JB/014/180/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/180/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
<!-- Pointer symbol --> After the exposition of right and the different sorts of rights<lb/>
<!-- Pointer symbol --> After the exposition of right and the different sorts of rights<lb/>
as <del>explained</del> performed in the old papers by means of the<lb/>
as <del>explained</del> performed in the old papers by means of the<lb/>
relation which these objects bear to <unclear>obligations</unclear> and obligations.</p>
relation which these objects bear to <unclear>obligation</unclear> and obligations.</p>


<p><hi rend="underline">Obligations</hi> is a species of fictitious entity that belongs<lb/>
<p><hi rend="underline">Obligations</hi> is a species of fictitious entity that belongs<lb/>
Line 27: Line 27:
<p>Of deontology the business consists chiefly in <del>marking</del><lb/>
<p>Of deontology the business consists chiefly in <del>marking</del><lb/>
the distribution of obligations: in marking in the field of action<lb/>
the distribution of obligations: in marking in the field of action<lb/>
the <unclear>spot</unclear> upon which it is proper that <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi> in some<lb/>
the <unclear>spots</unclear> upon which it is proper that <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi> in some<lb/>
shape or other obligation should consider itself as attaching<lb/>
shape or other obligation should consider itself as attaching<lb/>
and in case of a conflict among <add>between</add> <hi rend="underline">obligations</hi> issuing<lb/>
and in case of a conflict among <add>between</add> <hi rend="underline">obligations</hi> issuing<lb/>
Line 33: Line 33:
obtain and which should yield the preference.</p>
obtain and which should yield the preference.</p>


<p>Of the obligations which attach upon them <unclear>some lines</unclear><lb/>
<p>Of the obligations which attach upon them <unclear>some times</unclear><lb/>
need to be performed</p>
need to be performed</p>


<p>. <del><gap/></del> To be &#x2014; informed of their rights, from deontology<lb/>
<p>. <del><gap/></del> To be &#x2014; informed of their rights, from deontology<lb/>
at least, they have <unclear>respectively</unclear> speaking a little <del><gap/></del><lb/>
at least, they have &#x2014; <unclear>respectively</unclear> speaking &#x2014; little <del><gap/></del><lb/>
need.</p>
need.</p>


Line 55: Line 55:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Deontology 1.
Ch. Def

1

§. Right & Rights

Add Justice & Injustice

Ch.
Of Right and Rights

After the exposition of right and the different sorts of rights
as explained performed in the old papers by means of the
relation which these objects bear to obligation and obligations.

Obligations is a species of fictitious entity that belongs
to the field of law and the field of deontology.
Right belongs almost exclusively to law: with deontology
it has but little to do: in deontology the it is
comparatively but seldom that the need of occasion for making mention
of it presents itself.

Of deontology the business consists chiefly in marking
the distribution of obligations: in marking in the field of action
the spots upon which it is proper that obligation in some
shape or other obligation should consider itself as attaching
and in case of a conflict among between obligations issuing
from different sources, in determining which ought to obtain should
obtain and which should yield the preference.

Of the obligations which attach upon them some times
need to be performed

. To be — informed of their rights, from deontology
at least, they have — respectively speaking — little
need.

Obligations Rights corresponding to need derived from
correspondent obligations of the perfect kind they can are not
not derive derivable from any other source than law.

Of These legal rights shall they and in what manner on the several occasions
in question make exercise? Such are the questions of for
which it belongs to deontology to find the a solution: but to
give the solution is in each instance to point out of the
several conflicting obligations of the imperfect kind which attach upon
the spot in question, which it is that presents the best till to
be
be regarded considered as the
strongest.



Identifier: | JB/014/180/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

180

Info in main headings field

deontology

Image

001

Titles

ch. / of right and rights

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

4943

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in