JB/014/213/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/213/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1818 20</p>
<head>Foundations of d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>.</head> <p>20</p>
 
<p>Being thus in so great a degree free from contradiction<lb/>
&amp; opposition more so than it<lb/>
frequently happens to the Legislator to be when<lb/>
armed with all his powers to be he proceeds<lb/>
with the most perfect composure &#x2014;<lb/>
this self constituted legislator of the popular<lb/>
or moral sanction &#x2014; to lay down, or in a<lb/>
word to enact, his laws. Among the words<lb/>
of form employed on this occasion &amp; for<lb/>
this purpose, are the words <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi><lb/>
<del>aut</del> <hi rend="underline">ought</hi> and ought not.<lb/>
Obligation on the one part ought &amp; ought<lb/>
not on the other may on this occasion<lb/>
be considered as quasi-conjugates.<lb/>
Obligation is either positive or negative.<lb/>
When positive, it has for its quasi conjugate<lb/>
ought, when negative ought not.<lb/>
When it is his will &amp; pleasure that you<lb/>
sh<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>. do the act in question he tells you<lb/>
that you ought to do it you are under<lb/>
an obligation to do it, &amp; the obligation you<lb/>
are under is a positive one &#x2014; When it is<lb/>
his will &amp; pleasure you shall not<lb/>
do it, he informs you that you ought<lb/>
not to do it, and then the obligation you<lb/>
are under is a negative one.</p>
 
<p>In this way it is that the fictitious<lb/>
entity <unclear>have</unclear> for its visible sign the word<lb/>
obligation has been formed: <hi rend="underline">obligation</hi>, from<lb/>
the latin word <hi rend="underline">obligo</hi>, to bind: a twin to <gap/><lb/>
use of which so much importance has been attached and<lb/>
about which such a cloud of obscurity had been <unclear>throwing</unclear> that<lb/>
an entire work, composing an 8<hi rend="superscript">vo</hi> Vol has been employ<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> &#x2014; &amp;<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> + in <unclear>view</unclear> in y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi>. endeavour to dispel it. Whoever wishes<lb/>
to see it dispelled, must call in the principle of utility;<lb/>
and <add>from</add> the system presided by that system borrow<lb/>
the word motive. Where among the motives on this occasion<lb/>
in question the man's conduct is exposed there<lb/>
are one or more, the prevalence of which is regarded by y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi>. writer<lb/>
<note>with an eye of approbation<lb/>
he speaks of<lb/>
the man in question as<lb/>
being under an obligation:<lb/>
an obligat<hi rend="superscript">n</hi>. correspondent<lb/>
to the sanction<lb/>
to which y<hi rend="superscript">e.</hi> motive in<lb/>
question belongs: if to<lb/>
the political or legal sanction<lb/>
a d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi>. or d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> obligation.</note></p>
 
<note>5<lb/>
More free from<lb/>
contradiction than<lb/>
the <add>real</add> legislator, the<lb/>
legislator of the popular<lb/>
sanction, uses at leisure<lb/>
&amp; deals out the terms<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">ought</hi> &amp; <hi rend="underline">ought not</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">obligation</hi>, &amp;c</note>
 
<note>6<lb/>
Obligation, positive<lb/>
or negative &#x2014;<lb/>
ought &#x2014; or ought not &#x2014;</note>
 
<note>Proceed to <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> <gap/> the explanation<lb/>
of obligation</note>
 
<note>7<lb/>
When his pleasure,<lb/>
you should do the act<lb/>
he says you <hi rend="underline">ought</hi>:<lb/>
when his will is you<lb/>
should not, he says<lb/>
you <hi rend="underline">ought not</hi>.</note>
 
<note>8<lb/>
Obligation from obligo<lb/>
latin to bind: so <gap/>ved<lb/>
in clouds that an<lb/>
octavo Vol. has been<lb/>
written to <sic>displ</sic> them.<lb/>
The principle of Utility<lb/>
alone will clear it, with<lb/>
the word <hi rend="underline">motive</hi> as deduced<lb/>
therefrom.</note>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1818 20

Foundations of do.

20

Being thus in so great a degree free from contradiction
& opposition more so than it
frequently happens to the Legislator to be when
armed with all his powers to be he proceeds
with the most perfect composure —
this self constituted legislator of the popular
or moral sanction — to lay down, or in a
word to enact, his laws. Among the words
of form employed on this occasion & for
this purpose, are the words obligation
aut ought and ought not.
Obligation on the one part ought & ought
not on the other may on this occasion
be considered as quasi-conjugates.
Obligation is either positive or negative.
When positive, it has for its quasi conjugate
ought, when negative ought not.
When it is his will & pleasure that you
shd. do the act in question he tells you
that you ought to do it you are under
an obligation to do it, & the obligation you
are under is a positive one — When it is
his will & pleasure you shall not
do it, he informs you that you ought
not to do it, and then the obligation you
are under is a negative one.

In this way it is that the fictitious
entity have for its visible sign the word
obligation has been formed: obligation, from
the latin word obligo, to bind: a twin to
use of which so much importance has been attached and
about which such a cloud of obscurity had been throwing that
an entire work, composing an 8vo Vol has been employd — &
do + in view in ye. endeavour to dispel it. Whoever wishes
to see it dispelled, must call in the principle of utility;
and from the system presided by that system borrow
the word motive. Where among the motives on this occasion
in question the man's conduct is exposed there
are one or more, the prevalence of which is regarded by ye. writer
with an eye of approbation
he speaks of
the man in question as
being under an obligation:
an obligatn. correspondent
to the sanction
to which ye. motive in
question belongs: if to
the political or legal sanction
a do. or do obligation.

5
More free from
contradiction than
the real legislator, the
legislator of the popular
sanction, uses at leisure
& deals out the terms
ought & ought not
obligation, &c

6
Obligation, positive
or negative —
ought — or ought not —

Proceed to
the explanation
of obligation

7
When his pleasure,
you should do the act
he says you ought:
when his will is you
should not, he says
you ought not.

8
Obligation from obligo
latin to bind: so ved
in clouds that an
octavo Vol. has been
written to displ them.
The principle of Utility
alone will clear it, with
the word motive as deduced
therefrom.




Identifier: | JB/014/213/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1818

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-8

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

213

Info in main headings field

deont'ly foundations of do

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d20 / e20

Penner

Watermarks

<…> co

Marginals

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4976

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in