JB/014/335/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/335/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1829 June 7 G1+ Original.</p>
<head>Article on Utilitarianism</head> <p>Copied. <note>23</note></p>
<p>1</p>
 
<note>34<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Ipsedixit</hi> equally<lb/>
commodious with utility<lb/>
as to conjugates &#x2014;<lb/>
dixitists &#x2014; dixitical &#x2014;<lb/>
dixitism.</note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Ipsedixit</hi> shares with <hi rend="underline">utility</hi> the advantage of being<lb/>
a sort of strap on which, for the purpose of accommodating<lb/>
the radical idea to the various forms <add>ramifications</add> which <add>requisite to</add> the business of<lb/>
discovering conjugates may, in any number be grafted.<lb/>
Thus, as <hi rend="underline">utility</hi> yields <add>lends itself to utilise,</add> utilitarian, and utilitarianism <add>utilitarianism</add><lb/>
so does <add>would</add> <hi rend="underline">ipsedixit</hi> to <hi rend="underline">ipsedixitists</hi>, <add>ipsedixitical</add> and <hi rend="underline">ipsedixitism</hi><lb/>
<del>Not so</del> <add>Of</add> the <hi rend="underline">greatest happiness</hi> principle the texture is not<lb/>
thus felicitous: the substructure and <add>with</add> its adjective <add>before it</add> will not<lb/>
thus coalesce into one word capable of its receiving its<lb/>
cluster of grammatical conjugates</p>
 
<note>35.<lb/>
In this respect perhaps<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">felicity</hi> better than happiness<lb/>
&#x2014; with the addition<lb/>
of maximising or<lb/>
maximization.</note>
 
<p><hi rend="underline">Felicity</hi> the Latin-bred word for <hi rend="underline">happiness</hi> <add>the same idea</add> would<lb/>
in this respect serve better than the Teutonic-bred word<lb/>
happiness. <add>Of</add> Logical conjugates it has already <hi rend="underline">felicitous</hi><lb/>
and <unclear>felicitate</unclear>. It might be made to have <unclear>felicitista</unclear>, <del>and</del><lb/>
felicitism and <unclear>felicitousness</unclear>: but the requisite not to say<lb/>
necessary <sic>adjunctitious</sic> idea associated with the word <hi rend="underline">greatest</hi><lb/>
would in this case be still wanting. <del>Possibly</del> <hi rend="underline">Felicity</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">maximizing</hi> or <hi rend="underline">felicity-maximization</hi> principle are<lb/>
denominations <del>whi</del> not incapable of being proposed for consideration<lb/>
as candidates for the <sic>honor</sic> of being employed<lb/>
for this same purpose: for although <del><gap/></del> in both these cases<lb/>
the appellation is composed of two distinct words, yet these<lb/>
coalesce with little if any less facility than the two words<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">ipsedixit</hi> which for a time beyond the memory of man<lb/>
have in this their combined and conjugate forms had place<lb/>
in the language.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:37, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1829 June 7 G1+ Original.

Article on Utilitarianism

Copied. 23

1

34
Ipsedixit equally
commodious with utility
as to conjugates —
dixitists — dixitical —
dixitism.

Ipsedixit shares with utility the advantage of being
a sort of strap on which, for the purpose of accommodating
the radical idea to the various forms ramifications which requisite to the business of
discovering conjugates may, in any number be grafted.
Thus, as utility yields lends itself to utilise, utilitarian, and utilitarianism utilitarianism
so does would ipsedixit to ipsedixitists, ipsedixitical and ipsedixitism
Not so Of the greatest happiness principle the texture is not
thus felicitous: the substructure and with its adjective before it will not
thus coalesce into one word capable of its receiving its
cluster of grammatical conjugates

35.
In this respect perhaps
felicity better than happiness
— with the addition
of maximising or
maximization.

Felicity the Latin-bred word for happiness the same idea would
in this respect serve better than the Teutonic-bred word
happiness. Of Logical conjugates it has already felicitous
and felicitate. It might be made to have felicitista, and
felicitism and felicitousness: but the requisite not to say
necessary adjunctitious idea associated with the word greatest
would in this case be still wanting. Possibly Felicity
maximizing or felicity-maximization principle are
denominations whi not incapable of being proposed for consideration
as candidates for the honor of being employed
for this same purpose: for although in both these cases
the appellation is composed of two distinct words, yet these
coalesce with little if any less facility than the two words
ipsedixit which for a time beyond the memory of man
have in this their combined and conjugate forms had place
in the language.




Identifier: | JB/014/335/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-06-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

34-35

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

335

Info in main headings field

article on utilitarianism

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / f23

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

richard doane

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"original / copied" [note in colls's hand]]]

ID Number

5098

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in