JB/014/299/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/299/001: Difference between revisions

RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
</head>
</head>
<p>
<p>
 
Relation of the modifications of the <hi rend="underline">intellectual</hi> faculty<lb/>
<unclear>Relation</unclear> of the modifications of the <hi rend="underline">intellectual</hi> faculty<lb/>
(for example <del>to</del> as enumerated by J. B. in Chrestomathia)<lb/>
(for example to as enumerated by J. B. in <gap/>)<lb/>
to Virtue and Vice and then to Deontology<lb/>
to Virtue and Vice and then to Deontology<lb/>
They belong to Deontology in so far as a beneficent <add>or maleficent</add> direction<lb/>
They belong to deontology in so far as a beneficent <add>or maleficent</add> direction<lb/>
is capable of being given by the will to the exercise<lb/>
is capable of being given by the will to the exercise<lb/>
of them: and in so far as (<del>a beneficent</del> the direction<lb/>
of them: and in so far as (<del>a beneficent</del> the direction<lb/>
given to them being beneficial) it is in the power of<lb/>
given to them being beneficial) it is in the power of<lb/>
the will to add to the degree of their effective force.<lb/></p>
the will to add to the degree of their spoken force.<lb/></p>


<p>The the faculty of <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> belongs to the understanding,<lb/>
<p>Thus the faculty of <hi rend="underline">invention</hi> belongs to the understanding,<lb/>
is an intellectual faculty. But accordingly<lb/>
is an intellectual faculty. But accordingly<lb/>
as it is applied to good or bad <add>beneficent or maleficent</add> purposes it is through<lb/>
as it is applied to good or bad <add>beneficent or maleficent</add> purposes it is though<lb/>
not itself either a virtue or a vice, an <hi rend="underline">instrument</hi>  in<lb/>
not itself either a virtue or a vice, an <hi rend="underline">instrument</hi>  in<lb/>
<del>the <gap/></del> either of virtue or of vice.<lb/></p>
<del>the <gap/></del> either of virtue or of vice.<lb/></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1828 June 27
Deontology Private
J. B; Intellectual faculties

Relation of the modifications of the intellectual faculty
(for example to as enumerated by J. B. in Chrestomathia)
to Virtue and Vice and then to Deontology
They belong to deontology in so far as a beneficent or maleficent direction
is capable of being given by the will to the exercise
of them: and in so far as (a beneficent the direction
given to them being beneficial) it is in the power of
the will to add to the degree of their spoken force.

Thus the faculty of invention belongs to the understanding,
is an intellectual faculty. But accordingly
as it is applied to good or bad beneficent or maleficent purposes it is though
not itself either a virtue or a vice, an instrument in
the either of virtue or of vice.



Identifier: | JB/014/299/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1828-06-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

299

Info in main headings field

deontology private

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

5062

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in