JB/014/149/001

Click Here To Edit

19 Sept. 1814 3

Logic or Ethics Deontology
Ch. Deontologists Office

2

§.2. Improper Office Mode

Of this unison Of the combination thus formed of arrogance, indolence and ignorance
{sufficient} exemplification and sufficient evidence will
be found contained in the compass of a single word.
This word is the word ought: to which will be to be
added, according to the nature of the acts to which it
is applied, the opposite singular expression ought not.

"Ought" — the word
in evidence of
arrogance, indolence
and ignorance

You ought to do so act this way — you ought not to do so to act that other way.
To execute in this way the office of moralist requires
nothing but a the repetition of these two formulaics expressions, coupled
with the description of the species of actions which
it is or is pretended to be the will of the writer to be performed or not exercised or not exercised
performed.

These words — if for one this for this one purpose the use of them
may be allowed, — ought to be banished from the vocabulary
of Morals Ethics.

Identifier: | JB/014/149/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.
Date_1	1814-09-19	Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	014	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	149	Info in main headings field	logic or ethics
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d3 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	4912
Box Contents