JB/014/046/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/014/046/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/014/046/001" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite))
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>6 Sept 1814 3 3</p>
<head>Logic or Ethics</head>
<head>Logic or Ethics</head>
<p>6 Sept 1814. 3. 3.</p>
<note><gap/> <gap/></note>
<note><gap/> <gap/></note>
1 <p><note>§3 Ought it not?<gap/></note></p>


<p>§.3. <add><gap/> <gap/></add> Well-being ought it ever to <del><gap/></del> cease to be the object of <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<note>§3 Ought it not?</note>
<del>Object of pursuit to man &#x2014; what the actual &#x2014; what the proper</del><lb/>
 
<p>§.3. <add>His own</add> Well-being ought it ever to <del><gap/></del> cease to be the object of <del>a <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>Object of pursuit to man&#x2014;what the actual&#x2014;what the proper</del><lb/>
any man's pursuit? <hi rend="underline">Ought</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">ought not</hi>, what.</p>
any man's pursuit? <hi rend="underline">Ought</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">ought not</hi>, what.</p>


<p><del>Well-being, composed of the maximum of pleasure <add>comfort</add> minus</del><lb/>
<p><del>Well-being, composed of the maximum of pleasure <add>comfort</add> minus</del><lb/>
<del>the minimum of pain <add><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></add> is the natural object of <hi rend="underline">pursuit</hi></del><lb/>
<del>the minimum of pain <add>uneasiness at both <gap/></add> is the natural object of <hi rend="underline">pursuit</hi></del><lb/>
<del>to every man at all times.</del></p>
<del>to every man at all times.</del></p>


<p><del>1. Can it ever fail <add>cease</add> <gap/> <gap/> be?</del></p>
<p><del>1. Can it ever fail <add>cease</add> not to be?</del></p>


<p><del>2 Ought it ever <add>On any occasion</add> to cease so to be?</del></p>
<p><del>2. Ought it ever <add>On any occasion</add> to cease so to be?</del></p>


<p><del>3. If it can not ever cease so to be <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> then what</del><lb/>
<p><del>3. If it can not ever cease to so to be then what</del><lb/>
<del>1. Can it ever cease</del><lb/>
<del>1. Can it ever cease</del><lb/>
<del>(it may be asked) can <add>ever</add> be the use of this or any other <gap/> <add>literary <gap/></add> <add>discourse</add></del><lb/>
<del>(it may be asked) can <add>ever</add> be the use of this or any other <gap/> <add>literary <gap/></add> <add>discourse</add></del><lb/>
<del><add>the subject</add> of Ethics?</del></p>
<del><add>the subject</add> of Ethics?</del></p>


<p><del>1.</del> <add>In the instance of any man</add> <del>Can it ever fail or cease so to be? [The answer</del><lb/>
<p><del>1.</del> <add>In the instance of any man</add> <del>Can it ever fail or cease so to be? {The answer</del><lb/>
<del>is] clearly and decidedly</del> <del><add>con<gap/>atingly, and exclusively of</add></del> <add>all exception, the answer is</add> <del>in the negative.</del></p>
<del>is} clearly and decidedly</del> <del><add>unhesitatingly, and exclusively of</add></del> <add>all exception, the answer is</add> <del>in the negative.</del></p>


<p>2. <hi rend="underline">Ought</hi> it ever to cease so to be? the answer will<lb/>
<p>2. <hi rend="underline">Ought</hi> it ever to cease so to be? the answer will<lb/>
Line 35: Line 36:
of which he is considered as a member.</p>
of which he is considered as a member.</p>


<p>But in the first place <add>this word <hi rend="underline">ought</hi></add> what on this occasion<lb/>
<p>But in the first place <add>this word <hi rend="underline">ought</hi></add>&#x2014;what on this occasion<lb/>
is meant by it?</p>
is meant by it?</p>
<note>Ought expounded</note>
<note>Ought expounded</note>
Line 45: Line 46:
it is that the conduct of him who on every occasion<lb/>
it is that the conduct of him who on every occasion<lb/>
takes <add>his own happiness</add> <add>well being</add> for the sole object of his pursuit is approved by<lb/>
takes <add>his own happiness</add> <add>well being</add> for the sole object of his pursuit is approved by<lb/>
me: <add>approved by me,</add> in so much that, were it in my power <add>if it depended upon me</add>, [the object<lb/>
me: <add>approved by me,</add> in so much that, were it in my power <add>if it depended upon me</add>, {the object<lb/>
of his pursuit should not be any other] his pursuit should not<lb/>
of his pursuit should not be any other} his pursuit should not<lb/>
on any occasion have any other object</p>
on any occasion have any other object</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Logic or Ethics

6 Sept 1814. 3. 3.

§3 Ought it not?

§.3. His own Well-being ought it ever to cease to be the object of a
Object of pursuit to man—what the actual—what the proper
any man's pursuit? Ought & ought not, what.

Well-being, composed of the maximum of pleasure comfort minus
the minimum of pain uneasiness at both is the natural object of pursuit
to every man at all times.

1. Can it ever fail cease not to be?

2. Ought it ever On any occasion to cease so to be?

3. If it can not ever cease to so to be then what
1. Can it ever cease
(it may be asked) can ever be the use of this or any other literary discourse
the subject of Ethics?

1. In the instance of any man Can it ever fail or cease so to be? {The answer
is} clearly and decidedly unhesitatingly, and exclusively of all exception, the answer is in the negative.

2. Ought it ever to cease so to be? the answer will
be liable to be different, according to the nature and extent of the interest
will as it is the party whose interest i.e. when well being
is the considered as the preferable object of regard is the individual
himself alone, or mankind at large the society the society
of which he is considered as a member.

But in the first place this word ought—what on this occasion
is meant by it?

Ought expounded

Answer. What by myself is meant by it is altogether
clear to me. If to the other preceding question my answer
is his own happiness well being ought on every occasion to be the
chief sole object of pursuit to every man what I mean by
it is that the conduct of him who on every occasion
takes his own happiness well being for the sole object of his pursuit is approved by
me: approved by me, in so much that, were it in my power if it depended upon me, {the object
of his pursuit should not be any other} his pursuit should not
on any occasion have any other object



Identifier: | JB/014/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1814-09-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

logic or ethics

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] mj&l 1811]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

colonel aaron burr

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1811

Notes public

ID Number

4809

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in