matters<lb/>
of opinion</p>
 
<p>Avoid defending<lb/>
<del>expressing</del> <add>uttering</add> much<lb/>
less <add>more</add> defending opinions<lb/>
displeasing<lb/>
to the company<lb/>
&#x2014; to <add><hi rend="underline">him</hi> or</add> <hi rend="underline">them</hi> with whom<lb/>
you converse</p>
 
<p>Exception<lb/>
&#x2014; where there is a<lb/>
considerable probability<lb/>
of making a<lb/>
convert, at the same<lb/>
time that the conversion<lb/>
promises<lb/>
to be an event beneficial<lb/>
to society</p>
 
<p>Discussion may<lb/>
be freer <foreign>tete a tete</foreign><lb/>
than in the presence<lb/>
of third persons:<lb/>
because in the latter<lb/>
case, pride is more<lb/>
wounded by superiority.</p><pb/>
 
<!-- Column 4 -->
<p>Topics of objection</p>
 
<p>1. Importance of<lb/>
truth &#x2014; interests of<lb/>
truth superior to all<lb/>
other considerations</p>
 
<p>2. &#x2014; Meanness <add><unclear>Servility</unclear></add> of<lb/>
giving up an opinion<lb/>
i:e: surrendering<lb/>
the interests<lb/>
of truth in the case<lb/>
of a superior in<lb/>
point of office,<lb/>
fortune, or rank</p>
 
<p>Answers &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Importance of truth<lb/>
nonsense &#x2014; truth as<lb/>
truth is of no importance<lb/>
at all</p>
 
<p>Proportions may be<lb/>
great importance<lb/>
in as far as sublimity<lb/>
is importance<lb/>
and yet it <del><gap/></del> may be<lb/>
a matter of no importance<lb/>
at all whether<lb/>
a man believes<lb/>
in them or no</p>
 
<p>Origin (<unclear>intellectual</unclear>) of the error<lb/>
&#x2014; confounding <hi rend="underline">truth</hi><lb/>
with <hi rend="underline">veracity</hi></p>
 
<p>Origin (moral) of<lb/>
the error as misconduct &#x2014;</p>
 
<p>Pride &#x2014; intolerance &#x2014;<lb/>
(a modification of<lb/>
the principle of un<gap/>utting)</p><pb/>
 
<!-- Column 5 -->
<p>An opinion<lb/>
opposite to my own<lb/>
is as far as it<lb/>
goes an evidence<lb/>
of my being in the<lb/>
wrong &#x2014; of an inferiority<lb/>
on my part<lb/>
in point of understanding<lb/>
&#x2014; &amp; in point<lb/>
of power of persuasion</p>
 
<p>Accordingly the<lb/>
more abject the<lb/>
character <add>situation</add> of the opponent<lb/>
the less the<lb/>
opposition hurts<lb/>
me.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Morals 23 May 179

Title — Art of pleasing

Objections —
1. Betrays pretension
2. Gives suggest an idea
of habits of falsehood

A man who was
known to profess the
art of pleasing every
body would please
nobody.

Principles of politeness

Objections.
1. Politeness carries
an idea of restraint
2. Indicates pretension
of superiority
3. Seems to include
the inferior classes —
not to be practicable
among by individuals belonging to them — that
is among the bulk
of mankind


---page break---

Art of pleasing
including the art
of avoiding to displease

Importance of the
Art

Dignity of the Art

It is the art of
of communicating occasion contributing
happiness and avoiding
to give
occasion to unhappiness
on the part
of others

Inducements to practice
it
1— on the score of
benevolence
2— on the score of
personal interest

Its relation to the
higher morals

Inferior in point
of importance to
the higher duties
in respect of the
quantity of happiness
that may be
at stake at a time
at a given time —
superior in respect
of the frequency of
the occasions that
may call it into
exercise.

Connection between
the art of pleasing
and Christian Charity


---page break---

Art of avoiding
to displease

Occasion for
conversation exercising it

Opinion — conversation
in relation
to matters
of opinion

Avoid defending
expressing uttering much
less more defending opinions
displeasing
to the company
— to him or them with whom
you converse

Exception
— where there is a
considerable probability
of making a
convert, at the same
time that the conversion
promises
to be an event beneficial
to society

Discussion may
be freer tete a tete
than in the presence
of third persons:
because in the latter
case, pride is more
wounded by superiority.


---page break---

Topics of objection

1. Importance of
truth — interests of
truth superior to all
other considerations

2. — Meanness Servility of
giving up an opinion
i:e: surrendering
the interests
of truth in the case
of a superior in
point of office,
fortune, or rank

Answers —

Importance of truth
nonsense — truth as
truth is of no importance
at all

Proportions may be
great importance
in as far as sublimity
is importance
and yet it may be
a matter of no importance
at all whether
a man believes
in them or no

Origin (intellectual) of the error
— confounding truth
with veracity

Origin (moral) of
the error as misconduct —

Pride — intolerance —
(a modification of
the principle of unutting)


---page break---

An opinion
opposite to my own
is as far as it
goes an evidence
of my being in the
wrong — of an inferiority
on my part
in point of understanding
— & in point
of power of persuasion

Accordingly the
more abject the
character situation of the opponent
the less the
opposition hurts
me.




Identifier: | JB/014/015/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1795-05-23

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

015

Info in main headings field

morals

Image

002

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4778

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in