JB/014/183/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/183/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>5 Sept. 1815</p>
<head>Deontology</head>
<note>1 Theoretical<lb/>
Ch. Definitions <gap/></note>
<p>3</p>
<note>§. <unclear>Name</unclear> of principle</note>
 
<p>If A man of bad principles is <add>not</add> regarded in <gap/>,<lb/>
man of no principle its on the supposition that <unclear>each the law</unclear><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> some good.</p>
 
<p>Accordingly it is <del><gap/></del> scarcely otherwise than when regarded <add>contrasted</add><lb/>
<add>with</add> in contrast with a man of no principle, that<lb/>
<del>a man</del> his being regarded as coming under the denomination<lb/>
of a man of principle is regarded <add>considered</add> as a just ground for<lb/>
regarding him with approbation.</p>
 
<p>A man of no principle is accordingly a man who <add>to whom the appellation of a man of no principle is</add><lb/>
applied is accordingly a man who without due regard<lb/>
to consequences more or less remote, and to himself or<lb/>
others connected with him of a nature more or less<lb/>
pernicious, yields to every <add>is in the habit <del>whatever</del> of <del>yield</del> giving way to whatever</add> solicitation happens to be administered<lb/>
by <unclear>present</unclear> or nearly approaching pleasure<lb/>
or exemption, regardless of the distant future &#x2014; heedless of<lb/>
the <add>future</add> pain or loss of which such pleasure or exemption<lb/>
may become productive.</p>
<note><unclear>G. a</unclear></note>
 
<p>By a man of <add>bad</add> principles is <add>seems to be</add> commonly understood a man<lb/>
who for the <add>general</add> direction of his conduct <del><gap/></del> is supposed to have <add>regarded as having</add><lb/>
laid down to himself a <add>some</add> general rule or set of general rules,<lb/>
by the observance of which by which in so far as observed<lb/>
the welfare <add>well-being</add> of those persons whose welfare lie within his<lb/>
<unclear>field</unclear> of his action is regarded as being in a way to be <unclear>diminished</unclear>.<lb/>
<del>As of <gap/></del> Thus a man who had laid <del>it thus</del> <add>for his own <gap/></add> to<lb/>
down in his own mind for <del>his own observation</del> <add>a rule that he</add> will on<lb/>
every opportunity do mischief in a certain way or in every<lb/>
imaginable way <add>shape</add> do mischief to every man whose opinion<lb/>
differs from his in this or that particular subject, will in<lb/>
so far be acknowledged by every person who does not join<lb/>
with him in the observance of <del><gap/></del> that same rule<lb/>
be acknowledged <unclear>as one</unclear> <del><add><gap/> <gap/></add></del> to whom the appellation of a man<lb/>
of bad principles may <del>with</del> with truth and propriety be<lb/>
applied.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

5 Sept. 1815

Deontology 1 Theoretical
Ch. Definitions

3

§. Name of principle

If A man of bad principles is not regarded in ,
man of no principle its on the supposition that each the law
some good.

Accordingly it is scarcely otherwise than when regarded contrasted
with in contrast with a man of no principle, that
a man his being regarded as coming under the denomination
of a man of principle is regarded considered as a just ground for
regarding him with approbation.

A man of no principle is accordingly a man who to whom the appellation of a man of no principle is
applied is accordingly a man who without due regard
to consequences more or less remote, and to himself or
others connected with him of a nature more or less
pernicious, yields to every is in the habit whatever of yield giving way to whatever solicitation happens to be administered
by present or nearly approaching pleasure
or exemption, regardless of the distant future — heedless of
the future pain or loss of which such pleasure or exemption
may become productive.

G. a

By a man of bad principles is seems to be commonly understood a man
who for the general direction of his conduct is supposed to have regarded as having
laid down to himself a some general rule or set of general rules,
by the observance of which by which in so far as observed
the welfare well-being of those persons whose welfare lie within his
field of his action is regarded as being in a way to be diminished.
As of Thus a man who had laid it thus for his own to
down in his own mind for his own observation a rule that he will on
every opportunity do mischief in a certain way or in every
imaginable way shape do mischief to every man whose opinion
differs from his in this or that particular subject, will in
so far be acknowledged by every person who does not join
with him in the observance of that same rule
be acknowledged as one to whom the appellation of a man
of bad principles may with with truth and propriety be
applied.




Identifier: | JB/014/183/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1815-09-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

183

Info in main headings field

deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

<…> co

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4946

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in