JB/014/227/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/227/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1819 Apr. 26.</p>
<head>Deontology</head> <note>1. Theoretical<lb/>
Ch. 1 <unclear>Relation</unclear></note>
<p>1 1</p>
 
<p>Ch. or §. Prudence and Benevolence [or Beneficence] the virtues to<lb/>
which all others are reducible &#x2014; of which all others are but<lb/>
modifications. Prudence and Benevolence, the two all-comprehensive<lb/>
Virtues.</p>
 
<p>If then conduciveness to happiness is the seat of virtue,<lb/>
if all happiness is <add>either</add> the happiness of the agent himself or the<lb/>
happiness of others, if <add>in mans disposition</add> conduciveness to a mans own happiness<lb/>
is prudence, <del>if conduciveness</del> to the happiness of others benevolence<lb/>
and in so far as productive of <unclear>effect</unclear> <add>effective</add> beneficence,<lb/>
all other virtues howsoever denominated are but so many modifications<lb/>
of prudence or benevolence or both together. Here then <del>we have</del><lb/>
a <del>division o</del> is the act of virtue divided, the whole of it into two<lb/>
branches: forming together a test by which every thing else that<lb/>
has ever borne the name of virtue may be tried: <del>and</del> those<lb/>
which have no value <add>are without value</add> condemned and discarded: and of those<lb/>
which have value the value proved and the quantum of it<lb/>
measured.</p>
 
<p><add>Since Aristotles time</add> Four virtues <del>are</del> have been known under the name of<lb/>
cardinal virtues: <foreign>cardo</foreign> being <sic>latin</sic> for a hinge, virtues in which<lb/>
as doors on hinges all other virtues were said to turn. On<lb/>
the two abovementioned ones, to wit prudence and benevolence<lb/>
yes: on the four in question, no. This will in its order be<lb/>
<sic>shewn</sic> at large. Note mean time that in <add>among</add> Aristotles list <add>virtues</add>, no<lb/>
such virtue as benevolence or beneficence is to be found: nothing<lb/>
nearer to it than justice, which is <add>but</add> a portion of benevolence in<lb/>
disguise.</p>
 
<p>In this way and this way alone &#x2014; namely by indication<lb/>
of the relation borne to happiness that is to pleasure and pain<lb/>
can any clear conception be attached to the words virtue<lb/>
and virtues vice and vices. But for <add>Were it not for</add> this <del><gap/></del> principle of<lb/>
order, not one of these names familiar as they are, the meaning<lb/>
of what is not <del>dark</del> confused <add>unsettled</add> and indeterminate.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Apr. 26.

Deontology 1. Theoretical
Ch. 1 Relation

1 1

Ch. or §. Prudence and Benevolence [or Beneficence] the virtues to
which all others are reducible — of which all others are but
modifications. Prudence and Benevolence, the two all-comprehensive
Virtues.

If then conduciveness to happiness is the seat of virtue,
if all happiness is either the happiness of the agent himself or the
happiness of others, if in mans disposition conduciveness to a mans own happiness
is prudence, if conduciveness to the happiness of others benevolence
and in so far as productive of effect effective beneficence,
all other virtues howsoever denominated are but so many modifications
of prudence or benevolence or both together. Here then we have
a division o is the act of virtue divided, the whole of it into two
branches: forming together a test by which every thing else that
has ever borne the name of virtue may be tried: and those
which have no value are without value condemned and discarded: and of those
which have value the value proved and the quantum of it
measured.

Since Aristotles time Four virtues are have been known under the name of
cardinal virtues: cardo being latin for a hinge, virtues in which
as doors on hinges all other virtues were said to turn. On
the two abovementioned ones, to wit prudence and benevolence
yes: on the four in question, no. This will in its order be
shewn at large. Note mean time that in among Aristotles list virtues, no
such virtue as benevolence or beneficence is to be found: nothing
nearer to it than justice, which is but a portion of benevolence in
disguise.

In this way and this way alone — namely by indication
of the relation borne to happiness that is to pleasure and pain
can any clear conception be attached to the words virtue
and virtues vice and vices. But for Were it not for this principle of
order, not one of these names familiar as they are, the meaning
of what is not dark confused unsettled and indeterminate.




Identifier: | JB/014/227/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1819-04-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

227

Info in main headings field

deontology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

4990

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in